1
|
Henson CE, Abou-Foul AK, Morton DJ, McDowell L, Baliga S, Bates J, Lee A, Bonomo P, Szturz P, Nankivell P, Huang SH, Lydiatt WM, O’Sullivan B, Mehanna H. Diagnostic challenges and prognostic implications of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: a state of the art review and gap analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1263347. [PMID: 37799466 PMCID: PMC10548228 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1263347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Extranodal extension (ENE) is a pattern of cancer growth from within the lymph node (LN) outward into perinodal tissues, critically defined by disruption and penetration of the tumor through the entire thickness of the LN capsule. The presence of ENE is often associated with an aggressive cancer phenotype in various malignancies including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In HNSCC, ENE is associated with increased risk of distant metastasis and lower rates of locoregional control. ENE detected on histopathology (pathologic ENE; pENE) is now incorporated as a risk-stratification factor in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM classification. Although ENE was first described almost a century ago, several issues remain unresolved, including lack of consensus on definitions, terminology, and widely accepted assessment criteria and grading systems for both pENE and ENE detected on radiological imaging (imaging-detected ENE; iENE). Moreover, there is conflicting data on the prognostic significance of iENE and pENE, particularly in the context of HPV-associated HNSCC. Herein, we review the existing literature on ENE in HNSCC, highlighting areas of controversy and identifying critical gaps requiring concerted research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina E. Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Ahmad K. Abou-Foul
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel J. Morton
- Department of Pediatrics and Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Lachlan McDowell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - James Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Petr Szturz
- Department of Oncology, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul Nankivell
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William M. Lydiatt
- Department of Surgery, Creighton University, and Nebraska Methodist Health System, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Brian O’Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hisham Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han J, Zakeri K, Raab G, Hesse J, Shamseddine A, Chen L, Yu Y, Kang JJ, McBride SM, Riaz N, Jillian Tsai C, Gelblum D, Sherman EJ, Wong RJ, Michel L, Lee NY. Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2023; 45:2207-2216. [PMID: 37439286 PMCID: PMC10981461 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the outcomes of cisplatin-ineligible HNSCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiation and concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included consecutive HNSCC patients treated from 2013 to 2021 that received definitive chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Locoregional recurrences (LRR) and distant metastases (DM) were estimated using cumulative incidence functions. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were identified with median age of 71 years (range 44-85). Median radiation dose was 70 Gy and the median doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel were AUC 1 and 40 mg/m2 , respectively. At a median follow-up of 29 (range 5-91) months, the 2-year rates of LRR, DM, PFS, and OS were 8.8%, 9.4%, 72.2%, and 88.7%, respectively. In total, there were 5 LRR, 7 DM, and 12 deaths. CONCLUSIONS Chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel is an excellent option for cisplatin-ineligible HNSCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gabriel Raab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Hesse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Achraf Shamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pimvichai S, Matchim Y, Sinthusake T, Wongkalasin K. Quality of life and its correlates in pretreatment patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional study in Thailand. Belitung Nurs J 2023; 9:244-252. [PMID: 37492758 PMCID: PMC10363966 DOI: 10.33546/bnj.2621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) can significantly impact the quality of life of patients in various ways. However, several factors can contribute to the decrease in quality of life. In Thailand, there is limited knowledge about the factors that affect the quality of life of patients with LAHNC before they receive treatment. Objective This study aimed to examine the correlations between Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), family income, body mass index (BMI), age, comorbidity index, and the quality of life of patients with LAHNC before they undergo treatment. Methods A correlational cross-sectional study was conducted, and data were collected from 94 pretreatment patients with LAHNC who were admitted to a cancer center in central Thailand using purposive sampling. The data collection instruments included a demographic data form, a medical record form, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) version 4. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and Spearman's rank correlation were used to analyze the data. Results All study participants completed the questionnaire. The results showed that the overall quality of life of the patients was moderate. PPS, family income, and body mass index were moderately positively correlated with quality of life (r = 0.494, p <0.01; r = 0.420, p <0.01; r = 0.339, p <0.01, respectively). Age had a moderate negative correlation with quality of life (r = -0.596, p <0.01), while comorbidity was not significantly associated with quality of life. Conclusion The quality of life of patients with LAHNC before treatment was associated with various factors, including PPS, family income, body mass index, and age. These findings highlight the importance of nutritional support before treatment and the need for social support, especially for older adult patients, to improve their quality of life. The results of this study can be valuable for nurses in developing care programs that enhance the quality of life for patients with LAHNC during the pretreatment phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yaowarat Matchim
