1
|
Lobb E, Plypoo A. Limits for the therapeutic application of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in the context of ablative lung radiotherapy near the minima of lung density and tumor size. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13634. [PMID: 35533238 PMCID: PMC9278665 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To systematically investigate the performance of the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) within the extremes of small tumor volumes and near‐minimum lung and tumor tissue densities in order to identify combinations of these parameters where the use of AAA could result in a therapeutically unacceptable loss of tumor coverage on an energy and fractionation‐specific basis. Methods Clinically appropriate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were generated with AAA for 180 unique combinations of lung density (0.05–0.30 g/cm3), tumor density (0.30–1.00 g/cm3), tumor diameter (0.5–2.5 cm), and beam energy (6 and 10 MV) and recomputed using the AcurosXB algorithm. Regression analysis was used to identify the strongest predictors of a reduction in biologically effective dose at a clinically relevant level (100 Gy BED10) for commonly utilized 1–5 fraction treatment regimens. Measurements were performed within a phantom mimicking the lower extremes of lung and tumor densities to validate AcurosXB as the approximate ground truth within these scenarios. Results The strongest predictors of a statistically significant reduction in tumor coverage were lung density ≤0.15 g/cm3, tumor diameter ≤10 mm, tumor density equal to 0.30 g/cm3, and a beam energy of 10 MV. Overestimation of clinical target volume (CTV) D95% and CTV V100Gy (BED10) by AAA can exceed 30%–40% in some scenarios. Measurements supported AcurosXB as highly accurate even for these challenging scenarios. Conclusions The accuracy of AAA rapidly diminishes near the minima of clinical lung density, particularly in combination with small tumors and when using a photon energy of 10 MV. The magnitude of the effect can be more dramatic than previously reported data suggests and could potentially compromise the ablative qualities of treatments performed within these environments, particularly with less aggressive fractionation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Lobb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ascension NE Wisconsin - St. Elizabeth Hospital, Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ahpa Plypoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ascension NE Wisconsin - St. Elizabeth Hospital, Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campos GFP, Souto ACS, Lencart JB, Cunha LPT, Dias AG. Development of an independent MU calculation software for radiotherapy treatments with stereotactic cones. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13542. [PMID: 35166027 PMCID: PMC8992931 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Development of an independent MU calculator (StereoCalc) with and without heterogeneity corrections for stereotactic treatments, in a Varian TrueBeam STx LINAC using stereotactic cones, with flattening filter‐free photon energies. Methods Multiple depth curves and output factors were measured, following the dosimetry formalism for small fields proposed by the TRS‐483. The developed StereoCalc imports and processes the beam data files and calculates the patient plans with and without heterogeneity correction. Validation of the developed software was carried out using phantoms. The accuracy of the StereoCalc software was verified in stereotactic patient plans. Results A maximum difference of 2.47% and 2.07% was obtained in the phantom validation tests with and without heterogeneity correction, respectively. The mean percentual difference of StereoCalc from cone dose calculation (CDC) in the clinical testing was 2.86% ±1.27% and 0.78% ±0.48% with and without heterogeneity correction, respectively. The largest differences found were 7.34% and 1.98%, respectively. Conclusions The results obtained in this work show that the MU calculated with StereoCalc software is in good agreement with the values calculated by the treatment planning systems, both in static fields and arcs. We have also improved the software to consider heterogeneity corrections calculations. As expected, and as a major achievement of this work, some differences were observed when heterogeneities were considered. StereoCalc proved to be a powerful tool that can be integrated into the specific quality assurance program in a medical physics department for independent verification in stereotactic treatment with cones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Catarina Santos Souto
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Joana Borges Lencart
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Paulo Teixeira Cunha
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Anabela Gregório Dias
