Clinical outcomes after elective double-embryo transfer in frozen cycles for women of advanced maternal age: A retrospective cohort study

We aimed to determine the clinical outcome of double cleavage-stage embryo transfers in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles for older women.This study analyzed a total of 8189 cleavage-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles between January 2013 and December 2017 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. All cycles were sorted into 3 groups based on patient age: ≤35 years (Group A), 36 to 37 years (Group B), and ≥38 years (Group C). The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), live birth rate (LBR), miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), preterm birth rate, and low-birth-weight rate were compared between the 3 groups.Significant differences in CPR, IR, LBR, MPR, and premature birth rate were found among the 3 groups. The CPR, IR, LBR, and MPR in Group A were higher than those in Group C. Transfers of 2 high-quality embryos resulted in significant differences in CPR, IR, LBR, MPR, and neonatal weight among the 3 groups, but no differences in premature birth and abortion rates were observed. Transfers with 1 high-quality and 1 fair-quality embryo resulted in significant differences in CPR, IR, and LBR among the 3 groups. Comparison of transfers of 2 high-quality embryos with 1 high-quality and 1 fair-quality embryo showed that the CPR and LBR were significantly lower for the latter in Groups A and C, but Group B had no salient changes.Higher IR and LBR and lower MPR may be achieved by selection of optimal embryo types for patients of different ages. Two high-quality embryos need to be transferred in women older than 38 years. For women aged 36 to 37 years, 1 high-quality embryo or 1 high-quality plus 1 fair-quality embryo should be singled out for transfer. For women younger than 35 years, a single high-quality embryo should be selected for transfer.

Comparison of Frozen Embryo Transfer Outcomes Between Uterine Infusion of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Growth Hormone Application in Patients With Thin Endometrium: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of two treatments on the outcome of freeze-thaw embryo transfer for pregnancy assistance in thin endometrium.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 66 patients who failed in the first cycle treated in the reproductive medicine center of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used through cavity infusion in one group (n=25, and growth hormone (GH) was subcutaneously injected in the group (n=41). The clinical data of the two groups were compared, including morphology and thickness of the endometrium, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate in each period of the hormone replacement cycle.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, BMI, AMH, FSH, LH, E₂, infertility years, number of transferred embryos, basal endometrium, and thickness of endometrium on the day of P administration before and after treatment (P> 0.05). After treatment, compared to the GH group, the G-CSF group presented higher biochemical pregnancy rate (56% versus 48.8%; P=0.569), clinical pregnancy rate (52% versus 46.3%; P=0.655), implantation rate (34.8% versus 27.5%; P=0.391), and live birth rate (40% versus 31.7%; P=0.493), but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On the 5th day of treatment, the endometrial thickness in the G-CSF group was thinner than that in the GH group (4.83 ± 0.85 versus 5.75 ± 1.27; P< 0.05), but it had no correlation with pregnancy outcome (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness between the two groups on the 7th, 9th day of treatment and the day of P administration (P > 0.05). On the 5th day of treatment, the proportion of endometrial type A morphology in the GH group was significantly higher than that in the G-CSF group (P < 0.05), while the type B morphology in the G-CSF group was significantly higher than that in the GH group (P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although G-CSF and GH may not have a role in increasing endometrium, both of them can improve the pregnancy outcomes of patients with thin endometrium in the FET cycle. And the effects of the two treatments were similar.