The Contribution of 18F FDG PET-CT for the Investigation of Fever of Unknown Origin and Inflammation of Unknown Origin

BACKGROUND

Fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin are highly challenging diagnostic conditions. The current practice for evaluating patients is to conduct a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan as either a first- or a second-line modality. We aimed to assess the contributory effect of PET-CT to the diagnosis and compare it with the contributory effect of CT alone.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included all cohorts that examined the contribution of PET-CT to the investigation of classical fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin. The primary outcome was the contribution of PET-CT to the final diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT and CT scans, and contribution of a CT scan. We pooled the results of all studies and calculated the pooled contributory effect of PET-CT.

RESULT

Thirty-six studies (3516 patients) were included in the systematic review. The pooled contribution of PET-CT was 75.4%. The compiled sensitivity and specificity values for all studies were 85.9% and 59.5%, respectively. Five studies (405 patients) compared between the PET-CT component and the total body CT component. The pooled contribution of a CT scan was 68%. The summed sensitivity and specificity values of a CT scan for all studies were 63.1% and 84.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PET-CT has a contributory effect of 75% for the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin. PET-CT had superior sensitivity and inferior specificity vs the CT scan.

Development of a Consensus-Based List of Potential Quality Indicators for Fever and Inflammation of Unknown Origin

With a growing emphasis on value-based reimbursement, developing quality indicators for infectious diseases has gained attention. Quality indicators for fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin are lacking. An assembled group of international experts developed 12 quality measures for these conditions, which could be validated with additional study.

FDG PET in Evaluation of Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a diagnostic challenge, with its cause remaining undiagnosed in approximately half of patients. Nuclear medicine tests typically are performed after a negative or inconclusive initial workup. Gallium-67 citrate and labeled leukocytes were previous mainstays of radionuclide imaging for FUO, although they had limited diagnostic performance. FDG PET/CT has subsequently emerged as the nuclear medicine imaging test of choice, supported by a growing volume of evidence. A positive FDG PET/CT result contributes useful information by identifying potential causes of fever, localizing sites for further evaluation, and guiding further management; a negative result contributes useful information by excluding focal disease as the cause of fever and predicts a favorable prognosis. In 2021, CMS rescinded a prior national noncoverage determination for FDG PET for infection and inflammation, leading to increasing national utilization of FDG PET/CT for FUO workup. This article reviews the current status of the role of FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with FUO. The literature reporting the diagnostic performance and yield of FDG PET/CT in FUO workup is summarized, with comparison with historically used nuclear medicine tests included. Attention is also given to the test's clinical impact; protocol, cost, and radiation considerations; and application in children.

Diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in inflammation of unknown origin: A clinical series of 317 patients

BACKGROUND

Inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) is a challenging situation in internal medicine.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the final diagnoses in IUO and assess the helpfulness of ¹⁸ F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnosis strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 317 IUO patients with ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT were enrolled. A diagnosis was reached in 228 patients: noninfectious inflammatory diseases (NIID) (37.5%), infectious diseases (18.6%), malignancies (7.9%), and non-systemic-inflammatory miscellaneous diseases (7.9%). The two leading causes of NIID were polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT results were classified as true positive in 49.8% of patients and contributory in 75.1% of overall IUO patients (after the complete investigation set and a prolonged follow-up). In multivariate analysis, only C-reactive protein minimum level (≥50 mg/L) was associated with the contributory status of ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

Within the wide spectrum of IUO underlying diseases, ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT is helpful to make a diagnosis and to eliminate inflammatory diseases. Obese patients constitute a specific group needing further studies.

The Diagnostic Value of Fluoro-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT in Fever or Inflammation of Unknown Origin: A Retrospective Study at a Rheumatology Clinic

Introduction Further diagnostic procedures are necessary for patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) and unknown cause of inflammation (inflammation of unknown origin - IUO) for the identification of the definitive diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution and roles of F-18 FDG PET/CT (fluoro-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography) in the diagnostic process of patients with FUO/IUO. Methods The data of 58 patients who had F-18 FDG PET/CT scans for FUO/IUO were re-evaluated retrospectively. The relationships between definitive diagnosis and fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value) were examined. Results  Rheumatic disease was diagnosed in 26 patients (44.5%), malignancy in 20 patients (34.5%), and infectious diseases in six patients (10.3%). The most prevalent rheumatic disease in patients with FUO/IUO was systemic vasculitis (n:10, 17.2%), especially large vessel vasculitis. There were 37 patients (63.7%) with clinically significant true positive fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. True positive fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was significantly higher in patients diagnosed with malignancy (85%, 17/20 patients) compared to other diagnoses. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake above physiological levels was determined in 15 of the 26 patients (57.6%) diagnosed with rheumatic diseases. Conclusion The results of this study showed that F-18 FDG PET/CT is a useful imaging modality in FUO/IUO patients, who present a challenging diagnostic process for clinicians. In addition to malignancies, the presence of chronic inflammatory diseases, especially early period systemic vasculitis, were diagnosed in these patients.

Inflammation of Unknown Origin: Evaluation and Prognosis of 57 Cases

(1) Background: there are few studies on the inflammation of unknown origin (IUO). We sought to determine the etiologies and prognosis of IUO, as well as the contribution of complementary examinations. (2) Methods: this retrospective study analyzed patients meeting the Vanderschueren’s criteria in the Hospices Civils de Lyon from 2005 to 2020. (3) Results: a total of 57 patients (mean age: 67 years; interquartile range: 55–79) were included. Final diagnoses were made for 26 (46%) patients. Non-infectious inflammatory diseases were the most common diagnoses (13/26, 50%), followed by neoplasms (10/26, 38%; 8/10 hematological malignancies), infections (2/26, 8%), and miscellaneous causes (1/26, 4%). Moreover, 18-FDG-PET/CT was contributory in 12/42 cases. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, serology, temporal biopsies, and bone marrow aspirates were contributory in 3/41, 1/57, 5/23, and 3/19 cases, respectively. At last follow-up (mean follow-up duration: 48 months), 8/31 undiagnosed patients were cured (five received an empirical treatment), and 5/31 died (one death was related to the empirical treatment). (4) Conclusion: more than half of the IUO remained undiagnosed. Non-infectious inflammatory diseases and hematological malignancies were the most common etiologies. Moreover, 18-FDG-PET/CT had the highest diagnostic value. Most IUO without final diagnosis persisted. The role of empirical treatments remains to be explored.

Contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a case-mix of fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are challenging medical problems. Previous studies have shown that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) plays an important role in the diagnosis of FUO, but few studies have explored this diagnostic technique in relation to IUO.

PURPOSE

To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published data on the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the diagnosis of FUO and IUO.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines published in March 2018. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratification based on study design, number of patients, geographic area, and final diagnosis based on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Meta-regression analyses were performed to recognize heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 23 studies, comprising a total sample size of 1927 patients. The pooled diagnosis performance was calculated with a per-patient-based analysis: sensitivity = 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-0.89), specificity = 0.63 (95% CI = 0.49-0.75), positive likelihood ratio = 2.3 (95% CI = 1.5-3.4), negative likelihood ratio = 0.25 (95% CI = 0.16-0.38), diagnostic odds ratio = 9 (95% CI = 4.0-20), and AUC = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.81-0.87).

CONCLUSION

In patients with non-specific symptoms and signs, 18F-FDG PET/CT is very helpful for recognizing and excluding diseases, directing further diagnostic decisions, and avoiding unnecessary invasive examinations. We recommend that 18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered among the first-line diagnostic tools for patients with FUO and IUO.

Contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a case-mix of fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are challenging medical problems. Previous studies have shown that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) plays an important role in the diagnosis of FUO, but few studies have explored this diagnostic technique in relation to IUO.

PURPOSE

To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published data on the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the diagnosis of FUO and IUO.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines published in March 2018. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratification based on study design, number of patients, geographic area, and final diagnosis based on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Meta-regression analyses were performed to recognize heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 23 studies, comprising a total sample size of 1927 patients. The pooled diagnosis performance was calculated with a per-patient-based analysis: sensitivity = 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-0.89), specificity = 0.63 (95% CI = 0.49-0.75), positive likelihood ratio = 2.3 (95% CI = 1.5-3.4), negative likelihood ratio = 0.25 (95% CI = 0.16-0.38), diagnostic odds ratio = 9 (95% CI = 4.0-20), and AUC = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.81-0.87).

CONCLUSION

In patients with non-specific symptoms and signs, 18F-FDG PET/CT is very helpful for recognizing and excluding diseases, directing further diagnostic decisions, and avoiding unnecessary invasive examinations. We recommend that 18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered among the first-line diagnostic tools for patients with FUO and IUO.

The value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in identifying the cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO): data from a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are diagnostically challenging conditions. Diagnosis of underlying disease may be improved by ¹⁸F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET).

METHODS

Prospective study to test diagnostic utility of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in a large cohort of patients with FUO or IUO and to define parameters that increase the likelihood of diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. Patients with FUO or IUO received ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scanning in addition to standard diagnostic work-up. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT results were classified as helpful or non-helpful in establishing final diagnosis. Binary logistic regression was used to identify clinical parameters associated with a diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.

RESULTS

240 patients were enrolled, 72 with FUO, 142 with IUO and 26 had FUO or IUO previously (exFUO/IUO). Diagnosis was established in 190 patients (79.2%). The leading diagnoses were adult-onset Still's disease (15.3%) in the FUO group, large vessel vasculitis (21.1%) and polymyalgia rheumatica (18.3%) in the IUO group and IgG₄-related disease (15.4%) in the exFUO/IUO group. In 136 patients (56.7% of all patients and 71.6% of patients with a diagnosis), ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT was positive and helpful in finding the diagnosis. Predictive markers for a diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT were age over 50 years (p=0.019), C-reactive protein (CRP) level over 30 mg/L (p=0.002) and absence of fever (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scanning is helpful in ascertaining the correct diagnosis in more than 50% of the cases presenting with FUO and IUO. Absence of intermittent fever, higher age and elevated CRP level increase the likelihood for a diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.

18F-FDG-PET/CT in unexplained elevated inflammatory markers. Joining entities

The diagnostic strategy in patients with fever or inflammation of unknown origin remains a major clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with unexplained elevated C-reactive protein with or without fever. Contribution of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT to the final diagnosis was evaluated. In addition we determined whether a differentiation between patients with or without fever is clinically reasonable.

PATIENTS, METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 72 consecutive patients with unexplained elevated C-reactive protein levels (above 8mg/l) that underwent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in our facility between 10/2009 and 11/2012. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT was considered a so-called diagnostic scan when results decisively led to a final diagnosis and adequate therapy with a response of symptoms was initiated due to the PET/CT result.

RESULTS

In 60/72 patients (83%) a final diagnosis was established. Diagnoses included infections (58%), non-infectious inflammatory diseases (29%) and malignancies (8%). ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT was true positive in 47 cases (65%) and the diagnostic scan in 29 patients (40%). Sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT was 81% and specificity was 86%. Diagnostics, final diagnoses, ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT results, SUVmax, C-reactive protein levels and the diagnostic scan did not differ significantly between patients with fever and patients without fever.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT is a useful method in the diagnostic workup of patients with inflammation of unknown origin. In our series there was no significant difference between patients with or without fever. Regarding ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT-imaging inflammation of unknown origin and unexplained fever can be joined to one entity.