The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition

PURPOSE

Achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on an outcomes instrument and reporting satisfaction with surgical outcomes are not equivalent. We hypothesized that improvement exceeding the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT MCID is associated with a greater likelihood of reporting satisfaction with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) treatment. Our secondary hypothesis was that a subset of patients failing to meet MCID would still be satisfied.

METHODS

Patients ≥1 year after LRTI at one academic tertiary institution were included. QuickDASH and UE CAT v1.2 scores were obtained before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction and levels of improvement in pain and function were also obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients completed the QuickDASH, and of those, 90 also completed the UE CAT. At a mean of 2.6 ± 1.0 years after surgery, QuickDASH and UE CAT score improvement exceeded the previously published MCID estimates of 8.8 and 4.8. Although 90% (84/93) of the patients reported satisfaction, only 85% (72/93) and 72% (59/90) achieved MCID on the QuickDASH and UE CAT, respectively. Using the MCID estimate of 8.8, 96% (72/75) of the patients meeting the MCID were satisfied with their treatment. Those failing to achieve MCID reported significantly less physical function and pain improvement; however, most were satisfied nonetheless (68% [13/19] for QuickDASH, 77% [23/30] for UE CAT).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving published MCID thresholds on the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 was predictive of patients reporting general satisfaction with their LRTI outcome ≥1 year after surgery. Most patients failing to achieve MCID still reported satisfaction with their LRTI. Achieving MCID thresholds alone should not be used as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with their treatment. Patient satisfaction is a complicated construct that is potentially very different from that of high-quality care.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Radiographic Thumb Metacarpal Subsidence Following Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition and Suture-Only Suspension Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Basal Joint Arthritis

BACKGROUND

The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a common source of osteoarthritis. Following trapeziectomy, ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) is considered a "gold standard" treatment, but suture-only suspension arthroplasty (SSA) has recently emerged as a simpler alternative. Currently, there is no objective radiographic study comparing subsidence following these 2 techniques.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of 23 patients (10 LRTI, 13 SSA) that had at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up following thumb CMC arthroplasty. Posteroanterior radiographs at a preoperative timepoint, and at the 2-week and greater than 6-month postoperative timepoints were evaluated for actual trapezial height, as well as trapezial height normalized to capitate, thumb metacarpal, and proximal phalangeal heights. Normalized trapezial heights were calculated, and preoperative values were compared with greater than 6-month postoperative values. In addition, actual and normalized trapezial heights following LRTI and SSA were compared at each timepoint.

RESULTS

Mean trapezial height decreased from approximately 12 to 5 mm (reduction of ~60%, P < .05) in both groups with no differences when comparing LRTI and SSA at each timepoint. All normalized trapezial heights revealed differences from preoperative to greater than 6-month postoperative timepoints, but no differences between LRTI and SSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition and SSA exhibit equivalent actual and normalized trapezial heights over a greater than 6-month postoperative time course.

Early Mobilization After Basal Joint Arthroplasty: Clinical Results

Background: Traditional rehabilitation for basal joint arthroplasty involves postoperative immobilization. We hypothesize that early motion is safe and will result in equivalent clinical outcomes to traditional rehabilitation. Methods: Patients undergoing ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition were randomized into 2 rehabilitation protocols. All patients were immobilized postoperatively in a thumb-spica splint for 2 weeks. The accelerated group (Group 1) was transitioned into a removable Carpometacarpal (CMC)-wrap with activity as tolerated, while the traditional group (Group 2) were immobilized for an additional 4 weeks. Patients were examined preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Outcome measures included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, a visual analog scale for pain (VAS), pinch and grip strength and thumb range of motion. Results: Ninety-three thumbs were randomized, 48 in group 1 and 45 in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups preoperatively. DASH scores were significantly lower in the accelerated rehabilitation group at 6 weeks postoperatively compared to the traditional rehabilitation group, but these became equivalent by 12 weeks postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to postoperative VAS, key, pinch, or grip strength or thumb range of motion at all time points postoperatively. Conclusions: Early (12-week and 1-year) outcomes suggest early mobilization of patients following CMC arthroplasty does not compromise clinical results. Long-term data will determine the lasting effects of accelerated rehabilitation but may offer earlier return to function than traditional rehabilitation.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the PROMIS Upper-Extremity Computer Adaptive Test and QuickDASH for Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition Patients

PURPOSE

To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test (UE CAT) and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) for ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) patients.