- Faculty of Nursing, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Tanadej Sinthusake
- Maha Vajiralongkorn Thanyaburi Hospital, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiang W, Li R, Zhang L, Dou S, Ye L, Shao Z, Wu S, Dong M, Li J, Zhu G. Efficacy and feasibility of Apatinib and S-1 as a novel oral induction therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an exploratory phase 2 open-label, single-arm trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1072538. [PMID: 37251944 PMCID: PMC10213222 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1072538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The current standard nonsurgical treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LA-HNSCC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with CRT has been explored in HNSCC patients and is an acceptable strategy. However, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) restricts its application. We conducted a clinical study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of a novel induction therapy with orally administered apatinib and S-1 in LA-HNSCC. Materials and methods This nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective clinical trial included patients with LA-HNSCCs. The eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC, with at least one radiographically measurable lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scan, age 18-75 years, and a diagnosis of stage III to IVb according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC). Patients received induction therapy with apatinib and S-1 for three cycles (3 weeks/cycle). The primary endpoint of this study was the objective response rate (ORR) to induction therapy. The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs during induction treatment. Results From October 2017 to September 2020, 49 patients with LA-HNSCC were screened consecutively and 38 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range, 39-75). Thirty-three patients (86.8%) had stage IV disease according to the AJCC staging system. The ORR after induction therapy was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.2%-99.9%). the 3-year OS rate was 64.2% (95% CI: 46.0%-78.2%) and 3-year PFS was 57.1% (95% CI: 40.8%-73.6%). The most common AEs during induction therapy were hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, which were manageable. Conclusion Apatinib combined with S-1 as novel induction therapy for LA-HNSCC patients resulted in a higher-than-anticipated ORR and manageable adverse effects. With the associated safety profile and preferable oral administration route, apatinib combined with S-1 is an attractive exploratory induction regimen in outpatient settings. However, this regimen failed to show a survival benefit. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03267121, identifier NCT03267121.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Jiang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Rongrong Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengjin Dou
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Lulu Ye
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziyang Shao
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Sicheng Wu
- Biostatistics Office of Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Minjun Dong
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiang Li
- Department of Oral Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guopei Zhu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Center of Head and Neck Oncology Clinical and Translational Science, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma R, Vats S, Seam R, Gupta M, Negi RR, Fotedar V, Singh K. A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation. Cureus 2023; 15:e38362. [PMID: 37266055 PMCID: PMC10230179 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the objective and patient-reported toxicities of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIAL In this prospective study, 46 patients with histologically proven stage III-IVA head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive either concurrent chemoradiation to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV weekly; control arm) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost radiotherapy (study arm) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions in five weeks. Acute toxicity was evaluated using RTOG toxicity criteria. The assessment was done weekly after initiation of treatment, at the first follow-up (six weeks), and at three months. The four main patient-reported symptoms of pain, hoarseness of voice, dryness of mouth, and loss of taste were also compared between the two groups to assess patient quality of life during treatment. RESULTS The mean treatment duration was 37 days in the CBRT arm and 49 days in the CRT arm. Treatment-related interruptions were less in the study group,17.3% in the study, and 27.2% in the control with insignificant P-value. Grade III laryngeal toxicity was significantly higher in the study group (P=0.029). Other acute grade I-III toxicities (pharyngeal, skin, mucositis, and salivary) were comparable in both CRT and CBRT arms. Grade IV toxicities were seen only in the CBRT arm but were resolved at the first follow-up. Haematological toxicities and renal toxicities were significantly higher in the CRT arm, with significant P-values of 0.0004 and 0.018, respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, concomitant boost radiotherapy is well tolerated with acceptable local toxicity and minimal systemic toxicity as compared to conventional chemoradiation. It is a feasible option for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer not fit for concurrent chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Sharma
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, IND
| | - Siddharth Vats
- Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, IND
| | - Rajeev Seam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institiute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, IND
| | - Manish Gupta
- Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, IND
| | - Ratti R Negi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, IND
| | - Vikas Fotedar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, IND
