Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey in United States Military Service Members and Veterans

The Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS) is a recently developed and promising new self-report measure of lifetime blast exposure (LBE). However, there are no studies that have examined the psychometric properties of the BETS, which currently limits its clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the BETS by comparing the BETS Generalized Blast Exposure Value (GBEV) to six variables hypothesized to be associated with LBE (i.e., single-item LBE, combat exposure, years in the military, number of combat deployments, and military occupation specialty [MOS]) and three variables hypothesized not to be associated with LBE (i.e., age at the time of injury, estimated pre-morbid Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient [FSIQ], and resilience). Participants were 202 United States service members and veterans prospectively enrolled from three military medical treatment facilities (68.7%) and via community recruitment initiatives (31.3%). Participants completed the BETS, Combat Exposure Scale (CES), Deployment Risk and Resiliency Inventory-2 Combat Experiences (DRRI-2 CE), Traumatic Brain Injury-Quality of Life Resilience scale, and a brief structured interview. For some analyses, participants were classified into two blast risk MOS groups: high (n = 89) and low (n = 94). The BETS GBEV was not significantly correlated with all three non-blast related variables (rs = 0.01 to rs = -0.12). In contrast, GBEV was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with all blast-related variables; single-item LBE (rs = 0.76), CES (rs = 0.58), number of combat deployments (rs = 0.53), DRRI-2 CE (rs = 0.48), and high blast risk MOS (r = 0.36, medium effect size). However, a stronger relationship was found between the blast-related variables and three modified GBEV scores when excluding some small weapons categories; single-item LBE (rs = 0.80-0.82), CES (rs = 0.64-0.67), number of combat deployments (rs = 0.56), DRRI-2 CE (rs = 0.51-0.53), and high blast risk MOS (r = 0.42-0.49, medium-large effect size). This is the first study to examine the psychometric properties of the BETS. Overall, these results offer support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the BETS. In order to ensure that the BETS can be confidently used as a valid and reliable measure of LBE, more research is needed to further examine the psychometric properties of the test, particularly with regard to the establishment of test-retest reliability.

High Lifetime Blast Exposure Using the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey Is Associated With Worse Warfighter Brain Health Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

The purpose of this study was to extend previous research by examining the relationship between lifetime blast exposure and neurobehavioral functioning after mild TBI (MTBI) by (a) using a comprehensive measure of lifetime blast exposure, and (b) controlling for the influence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants were 103 United States service members and veterans (SMVs) with a medically documented diagnosis of MTBI, recruited from three military treatment facilities (74.8%) and community-based recruitment initiatives (25.2%, e.g., social media, flyers). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures 12 or more months post-injury (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD-Checklist PCLC, TBI-Quality of Life), including the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS). The sample was classified into two lifetime blast exposure (LBE) groups: High (n = 57) and Low (n = 46) LBE. In addition, the sample was classified into four LBE/PTSD subgroups: High PTSD/High LBE (n = 38); High PTSD/Low LBE (n = 19); Low PTSD/High LBE (n = 19); and Low PTSD/Low LBE (n = 27). The High LBE group had consistently worse scores on all neurobehavioral measures compared with the Low LBE group. When controlling for the influence of PTSD (using ANCOVA), however, only a handful of group differences remained. When comparing measures across the four LBE/PTSD subgroups, in the absence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., Low PTSD), participants with High LBE had worse scores on the majority of neurobehavioral measures (e.g., post-concussion symptoms, sleep, fatigue). When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, the High LBE subgroup consistently had a greater number of clinically elevated scores compared with the Low LBE subgroup for the majority of comparisons (i.e., four to 15 or more elevated symptoms). In contrast, in the presence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., High PTSD), there were no differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for all measures. When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, however, there were meaningful differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for those comparisons that included a high number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., six to 10 or more), but not for a low number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., one to five or more). High LBE, as quantified using a more comprehensive measure than utilized in past research (i.e., BETS), was associated with worse overall neurobehavioral functioning after MTBI. This study extends existing literature showing that lifetime blast exposure, that is largely subconcussive, may negatively impact warfighter brain health and readiness beyond diagnosable brain injury.