METHODS

Adult patients treated with LRTI for trapeziometacarpal OA by fellowship-trained hand surgeons between December 2014 and February 2018 at an academic tertiary institution were included. Outcomes were prospectively collected at each visit by tablet computer, including the QuickDASH, PROMIS UE, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety CATs. Inclusion required a response to the anchor question "How much relief and/or improvement do you feel you have experienced as a result of your treatment?" on a 6-option Likert scale, as well as preoperative (≤120 days before surgery) and follow-up (2-26 weeks) outcomes. We calculated MCID both by an anchor-based approach using the mean score of the minimal change group, and with the 0.5 SD method.

RESULTS

Of 145 included participants, mean age was 63 ± 8 years and 74% were female. Anchor-based MCID estimates for the total cohort were 4.2 for the PROMIS UE CAT and 8.8 for the QuickDASH. The MCID estimates using the 0.5 SD method were 4.8 and 11.7, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose MCID values of 4.2 to 4.8 for the PROMIS UE CAT and 8.8 to 11.7 for the QuickDASH when powering clinical studies or when assessing improvement among a cohort of patients who have undergone LRTI surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Minimal clinically important difference estimates are helpful when interpreting clinical outcomes after LRTI and for powering prospective trials.

Misvaluation of Hospital-Based Upper Extremity Surgery Across Payment, Relative Value Units, and Operative Time

BACKGROUND

Many US health care institutions have adopted compensation models based on work relative value units (wRVUs) to standardize payments and incentivize providers. Among other factors, a major determinant of payment and wRVU assignments is operative time. Our objective was to determine whether differences in estimated operative times between the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) contribute to payment and wRVU misvaluation for the most common hospital-based hand and upper extremity procedures.

METHODS

Data on wRVUs, surgeon payment, and estimated operative times were collected from CMS for 53 procedures. We used regression models to compare relationships between these variables, in addition to actual median operative times as reported in the NSQIP database, from 2011 to 2016. We then determined the relative valuation of each procedure based on operative time.

RESULTS

There was a wide discrepancy between CMS and NSQIP operative times (R²=0.49), with 60% of CMS times being longer than NSQIP times. Payment correlated more strongly with CMS operative times (R²=0.55) than with NSQIP operative times (R²=0.24). Similarly, wRVUs more strongly correlated with CMS operative times (R²=0.84) than with NSQIP operative times (R2=0.51). In general, for trauma-related procedures, any distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) had the highest valuation while any ORIF proximal to the distal radius had lower valuation in analysis of both databases. While 61% of trauma procedures were highly valued, 70% of elective procedures had a low valuation, including nearly all elective tendon procedures. Notable compensation differences were found between trapeziectomy versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, epicondyle debridement with tendon repair versus denervation, proximal row carpectomy versus four corner fusion, and distal radius open versus percutaneous fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

CMS may misvalue payment and wRVU rates of hospital-based hand procedures due to inaccurate operative time estimates. By identifying which procedures are misvalued in terms of payment and wRVU per operative time, providers and payors may be able to address these imbalances and maximize appropriate care delivery incentives.Level of Evidence: III.

Outcomes of Surgical Management for Thumb Basilar Arthritis in Patients 55 Years of Age and Younger

Background: Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) or suspensionplasty is an effective treatment in older patients with end-stage thumb basilar arthritis. However, the survivability of this procedure is unknown in younger patients who may impart more stress on their thumbs. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent trapeziectomy and LRTI or suspensionplasty at 55 years of age or younger from 1992 to 2008. Objective clinical outcome measures included preoperative to postoperative changes in thumb range of motion, grip and pinch strength, a study-specific thumb function score, and the Buck-Gramcko subjective outcome score. Progressive metacarpal subsidence was evaluated on radiographs. Survivorship free from revision surgery was calculated with a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 57 wrists underwent trapeziectomy and LRTI (n = 18) or suspensionplasty (n = 39). The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 49.6 years (range: 38-55 years). Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up were 10.2 and 6.4 years, respectively. Overall, there were significant improvements in pain and grip strength despite progressive and metacarpal subsidence. Survivorship was 100% and 86% free from revision surgery at 10 and 15 years, respectively (n = 2 failures). Conclusions: Trapeziectomy and LRTI or suspensionplasty in patients less than or equal to 55 years of age can result in considerable improvements in pain and grip strength with a 10-year survivorship free from revision.