1
|
Liu Y, Wang W, Yin R, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Pan H, Wang K, Lou G, Li G, Zhang R, Li K, Rao J, Zhang B, Wang Y, Wang Q, Gao Y, Li H. A phase 1 trial of fuzuloparib in combination with apatinib for advanced ovarian and triple-negative breast cancer: efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and germline BRCA mutation analysis. BMC Med 2023; 21:376. [PMID: 37775744 PMCID: PMC10542255 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03046-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of the combination of an anti-angiogenic agent with a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in cancer treatment is unclear. We assessed the oral combination of fuzuloparib, a PARP inhibitor, and apatinib, a VEGFR2 inhibitor for treating advanced ovarian cancer (OC) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS This dose-escalation and pharmacokinetics-expansion phase 1 trial was conducted in China. We used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, with 7 dose levels tested. Patients received fuzuloparib orally twice daily, and apatinib orally once daily. The study objectives were to determine the safety profile, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, preliminary efficacy, and efficacy in relation to germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAmut). RESULTS Fifty-two pre-treated patients were enrolled (30 OC/22 TNBC). 5 (9.6%) patients had complete response, 14 (26.9%) had partial response, and 15 (28.8%) had stable disease. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 36.5% (95% CI 23.6-51.0) and 65.4% (95% CI 50.9-78.0), respectively. At the highest dose level of fuzuloparib 100 mg plus apatinib 500 mg, the ORR was 50.0% (4/8; 95% CI 15.7-84.3); this dose was determined to be the RP2D. Patients with gBRCAmut had higher ORR and longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than those with gBRCAwt, both in OC (ORR, 62.5% [5/8] vs 40.9% [9/22]; PFS, 9.4 vs 6.7 months) and TNBC (ORR, 66.7% [2/3] vs 15.8% [3/19]; PFS, 5.6 vs 2.8 months). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred: grade 4 febrile neutropenia (fuzuloparib 100 mg plus apatinib 250 mg) and thrombocytopenia (fuzuloparib 100 mg plus apatinib 375 mg). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 toxicities in all patients were hypertension (19.2%), anaemia (13.5%), and decreased platelet count (5.8%). Exposure of apatinib increased proportionally with increasing dose ranging from 250 to 500 mg, when combined with fuzuloparib 100 mg. CONCLUSIONS Fuzuloparib plus apatinib had acceptable safety in patients with advanced OC or TNBC. Fuzuloparib 100 mg bid plus apatinib 500 mg qd was established as the RP2D. With the promising clinical activity observed, this combination is warranted to be further explored as a potential alternative to chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03075462 (Mar. 9, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxin Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gynecologic Cancer Surgery Unit, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China
| | - Rutie Yin
- Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Cancer, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Youzhong Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shangdong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Medical Ethics Committee, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Keqiang Zhang
- Gynecologic Oncology Ward V, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ke Wang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ge Lou
- Gynecology Ward 1, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Guiling Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ruyan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Rao
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Ben Zhang
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuting Wang
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Quanren Wang
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunong Gao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gynecologic Cancer Surgery Unit, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China.
| | - Huiping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Foroughi O, Madraswala S, Hayes J, Glover K, Lee L, Chaki M, Redpath S, Yu AW, Chiu D, Amanti KG, Gustavsen G. Barriers to g BRCA Testing in High-Risk HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1228. [PMID: 37623478 PMCID: PMC10455724 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the OlympiA trial demonstrating that early-stage, high-risk, HER2- germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) positive breast cancer patients can benefit from PARPi in the adjuvant setting, the gBRCA testing rate in early-stage HR+/HER2- patients remains suboptimal compared to that in early-stage TNBC patients. To better understand the perceived barriers associated with gBRCA testing in HR+/HER2- disease, a quantitative survey was conducted across stakeholders (n = 430) including medical oncologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, payers, and patients. This study revealed that while payers claim to cover gBRCA testing, poor clinician documentation and overutilization are key challenges. Therefore, payers place utilization management controls on gBRCA testing due to their impression that clinicians overtest. These controls have led to healthcare professionals experiencing payer pushback in the form of reimbursement limitations and denials. The perceived challenges to gBRCA testing stem from the lack of consensus dictating which patients are high risk and should be tested. While payers define high risk based on the CPS + EG score from the OlympiA trial, HCPs adopt a broader definition including genomic risk scores, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade and size. A dialogue to harmonize risk classification and testing eligibility across stakeholders is critical to address this disconnect and increase gBRCA testing in appropriate patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Liam Lee
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Chiu
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aghajanian C, Swisher EM, Okamoto A, Steffensen KD, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Friedlander M, Moore KN, Tewari KS, O'Malley DM, Chan JK, Ratajczak C, Hashiba H, Wu M, Dinh MH, Coleman RL. Impact of veliparib, paclitaxel dosing regimen, and germline BRCA status on the primary treatment of serous ovarian cancer - an ancillary data analysis of the VELIA trial. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:278-287. [PMID: 34930617 PMCID: PMC9399938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the Phase 3 VELIA trial (NCT02470585), veliparib added to carboplatin plus paclitaxel concomitantly and as maintenance for women with newly-diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy alone. Here we present exploratory analyses by paclitaxel dosing schedule and germline BRCA (gBRCA) status. METHODS Women with untreated ovarian carcinoma were randomized (1:1:1) to: veliparib during chemotherapy and maintenance (veliparib-throughout), veliparib during chemotherapy followed by placebo maintenance (veliparib-combination only), or placebo during chemotherapy and maintenance (control). Chemotherapy included carboplatin plus dose-dense (DD; weekly) or every-3-week (Q3W) paclitaxel (a stratification factor at randomization), selected at the investigator's discretion pre-randomization. PFS was assessed by paclitaxel dosing schedule using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted by treatment arm and stratification factors; safety was analyzed based on paclitaxel dosing schedule and gBRCA status. RESULTS 1132 patients were analyzed by paclitaxel schedule. Pooled treatment arms demonstrated longer median PFS with DD (n = 586) versus Q3W (n = 546) paclitaxel (ITT: 20.5 vs 15.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; homologous recombination proficient cancer: 15.1 vs 11.8 months, HR 0.64; BRCAwt: 18.0 vs 12.9 months, HR 0.70). Comparison between arms favored veliparib-throughout versus control in both DD (PFS, 24.2 vs 18.3 months, hazard ratio 0.67) and Q3W (19.3 vs 14.6, hazard ratio 0.69) subgroups. DD paclitaxel was associated with higher incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia, fatigue, and anemia versus Q3W. There were no differences in toxicity between gBRCAm (n = 211) and gBRCAwt (n = 902) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS DD paclitaxel was tolerable and associated with longer PFS in the HR proficient and gBRCAwt groups, versus Q3W. gBRCA status did not impact safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | | | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School UNSW, Prince of Wales Hospital and ANZGOG, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - David M O'Malley
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|