Surgical treating lumbar intraspinal tumor through a para-split laminotomy

BACKGROUND

to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of para-split laminotomy in the treatment of lumbar intraspinal tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively review the clinical data of 15 patients suffering lumbar intraspinal tumors, who underwent tumor resection using the para-split laminotomy, from October 2016 to May 2018. Observation indicators were as follows: (1) surgical and postoperative recovery situations; (2) the neurological function of the spinal cord and the follow-up situations.

RESULTS

Mean blood loss was 95.3 ± 58.2 ml, and the mean duration of the surgical procedure was 176.7 ± 35.2 min. All lumbar intraspinal tumors were resected completely. There were no operative complications. The postoperative CT scans showed no pedicle or vertebral fractures. During the follow-up period of 6-18 months (average 10.8 ± 3.9 months), no tumor recurrence or spinal deformation was found according to the imaging examination. CT 3D reconstructions showed that the split laminae tended to heal. The average preoperative JOA score was 15.5 ± 4.9 and the average postoperative JOA score improved to 24.0 ± 3.5 (average improvement rate 65.9 ± 19.6%).

CONCLUSION

The para-split laminotomy could reduce the damage to the posterior spinal tension band and help to protect the stability of the spine. It is feasible and effective to apply the para-split laminotomy to the operation of a lumbar intraspinal tumor, and this technique may be a promising option when considering surgical methods for some multilevel well-circumscribed intraspinal tumors.

Clinical and Biomechanical Study of Laminoplasty for Thoracic and Lumbar Intradural Tumors

(1) Background: Primary intraspinal tumors account for 2-15% of all central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Most intraspinal tumors are benign, and about 40% of them occur intradurally, for which early surgery is the preferred treatment. Laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation is the conventional surgical treatment. However, laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation is likely to reduce the spinal range of motion (ROM), with many other complications, although it can maintain the stability of the spine. The aim of this study is to determine whether laminoplasty as a new surgical approach for thoracic and lumbar intradural tumors is superior to laminectomy in preserving spinal ROM, maintaining spinal stability and reducing postoperative complications. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients who received intradural tumor resection, including 23 who received traditional laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation and 27 who received new laminoplasty. Spinal ROM was evaluated by lumbar flexion/extension radiograph and biomechanical evaluation. Spinal stability was evaluated by imaging observations of the spinal Cobb angle and laminar bone fusion. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and the length of hospital stay. (3) Results: Compared with the laminectomy group, patients in the laminoplasty group exhibited a better spinal ROM (31.6 ± 12.0° vs. 21.7 ± 11.8°, p = 0.013), a smaller Cobb angle (9.6 ± 4.3 vs. 12.5 ± 5.3, p = 0.034), a lower incidence of CSF leakage (4/14.8% vs. 11/47.8%, p = 0.015), and a shorter length of hospital stay (13.1 ± 1.8 vs. 15.1 ± 2.3 days, p = 0.001). Most patients in the laminoplasty group had satisfactory bone fusion. The biomechanical experiment also demonstrated that spinal ROM in laminoplasty was larger than that in the laminectomy group. (4) Conclusions: Compared with the traditional surgery, the new laminoplasty surgery can better maintain the stability of the spine, preserve spinal ROM, and reduce postoperative complications. It is a surgical method that can be clinically popularized.

Clinical outcomes of posterior laminectomy and pedicle screw fixation for upper cervical intraspinal tumors: a case series

Objective

This study was performed to introduce posterior laminectomy and pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of upper cervical spinal cord tumors and investigate the curative effects.

Methods

Eighteen patients (11 men, 7 women) who underwent surgical treatment of an upper cervical intraspinal tumor from January 2008 to June 2013 were reviewed. Clinical parameters including age, sex, affected spinal levels, lesion location, duration and type of symptoms, and pathological features were retrospectively investigated.

Results

The mean operation time was 181.9 ± 25.5 minutes (range, 135–240 minutes), and the mean blood loss volume was 1038.9 ± 284.2 mL (range, 750–1530 mL). The Frankel grade, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and Karnofsky performance status score were significantly better postoperatively than preoperatively. The radiographic examination revealed good bone graft fusion. Two patients developed tumor recurrence, while four patients developed intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Management of upper cervical intraspinal tumors by posterior laminectomy and pedicle screw fixation can relieve compression of the cervical cord and nerve root, thoroughly remove the tumor lesion, reconstruct the stability of the upper cervical spine, and improve patients’ quality of life.