A MicroCT Study on Mineral Change over Time Associated with Demineralisation in Primary Teeth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the change in demineralisation depth (DD)and mineral density (MD) over time in primary teeth exposed to a demineralisation protocol with microcomputed tomography (microCT).

METHODS

Caries lesions were artificially induced on the labial surfaces of 9 primary incisors by way of a demineralisation protocol using 0.1 M lactic acid with 10% methylcellulose gel for 7 and 14 days. The specimens were scanned with microCT and CTAn software (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to analyse the changes in DD and MD. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Pearson bivariate correlation were used and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The DD ranged from 0.00 to 0.99 μm (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 0.70 ± 0.43 μm) at baseline, 11.18 to 29.5 μm (18.15 ± 5.23 μm) at 7 days and 18.00 to 55.30 μm (34.20 ± 8.70 μm) at 14 days. The MD for all specimens (n = 9) ranged from 1.48 to 1.76 g/cm3 (1.65 ± 0.08 g/cm3) at baseline, from 1.47 to 1.74 g/cm3 (1.62 ± 0.08 g/cm3) at 7 days demineralisation and 1.33 to 1.72 g/cm3 (1.54 ± 0.13 g/cm3) at 14 days. There were statistically significant differences in DD (P < 0.001) and MD (P = 0.016) between different durations of demineralisation.

CONCLUSION

DD and MD change with time after being exposed to demineralising solution. MicroCT is a nondestructive method that allows repeated MD evaluations of the same sample.

Electrode Contact Force-Controlled Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation: Different Effects on Lesion Size between Dual- and Single-Bath Preparations

BACKGROUND

During bipolar (BIP) radiofrequency (RF) ablation using two catheters in humans, each catheter is placed in separate cardiac chambers or spaces. We developed a contact force-controlled experimental preparation, and compared measurements made with two catheters placed in a single bath (SB), versus each catheter placed in separate baths, in order to assess the preparation-dependent differences in the results of BIP-RF ablation.

METHODS

In the SB experiments, a porcine heart was placed in the center of the bath, while in the dual-bath (DB) experiments, it was placed between two half baths communicating through windows.

RESULTS

The initial impedance was greatest (110.5 ± 7.2 Ω) with the BIP-DB, followed by the BIP-SB (92.0 ± 5.6 Ω) and the unipolar (UNIP) DB (84.9 ± 4.7 Ω) configurations. During 50-W ablation for 60 seconds at a 20-g contact force, the root mean square voltage was 75.7 ± 2.5 V in the BIP-DB, 68.0 ± 2.1 V in the BIP-SB, and 66.8 ± 2.0 V in the UNIP-DB. The mean surface lesion diameters were similar among the three configurations. However, the endocardial lesion depth was 5.60 ± 0.56 mm with the BIP-DB, 4.71 ± 0.64 mm with the BIP-SB, and 4.24 ± 0.58 mm with the UNIP-DB configuration. On average, the endocardial lesions were significantly deeper than the epicardial ones.

CONCLUSIONS

BIP ablation created much deeper lesions as compared to UNIP ablation. Lesion depth could be different depending on experimental preparation, and contact force-controlled DB preparation may be a much more appropriate model for studying the effects of BIP ablation.

Gap size and wall lesion development next to composite

This in situ study investigated whether there is a relationship between gap size and wall lesion development in dentin next to 2 composite materials, and whether a clinically relevant threshold for the gap size could be established. For 21 days, 14 volunteers wore a modified occlusal splint containing human dentin samples with 5 different interfaces: 4 gaps of 50 µm, 100 µm, 200 µm, or 400 µm and 1 non-bonded interface without a gap. Eight times a day, the splint with samples was dipped in a 20% sucrose solution for 10 minutes. Before and after caries development, specimens were imaged with transversal wavelength-independent microradiography (T-WIM), and lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) were calculated at the 5 different interfaces. After correction for the confounder location (more mesial or distal), a paired t test clustered within volunteers was performed for comparison of gap widths. Results showed no trend for a relationship between the corrected lesion depth and the gap size. None of the differences in lesion depth for the different gap sizes was statistically significant. Also, the composite material (AP-X or Filtek Supreme) gave no statistically significant differences in lesion depth and mineral loss. A minimum gap size could not be established, although, in a non-bonded interface without a measurable gap, wall lesion development was never observed.