Kim DH, Choi SH, Kim DW, Lee SS, Lim YS, Kim SY, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Byun JH. Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Prognosis According to Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;
53:1803-1812. [PMID:
33565208 DOI:
10.1002/jmri.27528]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) can develop in patients with and without risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
PURPOSE
To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of cHCC-CCA in patients with and without risk factors for HCC, and to assess the influence of risk factors on patient prognosis.
STUDY TYPE
Retrospective.
POPULATION
A total of 152 patients with surgically confirmed cHCC-CCA.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE
1.5-T and 3-T/T1-weighted dual gradient-echo in- and opposed-phase, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo, diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar, and T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo contrast-enhanced sequences.
ASSESSMENT
MRI features according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and pathologic findings based on revised classification were compared between patients with and without risk factors for HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were also compared between the two groups, and factors associated with survival were evaluated.
STATISTICAL TESTS
The clinico-pathologic and MRI features of the two groups were compared using Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and chi-square tests. OS and RFS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS
cHCC-CCA in patients with risk factors were more frequently classified as LI-RADS category 4 or 5 (LR-4/5; probably or definitely HCC) (48.7%), whereas those without risk factors were more frequently classified as category M (LR-M; probably malignant, not specific for HCC) (63.6%). RFS and OS did not differ significantly according to risk factors (P = 0.63 and 0.83). Multivariable analysis showed that pathologic tumor type (hazard ratio 2.02; P < 0.05) and LI-RADS category (hazard ratio 2.19; P < 0.05) were significantly associated with RFS and OS, respectively.
DATA CONCLUSION
Although MRI features of cHCC-CCA differed significantly between patients with and without risk factors for HCC, postsurgical prognosis did not. LI-RADS category and pathologic tumor type were independently correlated with postsurgical prognosis in patients with cHCC-CCA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse