Punding in Parkinson's Disease: An Update

Background

Punding is a stereotyped behavior characterized by an intense fascination with a complex, excessive, non-goal oriented, repetitive activity affecting individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) on dopamine replacement therapy (DRT).

Objectives

In 2010, we published the first review focused on the pathophysiology of punding. This study aims to systematically review the literature of the past decade on punding in PD, particularly focusing on the clinical features, underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and APA PsycInfo for articles published between July 1, 2010 and March 19, 2022. The search strategy included: (punding) AND (parkinson*).

Results

Of 256 studies identified, 29 were eligible for inclusion with 19 original research articles and 10 case reports. This review confirmed that predictors of punding in PD are higher doses of DRT, younger age, male sex, and increasing disease severity. We also found an association between punding and psychiatric and/or cognitive symptoms. Neuroimaging studies have showed that punding in PD is associated with a disconnection between midbrain, limbic and white matter tracts projecting to the frontal cortices and a breakdown of the connectivity among the crucial nodes of the reward circuit. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been shown to produce a transient beneficial effect in PD patients with punding.

Conclusion

In conclusion, although the clinical features of punding have been established, in the past 12 years, we gained a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of punding, mainly thanks to magnetic resonance imaging techniques.

Nigrostriatal and Mesolimbic D2/3 Receptor Expression in Parkinson's Disease Patients with Compulsive Reward-Driven Behaviors

The nigrostriatal and mesocorticolimbic dopamine networks regulate reward-driven behavior. Regional alterations to mesolimbic dopamine D_2/3 receptor expression are described in drug-seeking and addiction disorders. Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are frequently prescribed D₂-like dopamine agonist (DAgonist) therapy for motor symptoms, yet a proportion develop clinically significant behavioral addictions characterized by impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs). Until now, changes in D_2/3 receptor binding in both striatal and extrastriatal regions have not been concurrently quantified in this population. We identified 35 human PD patients (both male and female) receiving DAgonist therapy, with (n = 17) and without (n = 18) ICBs, matched for age, disease duration, disease severity, and dose of dopamine therapy. In the off-dopamine state, all completed PET imaging with [¹⁸F]fallypride, a high affinity D₂-like receptor ligand that can measure striatal and extrastriatal D_2/3 nondisplaceable binding potential (BP_ND). Striatal differences between ICB+/ICB- patients localized to the ventral striatum and putamen, where ICB+ subjects had reduced BP_ND In this group, self-reported severity of ICB symptoms positively correlated with midbrain D_2/3 receptor BP_ND Group differences in regional D_2/3 BP_ND relationships were also notable: ICB+ (but not ICB-) patients expressed positive correlations between midbrain and caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, and amygdala BP_NDs. These findings support the hypothesis that compulsive behaviors in PD are associated with reduced ventral and dorsal striatal D_2/3 expression, similar to changes in comparable behavioral disorders. The data also suggest that relatively preserved ventral midbrain dopaminergic projections throughout nigrostriatal and mesolimbic networks are characteristic of ICB+ patients, and may account for differential DAgonist therapeutic response.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The biologic determinants of compulsive reward-based behaviors have broad clinical relevance, from addiction to neurodegenerative disorders. Here, we address biomolecular distinctions in Parkinson's disease patients with impulsive compulsive behaviors (ICBs). This is the first study to image a large cohort of ICB+ patients using positron emission tomography with [18F]fallypride, allowing quantification of D_2/3 receptors throughout the mesocorticolimbic network. We demonstrate widespread differences in dopaminergic networks, including (1) D2-like receptor distinctions in the ventral striatum and putamen, and (2) a preservation of widespread dopaminergic projections emerging from the midbrain, which is associated with the severity of compulsive behaviors. This clearly illustrates the roles of D_2/3 receptors and medication effects in maladaptive behaviors, and localizes them specifically to nigrostriatal and extrastriatal regions.

Mesocorticolimbic hemodynamic response in Parkinson's disease patients with compulsive behaviors

BACKGROUND

PD patients treated with dopamine therapy can develop maladaptive impulsive and compulsive behaviors, manifesting as repetitive participation in reward-driven activities. This behavioral phenotype implicates aberrant mesocorticolimbic network function, a concept supported by past literature. However, no study has investigated the acute hemodynamic response to dopamine agonists in this subpopulation.

