Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of port-wine stains in phakomatosis pigmentovascularis

BACKGROUND

Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis (PPV) is a rare congenital syndrome. Only a few studies have reported the treatment of PPV, including a case using photodynamic therapy (PDT) to treat PPV-associated port-wine stains (PWS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigating the efficacy and adverse effects of hemoporfin-PDT in PPV-associated PWS.

METHODS

The efficacy and adverse effects in patients with PPV who underwent two sessions of hemoporfin-PDT from January 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included (13 females, 7 males, age range: 2-31 years; mean: 8.20 ± 8.92 years). Two, nine, seven, and two patients had PPV types Ia, IIa, IIb, and IIIa, respectively. After two treatments, the visual evaluation indicated the color of the PWS in 4, 5, 6, and 5 patients showed poor, fair, good, and excellent improvements, respectively. The combined good and excellent improvement rates in patients with PWS and pigmentary nevus overlapping in the same treatment area and in patients with PWS in the treatment areas only were 33.3% versus 87.5%, respectively, and were significantly different (p = 0.02). Minor side effects, such as edema, scabbing, hyperpigmentation, and blistering, were observed in some patients after PDT.

CONCLUSION

Hemoporfin-PDT is an effective treatment for PPV-associated PWS. Patients with PWS and pigmentary nevus overlapping in the same treatment area showed poorer efficacy than patients with PWS in the treatment areas only.

Analysis of related factors affecting hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy for port-wine stain: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) is currently considered one of the most promising therapies for port-wine stain (PWS). However, the efficacy of this is very variable and needs further studies.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients with PWS in the face, neck, or extremities who received at least 2 HMME-PDT sessions were included in the study, and correlations of efficacy with age, gender, locations, treatment sessions, and PDL treatment history were analyzed.

RESULTS

The efficacy of HMME-PDT in patients with different ages, locations, and different numbers of prior PDL treatment showed constantly significant differences after 1/2/last session (p < .05). The number of treatments was associated with efficacy, and patients who received more than two sessions had a better response than those who underwent two sessions only (p < .001). Ordinal logistic regression analysis confirmed the above-mentioned associations. Nevertheless, patients of different sex, subtype, and lesion size showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies demonstrated that HMME-PDT is effective in the treatment of PWS. The more prior PDL treatments, older age, lips involvement, PWS on limbs were adverse factors for Hemoporfin-PDT, while multiple HMME-PDT sessions can improve effective and response rate. Besides, ambient temperature and lesions temperature should be concerned, local cooling provides some relief from pain but may influence effect.

Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy with general anesthesia showed superior efficacy in the treatment of port-wine stains: a retrospective evaluation

Background

Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for port-wine stains (PWS), and pain is the main adverse effect of this therapy. General anesthesia is commonly used for pain management during PDT, but the effect of general anesthetics on the subsequent treatment efficacy of PDT in PWS has not been reported.

Objectives

To assess the use of general anesthesia combined with PDT compared with PDT alone in 207 PWS patients, and to provide further safety and efficacy data on this combined therapy.

Methods

Propensity score matching (PSM) was used at a 2:1 ratio to create a general anesthetic group (n = 138) and a highly comparable nonanesthetic group (n = 69). The clinical outcomes were evaluated, and the treatment reactions and adverse effects were recorded after one treatment with PDT.

Results

After matching, there was no significant difference in the demographic data of the patients in the two groups (p > 0.05), while the treatment efficacy was significantly higher in the general anesthetic group than in the nonanesthetic group (76.81 vs. 56.52%, p < 0.05). Moreover, logistic regression analysis confirmed that patients receiving general anesthesia showed an association with a good response to PDT (OR = 3.06; 95% CI, 1.57-6.00; p = 0.0011). Purpura lasted longer in the general anesthetic group, but the other treatment reactions and adverse effects were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). No serious systemic adverse reactions were observed.

Conclusion

We recommend this combined therapy, which is associated with painless, as a high efficacy treatment option for PWS patients, especially for patients with a poor response to multiple PDT alone treatments.

Efficacy of influential factors in hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy for facial port-wine stains

Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) is a vascular-targeted treatment for port-wine stains (PWS). However, the efficacy of this has varied and is difficult to predict. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of influential factors associated with HMME-PDT and provide a suitable method for predicting the efficacy. Patients with facial PWS who underwent HMME-PDT were retrospective analyzed. A total of 212 patients (93 males) with mean age of 13.01 ± 12.67 years (range, 1-51) years were included. There were 143 cases with red, 56 cases with purple, and 13 cases with hypertrophic-type PWS. The number of HMME-PDT sessions ranged 1-6. The excellent response rate after 1-4 PDT sessions was 9.4%, 17.6%, 32.7%, and 42.9%, respectively. The number of PDT treatments is associated with efficacy, and patients who underwent treatment with more than three sessions had response better than those who underwent treatment with less than three sessions (p = 0.003). Response to HMME-PDT in patients of different ages, previous treatment history, lip involvement, and vessels morphology showed significant differences after two treatment sessions (p = 0.001, 0.03, 0.014, and 0.001, respectively), while patients of different sex, subtype, lesion size, location (medial, lateral, or mixed), or non-vascular morphology showed no significant differences. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that the patients with lip hypertrophy (p = 0.002), history of more than five times prior treatment (p = 0.003), fewer PDT sessions (<3) (p = 0.000002), linear vessels (p = 0.007), and reticular vessels (p = 0.0003) showed association with poor response of HMME-PDT. In conclusion, HMME-PDT is an effective treatment for PWS. Patients who had underwent treatment for more than five times prior, lip hypertrophy, and linear vessels or reticular vessels under dermoscope showed association with poor efficacy.