Li J, Tseng C, Yuan Y, Jiang D, Qian Z, Hu Z, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Liu Z. Determining the association between the radiographic parameters and the SRS-22 scores in Chinese female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does curve pattern matter?
Br J Neurosurg 2024;
38:349-355. [PMID:
33491493 DOI:
10.1080/02688697.2021.1875396]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 outcomes have been shown to be correlated with radiographic parameter of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A recent study suggested that curve patterns might play a role in assessing the influence of deformity on patient's reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between radiographic parameters and SRS-22 questionnaire outcomes in female patients with adolescent AIS among the Chinese population based on five curve patterns.Patients and Methods: The radiographic data and SRS-22 questionnaires of 259 female AIS patients were reviewed. Radiographic measurements included: Cobb angle of the major curve, T1 tilt angle, apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral translation (AVT), thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis. Curve patterns included single thoracic (T), single thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL), double thoracic (DT), double major (DM), and triple major (TM). The correlation between radiographic measurements and each domain in SRS-22 was determined by Pearson's correlation coefficient.Results: The curve magnitude and AVT of the major curve were found to be significantly correlated with the self-image domain in all cases (Cobb angle: r = -0.426, p = 0.002; AVT: r = -0.281, p=0.006) and in all curve patterns except for TM. Compared to other groups, the TM group had a significantly larger major curve than the DT group and TL group (p ≤ 0.004). In TM group, the self-image scores were lower than TL group (p =0.018), and the function scores were lower than that in T, TL (p < 0.001) and DM groups (p =0.013). In the DT group, the T1 tilt was significantly correlated with the self-image domain (r = -0.376, p =0.004). In the T group, coronal curve magnitude was significantly correlated with function domain (r = -0.397, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Our findings suggested curve patterns should be considered in evaluating the correlations between radiographic parameters and SRS-22 outcomes in patients with AIS.
Collapse