Han J, Pan H, Yao L, Jin E, Pan W, Xiong L. Comparison of microsurgical clipping with
intravascular interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms and risk factors for intraoperative rupture and bleeding.
Am J Transl Res 2023;
15:3451-3459. [PMID:
37303682 PMCID:
PMC10251033]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effectiveness of microsurgical clipping compared with intravascular interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms and the risk factors for intraoperative rupture and bleeding.
METHODS
The data of 116 patients with ruptured aneurysms admitted to the People's Hospital of China Three Gorges University from January 2020 to March 2021 were collected for retrospective analysis. Among them, 61 cases with microsurgical clipping were classified as the control group (CG), and the rest 55 with intravascular interventional embolization were the observation group (OG), and the treatment effects in the two groups were compared. The general conditions of operation (operation time, postoperative hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss) were compared between the two groups. The intraoperative rupture of cerebral aneurysm during operation was counted, and the incidence of complications between the groups was compared. Risk factors affecting intraoperative rupture of cerebral aneurysms were analyzed by logistic regression.
RESULTS
The total clinical treatment efficiency was dramatically higher in the OG than that in the CG (P<0.05). The operative time, postoperative hospital stays, and intraoperative bleeding were all higher in the CG than those in the OG (all P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of wound infection, hydrocephalus, and cerebral infarction between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, the incidence of intraoperative rupture was markedly higher in the CG than that in the OG (P<0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, history of hypertension, large diameter of aneurysm, irregular morphology, and anterior communicating artery aneurysm were independent risk factors for intraoperative rupture in patients.
CONCLUSION
Intravascular interventional embolization for middle cerebral artery aneurysm rupture is a less invasive procedure with faster recovery time, and history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, history of hypertension, large diameter of aneurysm, irregular morphology, and anterior communicating artery aneurysm are independent risk factors affecting patients with intraoperative rupture.
Collapse