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that dopamine agonists differentially alter mesocortical and mesolimbic network activity in patients with impulsive-compulsive behaviors.

METHODS

Dopamine agonist effects on neuronal metabolism were quantified using arterial-spin-labeling MRI measures of cerebral blood flow in the on-dopamine agonist and off-dopamine states. The within-subject design included 34 PD patients, 17 with active impulsive compulsive behavior symptoms, matched for age, sex, disease duration, and PD severity.

RESULTS

Patients with impulsive-compulsive behaviors have a significant increase in ventral striatal cerebral blood flow in response to dopamine agonists. Across all patients, ventral striatal cerebral blood flow on-dopamine agonist is significantly correlated with impulsive-compulsive behavior severity (Questionnaire for Impulsive Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease- Rating Scale). Voxel-wise analysis of dopamine agonist-induced cerebral blood flow revealed group differences in mesocortical (ventromedial prefrontal cortex; insular cortex), mesolimbic (ventral striatum), and midbrain (SN; periaqueductal gray) regions.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that dopamine agonist therapy can augment mesocorticolimbic and striato-nigro-striatal network activity in patients susceptible to impulsive-compulsive behaviors. Our findings reinforce a wider literature linking studies of maladaptive behaviors to mesocorticolimbic networks and extend our understanding of biological mechanisms of impulsive compulsive behaviors in PD. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

A Retrospective Evaluation of the Frequency of Impulsive Compulsive Behaviors in Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated with Continuous Waking Day Apomorphine Pumps

Background

Impulsive compulsive behaviors (ICBs) can have a deleterious impact on the lives of patients with PD with orally active dopamine agonist treatment recognized as the greatest risk factor. However, the relationship between subcutaneous administration of the dopamine agonist, apomorphine, and impulsive compulsive behaviors is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 28 advanced PD patients treated with subcutaneous waking day apomorphine ambulatory minipumps at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (London, UK).

Results

Twelve of the patients had experienced impulsive compulsive behaviors before starting apomorphine. Reduction of oral dopamine agonist dose before apomorphine had led to complete resolution in 6 cases with no recurrence on long-term apomorphine maintenance therapy. Six patients still had active impulsive compulsive behaviors when apomorphine was started. Four of these improved, and in the other 2 there was no worsening. Of the 16 patients with no previous history of impulsive compulsive behaviors who started apomorphine, only 1, who was still receiving concurrent levodopa, developed impulsive compulsive behaviors.

Conclusions

These data provide preliminary evidence that continuous apomorphine pump therapy has a lower proclivity to trigger or exacerbate impulsive compulsive behaviors than oral dopamine agonists. This is likely to be attributed to a more tonic stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors leading to desensitisation, but could also be attributed to a different pharmacological profile of apomorphine compared with orally active dopamine agonists. Apomorphine can be considered as a treatment option in patients who have developed disabling impulsive compulsive behaviors on oral agonist therapy whose motor handicap cannot be controlled adequately on l-dopa alone. Further prospective studies are needed to provide a definitive answer to this question.

Do Parkinson's Disease Patients Have Deficits in Sequential Sampling Tasks?

The aim of this study was to assess the neuropsychological behavior of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with addictive behaviors. Characteristically, these patients have younger onset of PD, higher novelty-seeking personality traits, jump to conclusions, and often make irrational choices. We assessed whether PD patients with and without addictive behaviors have deficits in a sequential sampling task, often called the secretary problem. In this task, participants needed to pick the best out of multiple offers. Critically, once participants rejected a deal, this option became unavailable. Thus, decisions needed to be balanced not to stop too soon or sample for too long and miss the best deal. We tested 13 PD patients with and 13 patients without addictive behaviors. Results were compared to healthy volunteers. We found that all patients declined fewer options before committing to a deal. There was, however, no difference between the two patient groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in overall choice rank between patients and controls. These results suggest that, compared to controls, PD patients gather less evidence before committing to an offer, but have no deficits in recognizing the best deal out of many options, regardless of whether or not they have addictive behaviors.