The impact of general anesthesia on mother-infant bonding for puerperants who undergo emergency cesarean deliveries

Background Mother-infant bonding is an emerging perinatal issue. While emergency cesarean deliveries are associated with a risk of bonding disorders, the mode of anesthesia used for emergency cesarean deliveries has never been studied in this context. We aimed to investigate the impact of administering general anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia to women undergoing cesarean deliveries on mother-infant bonding. Methods This was a retrospective, propensity score-matched multivariable analysis of 457 patients who underwent emergency cesarean deliveries between February 2016 and January 2019 at a single teaching hospital in Japan. The Mother-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) scores at hospital discharge and the 1-month postpartum outpatient visit were evaluated in the general anesthesia and the neuraxial anesthesia groups. A high score on the MIBS indicates impaired mother-infant bonding. Results The primary outcome was the MIBS score at hospital discharge in propensity score-matched women. After propensity score matching, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] MIBS scores were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group than those in the neuraxial anesthesia group at hospital discharge [2 (1-4) vs. 2 (0-2); P = 0.015] and at the 1-month postpartum outpatient visit [1 (1-3) vs. 1 (0-2); P = 0.046]. In linear regression analysis of matched populations, general anesthesia showed a significant and positive association with the MIBS scores at hospital discharge [beta coefficient 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.147-1.59); P = 0.019] but not at the 1-month postpartum outpatient visit [0.455 (-0.134 to 1.044); P = 0.129]. Conclusion General anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery is an independent risk factor associated with impaired mother-infant bonding.

Assisted reproductive technologies are slightly associated with maternal lack of affection toward the newborn: The Japan Environment and Children's Study

AIM

To evaluate the association between use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and mother-to-infant bonding.

METHODS

Using nationwide birth cohort study with periodical follow-ups for mothers and children during pregnancy and at 1 year after delivery, mothers were classified following three groups; infertility group with ART: 2792 mothers; infertility group with non-ART treatment (ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination): 3835 mothers and unaided pregnancy group: 78 726 mothers. Data on maternal and child health as well as basic characteristics were collected via medical records and self-administered questionnaires. The Japanese version of Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale was used to evaluate maternal bonding style. To evaluate the association between ART and maternal bonding toward babies, multivariate analysis was used with adjustment for potential confounders such as babies' sex, socio-economic status and history of maternal mental disorders.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that ART was slightly but significantly associated with an increased risk of maternal lack of affection toward their newborn (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.20), while non-ART was significantly associated with both maternal lack of affection and anger/rejection toward the newborn. No substantial association was observed between ART and overall Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale score (adjusted odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.12). Very slight negative correlations were observed between poor mother-to-infant bonding and good infant mental and physical development at both 6 months and 1 year.

CONCLUSION

ART may exert a negative influence on maternal emotion after delivery, but this does not have strong correlation with child development evaluated by mothers.