Significance of RNA N6-methyladenosine regulators in the diagnosis and subtype classification of coronary heart disease using the Gene Expression Omnibus database

Background

Many investigations have revealed that alterations in m6A modification levels may be linked to coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the specific link between m6A alteration and CHD warrants further investigation.

Methods

Gene expression profiles from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. We began by constructing a Random Forest model followed by a Nomogram model, both aimed at enhancing our predictive capabilities on specific m6A markers. We then shifted our focus to identify distinct molecular subtypes based on the key m6A regulators and to discern differentially expressed genes between the unique m6A clusters. Following this molecular exploration, we embarked on an in-depth analysis of the biological characteristics associated with each m6A cluster, revealing profound differences between them. Finally, we delved into the identification and correlation analysis of immune cell infiltration across these clusters, emphasizing the potential interplay between m6A modification and the immune system.

Results

In this research, 37 important m6Aregulators were identified by comparing non-CHD and CHD patients from the GSE20680, GSE20681, and GSE71226 datasets. To predict the risk of CHD, seven candidate m6A regulators (CBLL1, HNRNPC, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, ZC3H13) were screened using the logistic regression model. Based on the seven possible m6A regulators, a nomogram model was constructed. An examination of decision curves revealed that CHD patients could benefit from the nomogram model. On the basis of the selected relevant m6A regulators, patients with CHD were separated into two m6A clusters (cluster1 and cluster2) using the consensus clustering approach. The Single Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and CIBERSORT methods were used to estimate the immunological characteristics of two separate m6A Gene Clusters; the results indicated a close association between seven candidate genes and immune cell composition. The drug sensitivity of seven candidate regulators was predicted, and these seven regulators appeared in numerous diseases as pharmacological targets while displaying strong drug sensitivity.

Conclusion

m6A regulators play crucial roles in the development of CHD. Our research of m6A clusters may facilitate the development of novel molecular therapies and inform future immunotherapeutic methods for CHD.

The functions and prognostic values of m6A RNA methylation regulators in thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND

N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) is the most common RNA modification and regulates RNA splicing, translation, translocation, and stability. Aberrant expression of m6A has been reported in various types of human cancers. m6A RNA modification is dynamically and reversibly mediated by different regulators, including methyltransferase, demethylases, and m6A binding proteins. However, the role of m6A RNA methylation regulators in thyroid cancer remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the 13 main m6A RNA modification regulators in thyroid carcinoma.

METHODS

We obtained clinical data and RNA sequencing data of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) THCA database. We performed consensus clustering to identify the clinical relevance of m6A RNA methylation regulators in thyroid carcinoma. Then we used LASSO Cox regression analysis to generate a prognostic signature based on m6A RNA modification regulator expression. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Gene Ontology and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed to explore differential cellular processes and signaling pathways between the two groups based on risk signature.

RESULTS

We found that most of the m6A RNA modification regulators are down-regulated in 450 patients with thyroid carcinoma. We derived a three m6A RNA modification regulator genes-based risk signature (FTO, RBM15 and KIAA1429), that is an independent prognostic biomarker in patients with thyroid carcinoma. Moreover, we found that this risk signature could better predict outcome in male than female. Functional research in vitro demonstrated that the m6A RNA methylation regulators involved in the model acted significant role in the proliferation and migration of thyroid cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed the influence of m6A RNA methylation regulators on thyroid carcinoma through biological experiments and three-gene prognostic model.

The m6A methylation regulator-based signature for predicting the prognosis of prostate cancer

Aim: To construct a survival prediction signature for prostate cancer (PC) based on the RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation regulator. Materials & methods: This paper explores the interaction network of differentially expressed m6A RNA methylation regulators in PC by Pearson correlation analysis. Univariate Cox risk regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct a predictive signature of PC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared the overall survival of the high- and low-risk groups. Results & Conclusion: We first constructed a prognostic two gene signature for PC based on the m6A RNA methylation regulators MRTTL14 and YTHDF2. The interaction network of m6A RNA methylation regulators in PC was also established.