Kaska Ł, Proczko M, Wiśniewski P, Stankiewicz M, Gill D, Śledziński Z. A prospective evaluation of the influence of three bariatric procedures on insulin resistance improvement. Should the extent of undiluted bile transit be considered a key postoperative factor altering glucose metabolism?
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2015;
10:213-28. [PMID:
26240621 DOI:
10.5114/wiitm.2015.52062]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2015] [Revised: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Insulin resistance (IR), the essential step in development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), resolves quickly after bariatric surgery, but the effectiveness depends on the type of the procedure. Although the long-term influence on IR improvement is well documented, the mechanisms of the ultra-fast response after restrictive and bypass procedures require explanation.
AIM
To determine IR evolution from the initial preparative period to 6 months after the operation, exposing the rapid postoperative response while comparing the 3 bariatric methods, with the belief that the metabolic effect may be correlated with anatomical combinations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
From January to December, 2013, a cohort of severely obese, insulin resistant individuals recruited to the prospective study underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG-30), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB-30) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-30). Main laboratory parameters of glucose metabolism were evaluated in fasting patients preoperatively, 4 days and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS
Within the whole observation period the most significant improvement in homeostasis model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR) was observed in the first 4 days after each operation. The decrease of HOMA-IR was higher (p < 0.0001) in gastric bypass groups than in patients after SG (-41%). The difference between bypass groups favors OAGB over RYGB (63 vs. -56%, p = 0.0489).
CONCLUSIONS
Among all bariatric management factors, operation type is the most important in IR improvement. The significant difference in response after SG vs. RYGB and OAGB supports the concept of metabolic competence of duodeno-jejunal exclusion. Altered bile flow after duodeno-jejunal exclusion may be responsible for enhanced glucose metabolism improvement.
Collapse