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xue J, McKay JD, Grimm J, Cheng CW, Berg R, Grimm SYL, Xu Q, Subedi G, Das IJ. Small field dose measurements using plastic scintillation detector in heterogeneous media. Med Phys 2017; 44:3815-3820. [PMID: 28398596 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate a plastic scintillation detector for the measurement of small field dosimetry and to verify the accuracy of measured dose in comparison with Monte Carlo calculation in a heterogeneous medium. METHODS The study is performed with CyberKnife planning and delivery system. The setup consists of a custom made solid lung phantom with the insert of an Exradin W1 scintillation detector or an Exradin A16 ion chamber. The measurement was done for a series of cone sizes from 5 mm to 60 mm, and the dose was calculated by Monte Carlo algorithm in MultiPlan workstation. The difference between measurement and calculation was reported. RESULTS Our preliminary results demonstrated the applicability of plastic scintillation detectors in the measurement of small field dosimetry in a heterogeneous medium. The difference between the calculated and measured output factors was less than 3% for all cone sizes from 60 mm down to 5 mm. Without any corrections, the measured dose from the scintillation detector calibrated to the ion chamber reading was also within 3% of the Monte Carlo calculation in the lung phantom for cone sizes 20 mm or larger. CONCLUSIONS Small field dosimetry is particularly relevant to stereotactic radiation treatment. The accuracy of dose calculation for small static beams is critical to dose planning so would potentially affect the treatment outcomes in a heterogeneous medium. Our results have shown good agreement with plastic scintillation detector in both homogeneous and heterogeneous medium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinyu Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Jesse D McKay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlanger Health System, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | - Chee-Wai Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Ronald Berg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlanger Health System, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA
| | - Shu-Ya Lisa Grimm
- Academic Urology/Fox Chase Cancer Center, King of Prussia, PA, 19406, USA
| | - Qianyi Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA
| | - Gopal Subedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, ME, 04401, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prado C, Kazi A, Bennett A, MacVittie T, Prado K. Mean Organ Doses Resulting From Non-Human Primate Whole Thorax Lung Irradiation Prescribed to Mid-Line Tissue. Health Phys 2015; 109:367-373. [PMID: 26425898 PMCID: PMC4593315 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Multi-organ dose evaluations and the effects of heterogeneous tissue dose calculations have been retrospectively evaluated following irradiation to the whole thorax and lung in non-human primates (NHP). A clinical-based approach was established to evaluate actual doses received in the heart and lungs during whole thorax lung irradiation. Anatomical structure and organ densities have been introduced in the calculations to show the effects of dose distribution through heterogeneous tissue. Mean organ doses received by non-human primates undergoing whole thorax lung irradiations were calculated using a treatment planning system that is routinely used in clinical radiation oncology. The doses received by non-human primates irradiated following conventional dose calculations have been retrospectively reconstructed using computerized tomography-based, heterogeneity-corrected dose calculations. The use of dose volume descriptors for irradiation to organs at risk and tissue exposed to radiation is introduced. Mean and partial-volume doses to lung and heart are presented and contrasted. The importance of exact dose definitions is highlighted, and the relevance of precise dosimetry to establish organ-specific dose response relationships in NHP models of acute and delayed effects of acute radiation exposure is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Karl Prado
- For correspondence contact: Karl L. Prado, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene St., Suite GGJ06, , Baltimore, Maryland 21201 or
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akino Y, Das IJ, Cardenes HR, Desrosiers CM. Correlation between target volume and electron transport effects affecting heterogeneity corrections in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Radiat Res 2014; 55:754-760. [PMID: 24522269 PMCID: PMC4099989 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2013] [Revised: 11/25/2013] [Accepted: 12/28/2013] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Recently, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer is conducted with heterogeneity-corrected treatment plans, as the correction greatly affects the dose delivery to the lung tumor. In this study, the correlation between the planning target volume (PTV) and the dose delivery is investigated by separation of the heterogeneity correction effects into photon attenuation and electron transport. Under Institutional Review Board exemption status, 74 patients with lung cancer who were treated with SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. All treatment plans were generated using an anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) of an Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) treatment planning system. Two additional plans were created using the same treatment parameters (monitor units, beam angles and energy): a plan with no heterogeneity correction (NC), and a plan calculated with a pencil beam convolution algorithm (PBC). Compared with NC, AAA and PBC isocenter doses were on average 13.4% and 21.8% higher, respectively. The differences in the isocenter dose and the dose coverage for 95% of the PTV (D95%) between PBC and AAA were correlated logarithmically (ρ = 0.78 and ρ = 0.46, respectively) with PTV. Although D95% calculated with AAA was in general 2.9% larger than that for NC, patients with a small PTV showed a negative ΔD95% for AAA due to the significant effect of electron transport. The PTV volume shows logarithmic correlation with the effects of the lateral electron transport. These findings indicate that the dosimetric