1
|
Kim SE, Burket Koltsov JC, Richards AW, Zhou J, Schadl K, Ladd AL, Rose J. Validation of Inertial Measurement Units for Analyzing Golf Swing Rotational Biomechanics. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23:8433. [PMID: 37896527 PMCID: PMC10611231 DOI: 10.3390/s23208433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
Training devices to enhance golf swing technique are increasingly in demand. Golf swing biomechanics are typically assessed in a laboratory setting and not readily accessible. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer improved access as they are wearable, cost-effective, and user-friendly. This study investigates the accuracy of IMU-based golf swing kinematics of upper torso and pelvic rotation compared to lab-based 3D motion capture. Thirty-six male and female professional and amateur golfers participated in the study, nine in each sub-group. Golf swing rotational kinematics, including upper torso and pelvic rotation, pelvic rotational velocity, S-factor (shoulder obliquity), O-factor (pelvic obliquity), and X-factor were compared. Strong positive correlations between IMU and 3D motion capture were found for all parameters; Intraclass Correlations ranged from 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89, 0.93) for O-factor to 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.00) for upper torso rotation; Pearson coefficients ranged from 0.92 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.93) for O-factor to 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.00) for upper torso rotation (p < 0.001 for all). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between the two methods; absolute mean differences ranged from 0.61 to 1.67 degrees. Results suggest that IMUs provide a practical and viable alternative for golf swing analysis, offering golfers accessible and wearable biomechanical feedback to enhance performance. Furthermore, integrating IMUs into golf coaching can advance swing analysis and personalized training protocols. In conclusion, IMUs show significant promise as cost-effective and practical devices for golf swing analysis, benefiting golfers across all skill levels and providing benchmarks for training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Eun Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
- Motion & Gait Analysis Lab, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Jayme Carolynn Burket Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
| | - Alexander Wilder Richards
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
| | - Joanne Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
| | - Kornel Schadl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
- Motion & Gait Analysis Lab, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Amy L. Ladd
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
| | - Jessica Rose
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (S.E.K.); (J.C.B.K.); (J.Z.); (K.S.); (A.L.L.)
- Motion & Gait Analysis Lab, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|