1
|
McNamara IN, Wellman SM, Li L, Eles JR, Savya S, Sohal HS, Angle MR, Kozai TDY. Electrode sharpness and insertion speed reduce tissue damage near high-density penetrating arrays. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:026030. [PMID: 38518365 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad36e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Over the past decade, neural electrodes have played a crucial role in bridging biological tissues with electronic and robotic devices. This study focuses on evaluating the optimal tip profile and insertion speed for effectively implanting Paradromics' high-density fine microwire arrays (FμA) prototypes into the primary visual cortex (V1) of mice and rats, addressing the challenges associated with the 'bed-of-nails' effect and tissue dimpling.Approach. Tissue response was assessed by investigating the impact of electrodes on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cellular damage, with a specific emphasis on tailored insertion strategies to minimize tissue disruption during electrode implantation.Main results.Electro-sharpened arrays demonstrated a marked reduction in cellular damage within 50μm of the electrode tip compared to blunt and angled arrays. Histological analysis revealed that slow insertion speeds led to greater BBB compromise than fast and pneumatic methods. Successful single-unit recordings validated the efficacy of the optimized electro-sharpened arrays in capturing neural activity.Significance.These findings underscore the critical role of tailored insertion strategies in minimizing tissue damage during electrode implantation, highlighting the suitability of electro-sharpened arrays for long-term implant applications. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities associated with high-channel-count microelectrode array implantation, emphasizing the importance of meticulous assessment and optimization of key parameters for effective integration and minimal tissue disruption. By elucidating the interplay between insertion parameters and tissue response, our study lays a strong foundation for the development of advanced implantable devices with a reduction in reactive gliosis and improved performance in neural recording applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid N McNamara
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Steven M Wellman
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Lehong Li
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - James R Eles
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Sajishnu Savya
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | | | | | - Takashi D Y Kozai
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Center of the Basis of Neural Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- NeuroTech Center, University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Apollo NV, Murphy B, Prezelski K, Driscoll N, Richardson AG, Lucas TH, Vitale F. Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:041002. [PMID: 32759476 PMCID: PMC8152109 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abacd7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Implantable neuroelectronic interfaces have enabled breakthrough advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders, as well as in fundamental studies of brain function, behavior, and disease. Intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) mapping with stereo-EEG (sEEG) depth electrodes is routinely adopted for precise epilepsy diagnostics and surgical treatment, while deep brain stimulation has become the standard of care for managing movement disorders. Intracortical microelectrode arrays for high-fidelity recordings of neural spiking activity have led to impressive demonstrations of the power of brain-machine interfaces for motor and sensory functional recovery. Yet, despite the rapid pace of technology development, the issue of establishing a safe, long-term, stable, and functional interface between neuroelectronic devices and the host brain tissue still remains largely unresolved. A body of work spanning at least the last 15 years suggests that safe, chronic integration between invasive electrodes and the brain requires a close match between the mechanical properties of man-made components and the neural tissue. In other words, the next generation of invasive electrodes should be soft and compliant, without sacrificing biological and chemical stability. Soft neuroelectronic interfaces, however, pose a new and significant surgical challenge: bending and buckling during implantation that can preclude accurate and safe device placement. In this topical review, we describe the next generation of soft electrodes and the surgical implantation methods for safe and precise insertion into brain structures. We provide an overview of the most recent innovations in the field of insertion strategies for flexible neural electrodes such as dissolvable or biodegradable carriers, microactuators, biologically-inspired support structures, and electromagnetic drives. In our analysis, we also highlight approaches developed in different fields, such as robotic surgery, which could be potentially adapted and translated to the insertion of flexible neural probes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas V Apollo
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration, and Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America
| | - Brendan Murphy
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration, and Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Kayla Prezelski
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration, and Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Nicolette Driscoll
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration, and Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America
| | - Andrew G Richardson
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
| | - Timothy H Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
| | - Flavia Vitale
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Center for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration, and Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America
- These authors contributed equally
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|