1
|
Almansouri NE, Bakkannavar S, Faheem Y, Jaiswal A, Shergill K, Boppana K, Nath TS. Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor and Its Renal Outcome in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Cureus 2024; 16:e54501. [PMID: 38516430 PMCID: PMC10955452 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and imposes a significant financial burden on healthcare systems globally. Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), a novel neuroendocrine inhibitor, is frequently used in treating HF. However, there is still limited understanding regarding how it compares to other neuroendocrine inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The purpose of this research is to present the most recent data regarding the efficacy and renal impact of ARNIs in the treatment of HF in comparison to ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Several large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have recently been conducted to evaluate the benefits of this drug in patients with different types of HF, regardless of their renal status. We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Google Scholar, to find relevant RCTs. The efficacy outcome was a composite of the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, the frequency of HF hospitalizations (HFH), and alterations in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. The renal outcome was impairment of renal function. This systematic review analyzed large-scale RCTs involving 17,327 participants, with an average follow-up time of approximately 2.9 years. sacubitril/valsartan showed notable improvements compared to ACEis and ARBs in the following areas: reduction in NT-proBNP levels, prevention of further deterioration in renal function, and decreased hospitalizations for HF. Interestingly, there is no increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular causes with sacubitril or valsartan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naiela E Almansouri
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
- Internal Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, LBY
| | - Saloni Bakkannavar
- Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Youmna Faheem
- Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Amisha Jaiswal
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Kainaat Shergill
- Surgery, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, IND
| | - Kusalik Boppana
- Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, He Q, Mo DC, Chen L, Lu JL, Li RX, Huang J. The angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor, LCZ696, in heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30904. [PMID: 36254034 PMCID: PMC9575833 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND LCZ696 is a novel neuroendocrine inhibitor that has been widely used in heart failure (HF). However, its advantage over other neuroendocrine inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to provide the latest evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 as compared to other ACEis and ARBs with regards to the treatment of HF. METHODS We systematically searched databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcome measures included all-cause mortality, rate of hospitalizations for HF, rate of death from cardiovascular causes, change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and decline of renal function. RESULTS Five RCTs involving 19,078 patients were identified. The meta-analysis indicated that LCZ696 was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.93; P = .0005), rate of hospitalizations for HF (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87; P < .00001), reduction in NT-proBNP levels (rate ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88; P < .0001), and decline in renal function (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88; P < .0001) compared with ACEis and ARBs. However, there was no statistical difference in the rate of death from cardiovascular causes (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.03; P = .09) between LCZ696 and ACEis and ARBs. CONCLUSION LCZ696 is superior to ACEis and ARBs in the treatment of HF. Hence, it should be more widely used clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Chen
- Department of Geriatrics, Wuxiang Branch of Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- *Correspondence: Yan Chen, Department of Geriatrics, Wuxiang Branch of Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Jinxiang avenue No.99, Nanning, Guangxi, China (e-mail: )
| | - Qian He
- Department of Geriatrics, Wuxiang Branch of Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Dun-Chang Mo
- Radiotherapy Department, Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Long Chen
- ENT & HN Surgery Department, Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jia-Lu Lu
- Department of Geriatrics, Wuxiang Branch of Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Rui-Xing Li
- Department of Geriatrics, Wuxiang Branch of Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Department of Geriatrics, Wuxiang Branch of Nanning Second People’s Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wei Z, Zhang M, Zhang Q, Gong L, Wang X, Wang Z, Gao M, Zhang Z. A narrative review on sacubitril/valsartan and ventricular arrhythmias. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29456. [PMID: 35801732 PMCID: PMC9259167 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Sacubitril/valsartan, the first angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration for marketing, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and improve symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. However, some researchers have also found that sacubitril/valsartan has an antiarrhythmic effect. The mechanism by which sacubitril/valsartan reduces the mortality associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias is not precise. Many studies have concluded that ventricular arrhythmia is associated with a reduction in myocardial fibrosis. This article reviews the current understanding of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the reduction of ventricular arrhythmia and explains its possible mechanisms. The results of this study suggest that sacubitril/valsartan reduces the occurrence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Meanwhile, sacubitril/valsartan may reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias by affecting 3 pathways of B-type natriuretic peptide, Angiotensin II, and Bradykinin. The conclusion of this study is that sacubitril/valsartan reduces the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks and ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyang Wei
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Meiwei Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Linan Gong
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xiangyu Wang
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Zanzan Wang
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ming Gao
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Zhiguo Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
- * Correspondence: Zhiguo Zhang, MD, Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND LCZ696 has been introduced in patients with hypertension in several trials. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect and safety of LCZ696 in hypertensive patients. METHODS PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect and safety of LCZ696 in hypertension patients. The last search date was October 31, 2018. RESULTS Nine RCTs with 6765 subjects were finally included, in which 8 trials compared the effect and safety between LCZ696 and angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs). Evidences showed LCZ696, compared with ARBs, achieved a better blood pressure control rate (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.35), specifically, LCZ696 were better at reducing systolic blood pressure [WMD -4.11 mmHg, 95% CI: (-5.13, -3.08) mmHg], diastolic blood pressure [WMD -1.79 mmHg, 95% CI: (-2.22, -1.37) mmHg], mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure [WMD -3.24 mmHg, 95% CI: (-4.48, -1.99) mmHg] and mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure [WMD -1.25 mmHg, 95% CI: (-1.81, -0.69) mmHg]. There was no difference in the events of adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 1.01, 95% CI: 0.39-1.09), serious adverse events (RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.52-1.22) and discontinuation of treatment for any adverse events (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56-1.11) between LCZ696 group and ARB/placebo group, except LCZ696 reduced the rate of headaches (RR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-0.99) while increased cough (RR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.11-4.04; P = .02; I = 25%). CONCLUSION Our finding provides evidence that LCZ 696 was more effective than ARB on blood pressure control and was safe enough in patients with hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiongqiong Li
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Lina Li
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Fanghao Wang
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Tianjin Chest Hospital
| | - Yipeng Guo
- Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin Public Health Bureau, Tianjin
| | - Fuzhen Wang
- Department of Statistics, Fenyang Hospital of Shanxi Province, Fenyang, China
| | - Youxia Liu
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Junya Jia
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Shan Lin
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Filippatos G, Farmakis D, Parissis J, Lekakis J. Drug therapy for patients with systolic heart failure after the PARADIGM-HF trial: in need of a new paradigm of LCZ696 implementation in clinical practice. BMC Med 2015; 13:35. [PMID: 25849438 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0272-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 01/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart failure represents a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in older people and despite significant therapeutic advances, it is still characterized by important unmet needs, thus remaining a challenging field of clinical research. The recent PARADIGM-HF trial compared the novel compound LCZ696, a combination of the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan and the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril, versus the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in 8,442 patients with symptomatic chronic systolic heart failure. LCZ696 led to a 20% reduction in the rate of death or hospitalization for heart failure and a 16% reduction in the rate of all-cause death compared to enalapril at 3.5 years of follow-up. Despite those impressive results, the clinical application of this novel agent that requires the substitution of a cornerstone of current heart failure therapy, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, should follow careful steps as imposed by the study design, the recruited population and the outcome in specific patient subgroups. Further insights into the effects of LCZ696 will be provided by the ongoing PARAGON-HF trial in patients with diastolic heart failure.
Collapse
|