Proactive esophageal cooling during laser cardiac ablation: A computer modeling study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laser ablation is increasingly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, atrioesophageal injury remains a potentially serious complication. While proactive esophageal cooling (PEC) reduces esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation, the effects of PEC during laser ablation have not previously been determined. We aimed to evaluate the protective effects of PEC during laser ablation of AF by means of a theoretical study based on computer modeling.

METHODS

Three-dimensional mathematical models were built for 20 different cases including a fragment of atrial wall (myocardium), epicardial fat (adipose tissue), connective tissue, and esophageal wall. The esophagus was considered with and without PEC. Laser-tissue interaction was modeled using Beer-Lambert's law, Pennes' Bioheat equation was used to compute the resultant heating, and the Arrhenius equation was used to estimate the fraction of tissue damage (FOD), assuming a threshold of 63% to assess induced necrosis. We modeled laser irradiation power of 8.5 W over 20 s. Thermal simulations extended up to 250 s to account for thermal latency.

RESULTS

PEC significantly altered the temperature distribution around the cooling device, resulting in lower temperatures (around 22°C less in the esophagus and 9°C in the atrial wall) compared to the case without PEC. This thermal reduction translated into the absence of transmural lesions in the esophagus. The esophagus was thermally damaged only in the cases without PEC and with a distance equal to or shorter than 3.5 mm between the esophagus and endocardium (inner boundary of the atrial wall). Furthermore, PEC demonstrated minimal impact on the lesion created across the atrial wall, either in terms of maximum temperature or FOD.

CONCLUSIONS

PEC reduces the potential for esophageal injury without degrading the intended cardiac lesions for a variety of different tissue thicknesses. Thermal latency may influence lesion formation during laser ablation and may play a part in any collateral damage.

Left atrial roof region ablation using a visually guided laser balloon

Balloon-based catheter ablation including visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) has been adopted a first line therapeutic strategy for the patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, the roof area ablation beyond pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon has been described as an effective therapy for the patients with persistent AF. However, the roof area ablation performed with a VGLB remains unknown. In this case, we report the case of roof area ablation for the patient with persistent AF using a VGLB.

Endoscopic view of the vertebra during laser balloon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Key Clinical Message

Left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter. Laser balloon ablation is effective because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy.

Abstract

When performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency, left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter because of the movement of the ablation point. Laser balloon ablation is effective for the achievement of durable PVI in cases with such anatomical characteristics because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy.

laser balloon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Background

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA) are two innovative ways for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation and laser balloon ablation in patients with AF.

Methods

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science and other databases for comparative trials comparing CB and LB ablation in the treatment of AF, from establishment of database to August, 2023.

Results

A total of 13 studies and 3,582 patients were included (CBA, n = 2,308; LBA, n = 1,274). There was no difference between CBA and LBA in acute PVI rate per vein, 12-months recurrence rate of AF, 12-months recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmia, occurrence rate of pericardial tamponade, occurrence rate of inguinal complications. LBA presented a lower acute PVI rate per patients (CBA 97.0% vs. LBA 93.4%, RR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07). Transient nerve palsy was more likely to occur after CBA (CBA 2.7% vs. LBA 0.7%, RR = 4.25, 95%CI: 2.06-8.76). However, the occurrence of persistent nerve palsy between CBA and LBA groups were similar (CB 1.4% vs. LB 1.0%, RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.55-2.14). In terms of procedural duration, the procedural time of CBA was shorter than that of LBA (WMD = -26.58, 95%CI: -36.71-16.46).

Conclusions

Compared with LBA, CBA had a shorter procedural duration. There was a higher incidence of transient but not persistent phrenic nerve palsy after CBA.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=272607 Identifier (CRD42021272607).

Feasibility of energy-guided short duration protocol of laser balloon based pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (EG-Laser Study)

BACKGROUND

Laser balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (LB-PVI) is available for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The lesion size depends on laser energy; however, the default protocol is not an energy-based setting. We hypothesized that an energy-guided (EG) short-duration protocol may be an alternative to shorten the procedure time without affecting efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the EG short-duration protocol (EG group) (target energy 120 J/site [12W/10s; 10W/12s; 8.5W/14s; 5.5W/22s]) compared with the default protocol (control group) (12W/20s; 10W/20s; 8.5W/20s; 5.5W/30s).