| | - Kaalindi Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mall A, Negi P, Philip AO, Kingsley PA. Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer - Boon or bane? J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:420-425. [PMID: 37006076 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_839_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer, induction chemotherapy is considered an alternative approach by head and neck oncologists worldwide. Aims To evaluate the response to induction chemotherapy in terms of loco-regional control and treatment-related toxicity in inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. Materials and Methods This prospective study was conducted on patients who received two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Following this, response assessment was performed clinically. Grading of radiation-induced oral mucositis and any interruptions in treatment were noted. At 8 weeks following treatment, magnetic resonance imaging-based radiological response assessment was performed using RECIST criteria version 1.1. Results Our data revealed 57.7% complete response rate with induction chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation therapy. We observed that post induction, 67.5% and 47.5% patients had reduction in T-stage (<0.001) and N-stage of disease (<0.001), respectively, with complete response more achieved in younger patients (≤50 years). Chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.5% patients. We demonstrated that a higher grade of radiation-induced mucositis was noticed among those receiving three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and aged >50 years. Conclusion We conclude that induction chemotherapy could still be a viable option for down-staging unresectable locally advanced disease, especially for younger patients in terms of better treatment response and tolerability. The number of cycles of ICT seems to influence radiation-induced mucositis. This study underscores the need for further studies to determine the exact role of ICT in locally advanced head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aprajita Mall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Preety Negi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Ashwin Oommen Philip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Pamela A Kingsley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Assessment of the Role of Gefitinib With Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Cureus 2022; 14:e32532. [PMID: 36654538 PMCID: PMC9840434 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinoma has been a combination of chemotherapy and radiation. The higher incidences of recurrence and metastasis warrant the search for an alternative therapy for better patient outcomes. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of gefitinib in conjunction with concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced stages III and IV head and neck cancer. METHODOLOGY The patients were equally divided into two groups: Group I received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on the first, 22nd, and 43rd days together with the radiation, whereas Group II was given the same treatment as Group I together with oral doses of gefitinib 250 mg on a daily basis, starting two weeks prior to radiotherapy and continuing until the completion of it. The dose of radiotherapy was 2 Gray (Gy) per fraction given over a period of five days per week to a maximum of 70 Gy in locally higher grades of head and neck neoplasms. The evaluation was performed in accordance with the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, which include stable disease (SD), progressing disease (PD), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR). Salvage chemotherapy, potential surgical intervention, or palliative care was presented to patients with remaining or recurring diseases. The grading of the patients for acute and chronic radiation morbidity was done according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria for toxicity during radiation treatment and at each subsequent follow-up. Parameters such as site, nodal involvement, stage, tumor status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) were recorded. RESULTS On comparing the patient characteristics, no statistical significance was observed. The overall response was seen in 24 (80%) and 28 (83.33%) patients in Group I and Group II, respectively (p = 0.08). All patients in Group I and Group II reported xerostomia as an acute/chronic adverse event of chemotherapy. Similarly, mucositis, dysphagia, and diarrhea were observed in all the patients, and no statistical difference was observed. Seventeen (56.67%) patients in Group II had complaints of skin rashes, while four (13.33%) patients in Group I had similar complaints (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION The study concludes that encouraging results were observed in comparing overall response after the addition of oral gefitinib to the traditional treatment of locally advanced head and neck neoplasms.
Collapse
|
8
|
Alamgeer M, Coleman A, McDowell L, Giddings C, Safdar A, Sigston E, Wang Y, Subramaniam A. Treatment outcomes of standard (high dose) cisplatin and non-standard chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 6:e1674. [PMID: 35792145 PMCID: PMC9875652 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose (HD) cisplatin is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Due to the higher treatment-related adverse effects with standard therapy, alternative regimens (non-standard therapy), namely, lower dose weekly cisplatin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, or cetuximab are considered. There is, however, no consensus on non-standard regimens. