OCTA Signal Quality Augmentation Using the Isometric Handgrip Test to Maximize Vascular Flow (SQUEEZE): A Randomized Crossover Trial

Purpose

To determine if performing the isometric handgrip test (IHGT) can augment optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) vascular signal quality in eyes with macular abnormalities.

Methods

A randomized, single-blinded crossover trial was conducted including 36 participants with macular abnormalities, randomized to undergo OCTA with or without the IHGT, then crossed over to the alternate "intervention" after 1 minute. The primary outcome was OCTA signal quality after 1 minute of squeezing at 50% maximum grip strength. Secondary outcomes were other measures of vascular flow and systemic blood pressure (BP), also regressed against person- and eye-level covariables.

Results

Primary analysis of OCTA signal quality with versus without the IHGT was nonsignificant (P = 0.73). Nested analyses showed that the IHGT resulted in increased OCTA B-scan retinal vascular flow signal (2.95 [-1.64 to 7.55] Δ%, P < 0.05) and increased systolic BP, diastolic BP, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure (4.94 [0.41 to 9.47] to 12.38 [8.01 to 16.75] mm Hg, P < 0.05). OCTA signal quality and en face vessel density and perfusion changes were associated with sex, refraction, race/ethnicity, and right-hand IHGT use (P < 0.05). Greater increases in systolic and diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure were generally associated with right-hand IHGT use and greater maximum grip strength (P < 0.09).

Conclusions

The IHGT can temporarily increase OCTA B-scan retinal vascular flow signal in participants with macular abnormalities. IHGT-induced changes to systemic BP appear to be linked to absolute (rather than relative) grip strength, implying that the IHGT may be ineffective with low grip strength. Further research in larger populations is warranted.

Translational Relevance

This study provides early validation that the IHGT may augment OCTA output, which may lead to improved noninvasive detection of pathologic vascular changes.

Exercise testing-based algorithms to diagnose McArdle disease and MAD defects

OBJECTIVE

As exercise intolerance and exercise-induced myalgia are commonly encountered in metabolic myopathies, functional screening tests are commonly used during the diagnostic work-up. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of isometric handgrip test (IHT) and progressive cycle ergometer test (PCET) to identify McArdle disease and myoadenylate deaminase (MAD) deficiency and to propose diagnostic algorithms using exercise-induced lactate and ammonia variations.

METHODS

A prospective sample of 46 patients underwent an IHT and a PCET as part of their exercise-induced myalgia and intolerance evaluation. The two diagnostics tests were compared against the results of muscle biopsy and/or the presence of mutations in PYGM. A total of 6 patients had McArdle disease, 5 a complete MAD deficiency (MAD absent), 12 a partial MAD deficiency, and 23 patients had normal muscle biopsy and acylcarnitine profile (disease control).

RESULTS

The two functional tests could diagnose all McArdle patients with statistical significance, combining a low lactate variation (IHT: <1 mmol/L, AUC = 0.963, P < .0001; PCET: <1 mmol/L, AUC = 0.990, P < .0001) and a large ammonia variation (IHT: >100 μmol/L, AUC = 0.944, P = .0005; PCET: >20 μmol/L, AUC = 1). PCET was superior to IHT for MAD absent diagnosis, combining very low ammonia variation (<10 μmol/L, AUC = 0.910, P < .0001) and moderate lactate variation (>1 mmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

PCET-based decision tree was more accurate than IHT, with respective generalized squared correlations of 0.796 vs 0.668. IHT and PCET are both interesting diagnostic tools to identify McArdle disease, whereas cycle ergometer exercise is more efficient to diagnose complete MAD deficiency.