RESULTS

A total of 52 consecutive patients (EG: n = 27 [103veins] and control: n = 25 [91veins]) undergoing LB-PVI (64 ± 10 years, 81% male, 77% paroxysmal) were enrolled. The EG group had a shorter total time in the pulmonary vein (PV) (43.0 ± 13.9 min vs. 61.1 ± 16.0 min, p < .0001), a shorter total laser application time (1348 ± 254 sec vs. 2032 ± 424 sec, p < .0001), and lower total laser energy (12455 ± 2284J vs. 18084 ± 3746J, p < .0001). There was no difference in the total number of laser applications (p = 0269) or first-pass isolation (p = .725). Acute reconduction was identified only in one vein in the EG. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of pinhole rupture (7.4% vs. 4%, p = 1.000) or phrenic nerve palsy (3.7% vs. 12%, p = .341). During a mean follow-up of 13.5 ± 6.1 months, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (p = .227).

CONCLUSION

LB-PVI with the EG short-duration protocol may be achieved in a shorter procedure time to avoid deterioration of efficacy and safety. The EG protocol is feasible as a novel point-by-point manual laser-application approach.

A Pilot Trial to Compare the Long-Term Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation with High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Versus Laser Energy with Rapid Ablation Mode

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is the major cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The probability of reconnection is higher if the primary lesion is not sufficiently effective, which can be unmasked with an adenosine provocation test (APT). High-power short-duration radiofrequency energy (HPSD) guided with ablation index (AI) and the third generation of the visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) are new methods for PVI.

METHODS

A total of 70 participants (35 in each group) who underwent a PVI with either AI-guided HPSD (50 W; AI 500 for the anterior and 400 for the posterior wall, respectively) or VGLB ablation were included in this observational pilot trial. Twenty minutes after each PVI, an APT was performed. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival from AF after three years.

RESULTS

A total of 137 (100%) PVs in the HPSD arm and 131 PVs (98.5%) in the VGLB arm were initially successfully isolated (p = 0.24). The overall procedure duration was similar in both arms (155 ± 39 in HPSD vs. 175 ± 58 min in VGLB, p = 0.191). Fluoroscopy time, left atrial dwelling time and duration from the first to the last ablation were longer in the VGLB arm (23 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 3 min, p < 0.001; 157 (111-185) vs. 134 (104-154) min, p = 0.049; 92(59-108) vs. 72 (43-85) min, p = 0.010). A total of 127 (93%) in the HPSD arm and 126 (95%) PVs in the VGLB arm remained isolated after APT (p = 0.34). The primary endpoint was met 1107 ± 68 days after ablation in 71% vs. 66% in the VGLB and HPSD arms, respectively (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD and VGLB did not differ with respect to long-term outcome of PVI. A large, randomized study should be conducted to compare clinical outcomes with respect to these new ablation techniques.

Preclinical evaluation of semi-automated laser ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Visually-guided laser balloon ablation (VGLA) currently requires careful manual rotation of the laser to create overlapping lesions. A novel semi-automated VGLA may reduce ablation times and lesion gaps. We aimed to compare semi-automated (SA) VGLA to that of manual (MN) VGLA.

METHODS

Acute: Nine swine underwent right superior pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either SA (n = 3, 13-18 W), MN (n = 3, 8.5-12 W), or radiofrequency (RF, n = 3, 25-40 W) and were killed acutely. Chronic: 16 swine, underwent PVI using either SA (n = 8, 15 W) or MN (n = 8, 10 W), and were survived for 1 month before being killed. All hearts were then submitted for pathological evaluation.