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of these regimens. METHODS This single centre retrospective cohort study included all consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC treated with either standard or non-standard regimens between January 2016 and April 2021. The primary outcome was 2-year failure-free survival (FFS). The secondary outcomes included acute toxicities, hospitalisation rates, dose modifications, treatment failure rates (TFR), and overall survival. RESULTS About 235 patients were included in the final analysis; median age was 61 years (IQR 55-67), and 87% were male. Most had oropharyngeal tumours (85.5%) and p16-positivity was frequent (80%). About 56% received non-standard regimens: weekly cisplatin = 79 and non-cisplatin = 48. These patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; p < .001) and lower European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-0 (p = .003). There was no difference in 2-year FFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16; 95% confidence interval - [CI] 0.65-2.05), hospitalisation and grade-3 toxicity rates between the two regimens. Nausea and vomiting were lower in the non-standard regimen (3.0% vs. 16%, p < .001). Dose reductions, adjusted for age, sex, and CCI, were less likely in the non-standard regimen (OR = 2.36; 95%-CI: 1.01-5.49, p = .007). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated similar efficacy of lower dose weekly cisplatin and carboplatin/paclitaxel regimens and better safety profile of weekly cisplatin compared to standard HD cisplatin regimens for LA-HNSCC. Multicenter randomised control trials are required in HD cisplatin-ineligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Alamgeer
- Department of Medical OncologyMonash HealthClaytonVictoriaAustralia,Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Andrew Coleman
- Department of Radiation OncologyPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Lachlan McDowell
- Department of Radiation OncologyPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Charles Giddings
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryMonash HealthClaytonVictoriaAustralia,Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Adnan Safdar
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryMonash HealthClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Sigston
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryMonash HealthClaytonVictoriaAustralia,Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Medical OncologyMonash HealthClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Ashwin Subramaniam
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia,Department of Intensive Care MedicinePeninsula HealthFrankstonVictoriaAustralia,Peninsula Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia,Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC‐RC), School of Public Health and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Willemsen ACH, Degens JHRJ, Baijens LWJ, Dingemans AMC, Hoeben A, Hoebers FJP, De Ruysscher DKM, Schols AMWJ. Early Loss of Fat Mass During Chemoradiotherapy Predicts Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung, but Not in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Front Nutr 2020; 7:600612. [PMID: 33324671 PMCID: PMC7726186 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.600612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cancer cachexia is highly prevalent in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC), and compromises treatment tolerance and overall survival (OS). NSCLC and LAHNSCC patients share similar risk factors, and receive comparable anti-cancer treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and handgrip strength (HGS) (baseline and early changes during therapy) on OS in NSCLC and LAHNSCC patients treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (BRT). To elucidate potential underlying determinants of early changes in body composition and HGS, specific (fat and fat free) mass loss patterns of squamous NSCLC (sNSCLC) were compared to human papilloma virus negative (HPV–) LAHNSCC patients treated with CRT. Methods: Between 2013 and 2016, BIA and HGS were performed at baseline and after 3 weeks of CRT/BRT in LAHNSCC and NSCLC patients treated with curative intent. Results: Two hundred thirty-three patients were included for baseline measurements. Fat free mass index (FFMI) and HGS<10th percentile of reference values at baseline were both prognostic for poor OS in NSCLC and LAHNSCC [HR 1.64 [95%CI 1.13–2.39], p = 0.01 and HR 2.30 [95%CI 1.33–3.97], p = 0.003, respectively], independent of Charlson Comorbidity Index, cancer site, and gross tumor volume. Early fat mass (FM) loss during CRT was predictive for poor OS in sNSCLC (n = 64) [HR 3.80 [95%CI 1.79–8.06] p ≤ 0.001] but not in HPV– LAHNSCC (n = 61). In patients with significant weight loss (>2%) in the first 3 weeks of CRT (sNSCLC n = 24, HPV– LAHNSCC n = 23), the FM change was −1.4 ± 14.5% and −8.7 ± 9.0% in sNSCLC and HPV– LAHNSCC patients, respectively (p < 0.05). Fat fee mass change was −5.6 ± 6.3% and −4.0 ± 4.3% for sNSCLC and HPV– LAHNSCC, respectively (p = 0.31). Conclusion: FFMI and HGS<10th percentile at baseline are independent prognostic factors for poor OS in NSCLC and LAHNSCC patients treated with CRT/BRT. The specific composition of mass loss during first 3 weeks of CRT significantly differs between sNSCLC and HPV– LAHNSCC patients. Early FM loss was prognostic in sNSCLC only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C H Willemsen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - J H R J Degens
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - L W J Baijens
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - A-M C Dingemans
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - A Hoeben
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - F J P Hoebers
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - D K M De Ruysscher
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - A M W J Schols
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tousif D, Sarathy V, Kumar R, Naik R. Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Efficacy and Toxicity of Weekly vs. 3-Weekly Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1284. [PMID: 32850394 PMCID: PMC7424062 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Head and Neck Cancer is a major public health problem in India, majority of which are lifestyle related, male predominant requiring dedicated infrastructure and human resource. The 5-year survival is 59% for all stages combined and only 45% in patients with locally advanced inoperable head and neck cancer using current chemoradiation schedules. Chemotherapy agents administered in the induction or concurrent setting comprise of taxanes (Docetaxel, paclitaxel), platinum compounds (Cisplatin, carboplatin) and fluorouracil (TPF). For patients with advanced Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), 3-weekly TPF regimen is the established standard induction chemotherapy (ICT) option based on overall survival benefit. However, TPF regimen is known to be associated with significant dose limiting toxicities which may impair tolerance and effectiveness of therapy. In this study we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of weekly vs. 3-weekly Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluoro-uracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy in locally advanced Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Methods: This was an open labeled randomized two arm study with 41 patients in the 3-weekly TPF arm and 41 patients in the weekly arm. Patients were randomized using numbers from a randomization software, data recorded, and results were analyzed. Results: The weekly group achieved far greater symptom relief than 3-weekly group (72 vs. 64%). The overall response rates were similar in both arms (ORR 75.6 and 73.1% in the weekly and 3-weekly groups, respectively). Renal toxicity was significantly lower in the weekly group as compared to 3 weekly arm post three cycles of chemotherapy (CrCl 91.49 ml/min vs. 76.67 ml/min, respectively). The weekly group had predominantly grade I and II neutropenia (19.5 and 17.1%, respectively) as compared to 3-weekly group where grade III and IV neutropenia (31 and 12%, respectively) was more prominent (p-0.003). Among non-hematological toxicities, mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea in the weekly group were significantly lower when compared to 3-weekly group. Progression free survival was slightly higher in the weekly group (18 months) when compared to 3-weekly group (15 months) which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Weekly induction with TPF had lower toxicity and similar efficacy as compared to 3-weekly regimen in locally advanced HNSCC patients. Myelosuppression, which was the most serious and common complication of 3-weekly TPF regimens was notably low using the weekly regimen. Our results suggest that weekly TPF regimen may be a safer and effective alternative to 3-weekly TPF for treatment of LA-HNSCC. To our knowledge this is the first study reporting the efficacy of weekly TPF regimen in LA-HNSCC till date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devale Tousif
- HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd (HCG), Bangalore, India
| | - Vinu Sarathy
- HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd (HCG), Bangalore, India.,HCG Cancer Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Rajesh Kumar
- HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd (HCG), Bangalore, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Majumder D, Choudhury K, Das P, Kundu S, Mitra D. Different fractionation schedules of radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck malignancy: A prospective randomized study to compare the results of treatment and toxicities of different protocols. South Asian J Cancer 2014; 2:31-5. [PMID: 24455542 PMCID: PMC3876621 DOI: 10.4103/2278-330x.105890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Altered fractionated radiotherapy may have better result than conventional radiotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy to treat locally advanced head and neck cancers. Aims: Evaluation of the response and toxicities in different fractionated radiotherapy schedules in locally advanced head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: Sixty four histologically proved patients of locally advanced head and neck cancer were included in the study according to protocol and were randomized into three arms. Arm A (n = 21) received 66 Gy in 33 fractions (5 fractions/week from Monday to Friday) single fraction daily in 6½ weeks along with concomitant chemotherapy (injection Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 intravenous once weekly) for 6 weeks. Arm B (n = 21) received 66 Gy in 33 fractions (6 fractions per week) single fraction daily in 5½ weeks, and arm C (n = 22) received late hyperfractionation after 3 weeks; 30 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks followed by 1.4 Gy twice daily (time gap between 2 fractions were 6 hours) for 15 days with a total of 72 Gy in 6 weeks. Response to treatment, compliance, and toxicities were compared in all the three arms. Statistical Analysis Used: Frequency table and chi square tests done. Results: Baseline data were comparable in all the three arms. Complete response in arm A, arm B, and arm C were 15%, 26.315%, and 23.81%, respectively (P = 0.339). Grade 1 Neutropenia in arm A was 15%, arm B was 26.32%, and arm C was nil (P = 0.0486). Conclusion: Altered fractionation and concurrent chemoradiation showed similar response with comparable acute toxicities except nutropenia, which was significantly higher in arm B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipanjan Majumder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Kakali Choudhury
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Pabitra Das
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Suvrokanti Kundu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Debabrata Mitra
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cahlon O, Shaha A, Lee N. A unique complication associated with concurrent chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. Clin Med Oncol 2008; 2:313-8. [PMID: 21892292 PMCID: PMC3161639 DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiation is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. The full extent of treatment related complications has not been completely documented in the literature. METHODS We present the case of a patient treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy and concurrent carboplatin and fluorouracil for a locally advanced oral cavity and base of tongue cancer. RESULTS The patient suffered acute grade 4 dermatitis and mucositis during treatment. One month after completion of treatment, the patient was found to have permanent adherence of the tongue to the buccal mucosa as a result of severe scar tissue formation. CONCLUSIONS As more patients undergo chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer, the full extent of treatment related complications are being identified. To our knowledge, this is the first report of chemoradiation for head and neck cancer resulting in adherence of the tongue to the buccal mucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|