1
|
Ribeiro M, Barbosa C, Correia P, Torrão L, Neves Cardoso P, Moreira R, Falcão-Reis F, Falcão M, Pinheiro-Costa J. Best Fit Sphere Back and Adjusted Maximum Elevation of Corneal Back Surface as Novel Predictors of Keratoconus Progression. Clin Ophthalmol 2022; 16:4239-4248. [PMID: 36573232 PMCID: PMC9789719 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s388614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the Maximum Elevation of Corneal Back Surface adjusted to the same Best Fit Sphere Back (BFSB) between timeline measurements (AdjEleBmax) and the BFSB radius (BFSBR) itself as new tomographic parameters for documentation of ectasia progression and compare them with the most recent and reliable parameters used on keratoconus (KC) progression. Results We evaluated the performance and the ideal cutoff point of Kmax, D-index, posterior radius of curvature from the 3.0 mm centered on the thinnest point (PRC), EleBmax, BFSBR, and AdjEleBmax as isolated parameters to document KC progression (defined as a significant change in two or more variables), we found a sensitivity of 70%, 82%, 79%, 65%, 51%, and 63% and a specificity of 91%, 98%, 80%, 73%, 80%, and 84% to detect KC progression. The area under the curve (AUC) for each variable was 0.822, 0.927, 0.844, 0.690, 0.695, 0.754, respectively. Conclusion AdjEleBmax presented a greater specificity, larger AUC, and better performance compared to EleBmax without any adjustment, with similar sensitivity. Although AdjEleBmax and BFSB demonstrated smaller AUC and specificities comparing with Kmax and D-Index, AdjEleBmax still presented a good performance with a reasonable AUC. Since the shape of the posterior surface, more aspheric and curved than the anterior, may facilitate detection of change, we suggest the inclusion of AdjEleBmax in the evaluation of KC progression in conjunction with other variables to increase the reliability of our clinical evaluation and early detection of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarida Ribeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal,Department of Biomedicine – Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal,Correspondence: Margarida Ribeiro, Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro Porto, 4200-319, Portugal, Email
| | | | - Paulo Correia
- Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Torrão
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Neves Cardoso
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Raúl Moreira
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fernando Falcão-Reis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal,Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuel Falcão
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal,Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Pinheiro-Costa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal,Department of Biomedicine – Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|