RESULTS

Acute: PVI was successful in all 9/9 swine with lesion counts significantly lower in the SA arm (5.3 ± 5.9, 33.7 ± 10.0, and 28.0 ± 4.4 in SA, MN, and RF arms; p = .007 for SA and MN). At necropsy, circumferentiality and transmurality were 98% and 94% in SA, 98% and 80% in MN, and 100% and 100% in RF arms. A single steam pop was noted on sectioning in the SA arm swine and occurred in the high dose (18 W) strategy. Chronic: PVI was acutely successful in 16/16 swine with no difference in PVI durability rates (62.5% vs. 75.0%), lesion transmurality (95.8 ± 17.4% vs.91.9 ± 25.9%), and circumferentiality (95.8 ± 6.6% vs. 94.8 ± 6.3%) between SA and MN arms. Catheter use time and lesion counts were lower in the SA arm compared to the MN arm (11.5 ± 12.7 vs. 21.8 ± 3.8 min, p = .046 and 4.8 ± 3.83 vs. 35.4 ± 4.4, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Motor-assisted semi-automated laser balloon ablation can improve upon procedural efficiency by reducing ablation time.

Laser balloon in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Visually guided laser balloon (LB) catheter has been an established modality dedicated for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. The newly updated version of this novel device has technically evolved recent years.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the contemporary technical evolution of LB catheter. Available efficacy outcomes and the historical change of ablation style will be evaluated. Furthermore, the future perspectives for clinical practice are discussed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The initial LB ablation system provided comparable clinical results in PV isolation with other technologies, but with a unique strategical concept enabling the direct visualization of the tissue to cauterize. With multigenerational development, the LB catheter has been equipped with more compliant balloon for favorable PV occlusion and a robotically motor driven continuous ablation mode (RAPID mode). These technical innovations changed the concept of the ablation strategy using LB catheter as 'point-by-point' into 'single-shot' fashion. The remaining tasks are further improvements such as equipping with real-time recording system of intracardiac electrogram, durable structured balloon and the instrument for visualizing the cauterization area in a 360-degree panoramic view, which includes potential possibilities to develop this novel device to the more optimal device for PV isolation.

Single-sweep pulmonary vein isolation using the new third-generation laser balloon-Evolution in ablation style using endoscopic ablation system

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic ablation system (EAS) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The novel X3 EAS is now equipped with a contiguous circumferential ablation mode (RAPID mode).

AIM

To determine the feasibility of single-shot fashioned ablation using X3.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation using X3 were enrolled. We assessed the acute procedural data focusing on "Single-sweep PVI" defined as successful PVI with a single RAPID mode energy application, and on "first-pass isolation" defined as successful PVI after initial circular lesion set.

RESULTS

One hundred AF patients (56% male, age: 68 ± 10 years, 66% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. A total of 379 of 383 PVs (99%) were isolated with X3. Single-sweep PVI and first-pass-isolation were achieved in 214 PVs (56%) and in 362 PVs (95%), respectively. Single-sweep PVI rates varied across PVs with higher rates at the superior PVs (61.2% vs. inferior PVs: 49.5%, p = .0239) and at PVs with maximal ostial diameter <24 mm (57.6% vs. >24 mm: 36.8%, p = .0151). The mean total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 43.0 ± 10 and 4.0 ± 2 min, respectively. In none of the patients an acute thromboembolic event (stroke or transient ischemic attack) or a pericardial effusion/tamponade occurred. A single transient phrenic nerve palsy was observed.

CONCLUSION

The new X3 EAS allows for single-shot fashioned ablation in terms of single-sweep PVI in half or more of PVs. The new RAPID ablation mode leads to an improved rate of first-pass isolation associated with very short procedure times without compromising safety.

Comparison of dragging ablation and point-by-point ablation with a laser balloon on linear lesion formation

INTRODUCTION

Lesion size and continuity in dragging laser balloon (LB) ablation, which may enable fast and durable pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation, are unknown. We evaluated the differences in size and continuity of linear lesions formed by dragging ablation and conventional point-by-point ablation using an LB in vitro model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Chicken muscles were cauterized using the first-generation LB in dragging and point-by-point fashion. Dragging ablation was manually performed with different dragging speeds (0.5-2°/s) using an overlap ratio of the beginning and last site during one application at 12 W/20 s and 8.5 W/30 s. Point-by-point ablation was performed with 25% and 50% overlap ratios at six energy settings (5.5 W/30 s to 12 W/20 s). Lesion depth, width, and continuity were compared. Lesion continuity was assessed by the surface and deep visible gap degree categorized from 1 (perfect) to 3 (poor). Twenty lesions were evaluated for each ablation protocol. Lesion depth and width in dragging ablation at high power (12 W) were comparable with most measurements in point-by-point ablation. Lesion depth and width were smaller at faster-dragging speed and lower power (8.5 W) in dragging ablation. The surface visible gap degree was better in dragging ablation at all dragging speeds than a 25% overlapped point-by-point ablation (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Dragging LB ablation at high power provides deep and continuous linear lesion formation comparable with that of point-by-point LB ablation. However, lesion depth and width depending on the dragging speed and power.