metrics and prescription, especially in clinical trials, should be clearly evaluated in the context of target volume characteristics and with proper heterogeneity correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi Akino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive RT 041, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive RT 041, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Higinia R Cardenes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive RT 041, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Colleen M Desrosiers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive RT 041, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Westerly DC, Mo X, Tomé WA, Mackie TR, DeLuca PM. A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries. Med Phys 2013; 40:061706. [PMID: 23718585 PMCID: PMC3676383 DOI: 10.1118/1.4804055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2012] [Revised: 03/27/2013] [Accepted: 04/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pencil beam algorithms are commonly used for proton therapy dose calculations. Szymanowski and Oelfke ["Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: An improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media," Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3313-3330 (2002)] developed a two-dimensional (2D) scaling algorithm which accurately models the radial pencil beam width as a function of depth in heterogeneous slab geometries using a scaled expression for the radial kernel width in water as a function of depth and kinetic energy. However, an assumption made in the derivation of the technique limits its range of validity to cases where the input expression for the radial kernel width in water is derived from a local scattering power model. The goal of this work is to derive a generalized form of 2D pencil beam scaling that is independent of the scattering power model and appropriate for use with any expression for the radial kernel width in water as a function of depth. METHODS Using Fermi-Eyges transport theory, the authors derive an expression for the radial pencil beam width in heterogeneous slab geometries which is independent of the proton scattering power and related quantities. The authors then perform test calculations in homogeneous and heterogeneous slab phantoms using both the original 2D scaling model and the new model with expressions for the radial kernel width in water computed from both local and nonlocal scattering power models, as well as a nonlocal parameterization of Molière scattering theory. In addition to kernel width calculations, dose calculations are also performed for a narrow Gaussian proton beam. RESULTS Pencil beam width calculations indicate that both 2D scaling formalisms perform well when the radial kernel width in water is derived from a local scattering power model. Computing the radial kernel width from a nonlocal scattering model results in the local 2D scaling formula under-predicting the pencil beam width by as much as 1.4 mm (21%) at the depth of the Bragg peak for a 220 MeV proton beam in homogeneous water. This translates into a 32% dose discrepancy for a 5 mm Gaussian proton beam. Similar trends were observed for calculations made in heterogeneous slab phantoms where it was also noted that errors tend to increase with greater beam penetration. The generalized 2D scaling model performs well in all situations, with a maximum dose error of 0.3% at the Bragg peak in a heterogeneous phantom containing 3 cm of hard bone. CONCLUSIONS The authors have derived a generalized form of 2D pencil beam scaling which is independent of the proton scattering power model and robust to the functional form of the radial kernel width in water used for the calculations. Sample calculations made with this model show excellent agreement with expected values in both homogeneous water and heterogeneous phantoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Westerly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Butts JR, Foster AE. Comparison of commercially available three-dimensional treatment planning algorithms for monitor unit calculations in the presence of heterogeneities. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2001; 2:32-41. [PMID: 11674836 PMCID: PMC5726023 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2000] [Accepted: 11/06/2000] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study uses an anthropomorphic phantom and its computed tomography (CT) data set to evaluate monitor unit (MU) calculations using the CMS Focus Clarkson, the CMS Focus Multigrid Superposition Model, the CMS Focus FFT Convolution Model, and the ADAC Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition Algorithms. Using heterogeneity corrections, a treatment plan and corresponding MU calculations were generated for several typical clinical situations. A diode detector, placed in an anthropomorphic phantom, was used to compare the treatment planning algorithms' predicted doses with measured data. Differences between diode measurements and the algorithms' calculations were within reasonable levels of acceptability as recommended by Van Dyk et al. [Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys. 26, 261-273 (1993)], except for the CMS Clarkson algorithm, which predicted too few MU for delivery of the intended dose to chest wall fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R. Butts
- Ball Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department2401 W. University AvenueMuncieIndiana47303
| | - Alvis E. Foster
- Ball Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department2401 W. University AvenueMuncieIndiana47303
| |
Collapse
|