Diversity Differences Among Cardiovascular Fellowships Across Five Geographic Regions in the United States

Introduction Diversity and inclusion in cardiovascular fellowships are necessary for addressing the healthcare needs of diverse patient populations. However, regional disparities in the diversity of these programs persist, diminishing efforts to create a representative workforce. We observe the regional differences in the diversity of cardiovascular fellowship programs, focusing on gender, doctorate designation, and graduation within the United States (US) or other. We hypothesized that males, medical doctors (MD), and US graduates would be in majority across all regions. Methods Data for cardiovascular fellowships from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Database Access (FREIDA) system for the matriculation year 2022-2023 was obtained to assess the representation of male vs female gender, MD vs osteopathic doctor (DO) designation, and US vs non-US graduate. We then compared these backgrounds to five defined regions (Midwest, Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, and West) in the United States to define representation for backgrounds across geographic areas. Statistical significance was determined by p<0.05 with the use of SAS Studio 3.8, version 9.4 (Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.), and Wilson score for confidence intervals. Results We found significant disparities across all background factors for all regions. This includes that females, DOs, and non-US graduates were underrepresented among Midwest, Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, and West regions, and the p-value was <0.001 for all variations. Specifically for Midwest, the female frequency was 155 (23.81%; CI: 21, 27; p<0.001), DO frequency was 101 (15.51%; CI: 13, 19; p<0.001), and non-US graduate frequency was 206 (31.84%; CI: 28, 36; p<0.001). For Northeast, the female frequency was 231 (29.62; CI: 27, 33; p<0.001), DO frequency was 72 (9.22; CI: 7, 11; p<0.001), and non-US graduate frequency was 239 (30.68; CI 28, 34; p<0.001). For Southeast, the female frequency was 178 (25.99; CI: 23, 29; p<0.001), DO frequency was 67 (9.78; CI: 8, 12; p<0.001), and non-US graduate frequency 279 (41.46; CI: 38, 45; p<0.001). For Southwest, the female frequency was 74 (26.71; CI: 22, 32; p<0.001), DO frequency was 21 (7.58; CI 5, 11; p<0.001), and non-US graduate frequency was 110 (39.71; CI: 34,46; p<0.001). For West, the female frequency was 107 (31.75; CI 27, 37; p<0.001), DO frequency was 15 (4.45; CI: 3, 7; p<0.001), and non-US graduate frequency was 54 (16.07; CI: 13, 20; p<0.001). Conclusion We emphasize the regional disparities for females, DOs, and non-US graduates within cardiovascular fellowships in the past matriculation year. Understanding that we have not reached diversity goals allows for further reflection and implementation of targeted interventions and initiatives aimed at promoting equal opportunities for applicants. This is true for all regions of the United States. By addressing these disparities, fellowship programs can more effectively mirror the diverse patient populations they serve and foster a healthcare environment that is inclusive and accommodating. This, in turn, contributes to the overall enhancement of healthcare outcomes.

The Pass/Fail Effect: A Longitudinal Study of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Performance Over a Decade

Objectives This study aimed to analyze the impact of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transition to a pass/fail scoring system in 2022 on the performance of first-time test takers in three distinct groups: Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) and Doctor of Medicine (MD) examinees from US/Canadian schools and examinees from non-US/Canadian schools. The analysis spans a decade-long period from 2012 to 2022, offering insights into the implications of this pivotal change in medical education. Methods We analyzed the performance of first-time USMLE Step 1 examinees from US/Canadian MD and DO programs and non-US/Canadian schools from 2012 to 2022, including the transition year to a pass/fail scoring system. Data were obtained from USMLE performance data reports and organized into annual contingency tables. Descriptive statistics and comparative analysis were used to identify trends and differences in performance across the groups. Data visualization techniques were employed to illustrate these findings, and the results were contextualized within the broader changes in medical education. Results In 2021, first-time takers from US/Canadian MD and DO Degree programs had pass rates of 96% and 94%, respectively, while non-US/Canadian schools had a pass rate of 82%. However, in 2022, these rates dropped to 93%, 89%, and 74%, respectively. The most significant relative decline was observed among non-US/Canadian Schools' first-time takers, with an 8% decrease. Repeaters consistently had lower pass rates across all groups. Conclusion The study reveals a notable decline in pass rates following the transition to pass/fail scoring, although this is based on just one year of data. This underscores the importance of students not rushing into the exam and dedicating sufficient time for preparation. The potential impact of this research could be transformative for medical education, but more years of data post-transition will be needed to confirm these initial findings. These findings serve as a reminder that the change in scoring does not diminish the rigor of the exam, prompting students to approach their studies with diligence and patience and potentially paving the way for systemic improvements in medical education and healthcare delivery worldwide.

International Medical Graduates' perceptions about residency training experience: a qualitative study

Objectives

To explore International Medical Graduates residents' experiences and perspectives of their residency training program.

Methods

This qualitative study was conducted at a large research-intensive University. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit 14 International medical graduates. The residents recruited for this study were at different levels in their training ranging from Postgraduate year one to five. Residents interviewed represented seven unique specialties. Each trainee was interviewed, and the data were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis framework was used to conduct the data analysis, resulting in the development of study themes.

Results

Our analysis generated six main themes. These themes were related to costly decisions, unspoken expectations, the stigma associated with being an IMG, fears of being an IMG, the strength and resilience of IMGs, and recommen-dations proposed by IMGs for program improvement.

Conclusions

In this study, we wanted to explore international residents' experiences with their programs. The experience of each individual international resident is unique. However, in this study, we were able to provide firsthand perceptions of IMGs from a research-intensive university and identified common themes experienced and perceived by our resi-dents. This study's findings may help educate, reduce stigma, and guide the implementation of effective individu-al and systemic support for these trainees. Which in turn will enhance the overall educational experiences for IMGs trainees. Our study found that themes seem to be recur-ring, hence, an urgency to bring about appropriate chang-es, equitable opportunities, and support for IMGs.

Healthcare Access in Medically Underserved Areas During the COVID-19 Era: An International Medical Graduate Perspective From a Rural State

Background Physician shortage and healthcare access are serious issues in rural states like Kentucky and further worsened during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. International Medical Graduates (IMGs) serve the underserved communities of Kentucky to fill in the physician gap. However, uncertainties surrounding immigration policies added significant challenges to physicians and the rural communities served by them during the pandemic. Methods A survey was created using the data collection platform "SurveyMonkey" and sent to IMG physicians practicing on a visa to understand their role and their immigration-related challenges. Only the physicians practicing in Kentucky were included in this study. Results It was found that 84% practice in primary care specialties like internal medicine, pediatrics, or family medicine, 92.9% practice in Medically Underserved Areas or Health Professional Shortage Areas, and 71.4% practice in rural settings. Also, 61.5% practice in a "frontline" COVID-19 specialty and 92.3% were involved in direct care of COVID-19 infected or suspected patients. Of the physicians, 88.5% were in an "immigration backlog"; 92.6% of them were the primary visa holders of their families and 88.9% expressed concern that their families face hardship if they have a disability during the pandemic. It was reported by 92.3% of them that visa-related restrictions limited them from providing additional coverage in these places. Conclusions Lack of physician access is a critical issue facing many rural states in America like Kentucky, and IMG physicians play a valuable role in taking care of this underserved population and fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. The challenges surrounding the immigration backlog are contributing to significant hardships and remain a hurdle to expand healthcare access to the rural and medically underserved communities.