Comparison between minimal fluoroscopy and conventional approaches for visually guided laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation ablation

INTRODUCTION

Although balloon-based techniques, such as the laser balloon (LB) ablation have simplified pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), procedural fluoroscopy usage remains higher in comparison to radiofrequency PVI approaches due to limited 3-dimensional mapping system integration.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 consecutive patients were randomly assigned in alternating fashion to a low fluoroscopy group (LFG; n = 25) or conventional fluoroscopy group (CFG; n = 25) and underwent de novo PVI procedures using visually guided LB technique.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics or cross-overs between treatment groups. Acute PVI was accomplished in all patients. Mean follow up was 318 ± 69 days. Clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after PVI was similar between groups (CFG: 19% vs LFG: 15%; P = .72). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the LFG than the CFG (1.7 ± 1.4  vs 16.9 ± 5.9 minutes; P < .001) despite similar total procedure duration (143 ± 22 vs 148 ± 22 minutes; P = .42) and mean LA dwell time (63 ± 15 vs 59 ± 10 minutes; P = .28). Mean dose area product was significantly lower in the LFG (181 ± 125 vs 1980 ± 750 μGym² ; P < .001). Fluoroscopy usage after transseptal access was substantially lower in the LFG (0.63 ± 0.43 vs 11.70 ± 4.32 minutes; P < .001). Complications rates were similar between both groups (4% vs 2%; P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that LB PVI can be safely achieved using a novel low fluoroscopy protocol while also substantially reducing fluoroscopy usage and radiation exposure in comparison to conventional approaches for LB ablation.

Near-zero Fluoroscopic Approach for Laser Balloon Pulmonary Vein Isolation Ablation: A Case Study

Fluoroscopy remains a cornerstone imaging modality for catheter placement and positioning in electrophysiology device and ablation procedures. However, efforts are being made to reduce the cumulative exposure to radiation in the patient and physician alike. We present the case of a 59-year-old male patient with hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent successful near-fluoroless laser balloon (LB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation. Though this case demonstrates the usage of a novel protocol for near-fluoroless LB ablation that resulted in successful, uncomplicated acute PVI, the feasibility and safety of this technique should be validated in a larger series or prospective comparative study.

Laser balloon ablation for AF: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The HeartLight laser balloon ablation system was US Food and Drug Administration approved in 2016 for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but there have been numerous single-center and multicenter studies published reporting its outcomes, in addition to a few randomized trials. We aimed to systematically review and synthesize currently published outcome data on AF ablation using the laser balloon ablation system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies of AF ablation performed using the laser balloon ablation system. Human studies reporting acute procedural results with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. Outcomes of interest included acute and 12-month procedural efficacy, safety, and procedure duration. Aggregated data were analyzed with random effects models, using a Bayesian hierarchical approach. We identified 17 published manuscripts comprising a sample of 1188 patients (mean age 61 years, 80% paroxysmal). At procedure end, 98.8% of targeted pulmonary veins were successfully isolated. The pooled estimate for 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia without use of antiarrhythmic drugs for patients with paroxysmal AF was 74.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9% to 86.4%), and for all AF types combined was 72.9% (65.3% to 79.9%). The most commonly reported procedural complication was phrenic nerve injury (pooled incidence 2.6%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 3.9%), which resolved during follow-up in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Laser balloon ablation is highly effective at achieving pulmonary vein isolation. Although comparisons are mainly indirect, safety and 12-month efficacy compare favorably with those observed using other currently used AF ablation technologies.