1
|
Singh D, Gupta P, Singla-Pareek SL, Siddique KHM, Pareek A. The Journey from Two-Step to Multi-Step Phosphorelay Signaling Systems. Curr Genomics 2021; 22:59-74. [PMID: 34045924 PMCID: PMC8142344 DOI: 10.2174/1389202921666210105154808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The two-component signaling (TCS) system is an important signal transduction machinery in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, excluding animals, that uses a protein phosphorylation mechanism for signal transmission. Conclusion Prokaryotes have a primitive type of TCS machinery, which mainly comprises a membrane-bound sensory histidine kinase (HK) and its cognate cytoplasmic response regulator (RR). Hence, it is sometimes referred to as two-step phosphorelay (TSP). Eukaryotes have more sophisticated signaling machinery, with an extra component - a histidine-containing phosphotransfer (HPT) protein that shuttles between HK and RR to communicate signal baggage. As a result, the TSP has evolved from a two-step phosphorelay (His–Asp) in simple prokaryotes to a multi-step phosphorelay (MSP) cascade (His–Asp–His–Asp) in complex eukaryotic organisms, such as plants, to mediate the signaling network. This molecular evolution is also reflected in the form of considerable structural modifications in the domain architecture of the individual components of the TCS system. In this review, we present TCS system's evolutionary journey from the primitive TSP to advanced MSP type across the genera. This information will be highly useful in designing the future strategies of crop improvement based on the individual members of the TCS machinery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepti Singh
- 1Stress Physiology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India; 2Plant Stress Biology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi 110067, India; 3The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6001, Australia; 4National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Punjab, Ajitgarh 140306, India
| | - Priyanka Gupta
- 1Stress Physiology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India; 2Plant Stress Biology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi 110067, India; 3The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6001, Australia; 4National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Punjab, Ajitgarh 140306, India
| | - Sneh Lata Singla-Pareek
- 1Stress Physiology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India; 2Plant Stress Biology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi 110067, India; 3The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6001, Australia; 4National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Punjab, Ajitgarh 140306, India
| | - Kadambot H M Siddique
- 1Stress Physiology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India; 2Plant Stress Biology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi 110067, India; 3The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6001, Australia; 4National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Punjab, Ajitgarh 140306, India
| | - Ashwani Pareek
- 1Stress Physiology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India; 2Plant Stress Biology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi 110067, India; 3The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6001, Australia; 4National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Punjab, Ajitgarh 140306, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huo R, Liu Z, Yu X, Li Z. The Interaction Network and Signaling Specificity of Two-Component System in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21144898. [PMID: 32664520 PMCID: PMC7402358 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Two-component systems (TCS) in plants have evolved into a more complicated multi-step phosphorelay (MSP) pathway, which employs histidine kinases (HKs), histidine-containing phosphotransfer proteins (HPts), and response regulators (RRs) to regulate various aspects of plant growth and development. How plants perceive the external signals, then integrate and transduce the secondary signals specifically to the desired destination, is a fundamental characteristic of the MSP signaling network. The TCS elements involved in the MSP pathway and molecular mechanisms of signal transduction have been best understood in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In this review, we focus on updated knowledge on TCS signal transduction in Arabidopsis. We first present a brief description of the TCS elements; then, the protein–protein interaction network is established. Finally, we discuss the possible molecular mechanisms involved in the specificity of the MSP signaling at the mRNA and protein levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruxue Huo
- Institute of Integrative Plant Biology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Phylogenomics & Comparative Genomics, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China;
- College of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
| | - Zhenning Liu
- College of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
- Correspondence: (Z.L.); (Z.L.)
| | - Xiaolin Yu
- College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
| | - Zongyun Li
- Institute of Integrative Plant Biology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Phylogenomics & Comparative Genomics, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China;
- Correspondence: (Z.L.); (Z.L.)
| |
Collapse
|