A comparison of criteria for defining metabolic acidemia in live-born neonates and its effect on predicting serious adverse neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Metabolic acidemia is a known risk factor for serious adverse neonatal outcomes in both preterm and term infants.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of delivery umbilical cord gas measurements with regard to serious adverse neonatal outcomes, and to determine if distinct thresholds for defining metabolic acidemia differ in their ability to predict such adverse neonatal complications.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton live-born deliveries between January 2011 and December 2019. Stratification according to gestational age at birth (≥35 and <35 weeks of gestation) was performed, and comparisons of maternal characteristics, obstetrical complications, intrapartum events, and adverse neonatal outcomes were made between neonates with metabolic acidemia and those without. Metabolic acidemia (based on delivery umbilical cord gas analyses) was defined using both American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria. The primary outcome of interest was hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia.

RESULTS

A total of 91,694 neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation met the inclusion criteria. By American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria, 2659 (2.9%) infants had metabolic acidemia. Neonates with metabolic acidemia were at markedly increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission, seizures, need for respiratory support, sepsis, and neonatal death. Metabolic acidemia by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria was associated with an almost 100-fold increased risk of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia (relative risk, 92.69; 95% confidence interval, 64.42-133.35) in neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation. Diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, postterm deliveries, prolonged second stages, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal deliveries, placental abruption and cesarean deliveries were associated with metabolic acidemia in neonates born ≥ 35 weeks of gestation. The highest relative risk was in those diagnosed with placental abruption (relative risk, 9.07; 95% confidence interval, 7.25-11.36). The neonatal cohort born <35 weeks of gestation had similar findings. When comparing those infants born ≥ 35 weeks of gestation with metabolic acidemia by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria vs Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria identified more neonates at risk for serious adverse neonatal outcomes. In particular, 4.9% more neonates were diagnosed with metabolic acidemia, and 16 more term neonates were identified as requiring whole-body hypothermia. Mean 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores were similar and reassuring among neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation with and without metabolic acidemia as defined by both American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria (8 vs 8 and 9 vs 9, respectively; P<.001). Sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 92.2%, respectively, with the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria, and 74.2% and 97.2% with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria.

CONCLUSION

Infants with metabolic acidemia identified on cord gas collection at delivery are at considerably greater risk of serious adverse neonatal outcomes, including an almost 100-fold increased risk of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia. Use of the more sensitive Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria for defining metabolic acidemia identifies more neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation at risk for adverse neonatal outcomes, including hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia.

The association of fetal acidemia with adverse neonatal outcomes at time of scheduled cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery is generally unexpected. In the setting of reassuring preoperative monitoring, the duration of fetal acidemia in this scenario is presumably brief. The neonatal sequelae and risks associated with brief fetal acidemia in this setting are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess whether fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled prelabor cesarean delivery is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, term, nonanomalous, liveborn neonates delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery that was performed under regional anesthesia from 2004 to 2014 at a single tertiary care center with a universal umbilical cord gas policy. Neonates born to laboring gravidas and those whose cesarean delivery was performed for nonreassuring fetal status were excluded. All included patients had reassuring preoperative fetal monitoring. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome that included neonatal death, encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia, seizures, intubation, and respiratory distress. This outcome was compared between patients with and those without fetal acidemia (umbilical artery pH <7.2). A multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Cases of fetal acidemia were further characterized as respiratory, metabolic, or mixed acidemia based on additional umbilical cord gas values. Secondary analyses examining the association between the type of acidemia and neonatal outcomes were also performed.

RESULTS

Of 2081 neonates delivered via scheduled cesarean delivery, 252 (12.1%) had fetal acidemia at the time of delivery. Acidemia was more common in breech neonates and in neonates born to gravidas with obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus. Compared with fetuses with normal umbilical artery pH, those with fetal acidemia were at a significantly increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome (adjusted relative risk, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-4.12). This increased risk was similar regardless of the type of acidemia.

CONCLUSION

Even a brief period of mild acidemia is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery despite reassuring preoperative monitoring. Addressing modifiable intraoperative factors that may contribute to fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery, such as maternal hypotension and prolonged operative time, is an important priority to potentially decrease neonatal morbidity in full-term gestations.

The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia

BACKGROUND

Despite intensive efforts directed at initial training in fetal heart rate interpretation, continuing medical education, board certification/recertification, team training, and the development of specific protocols for the management of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, the goals of consistently preventing hypoxia-induced fetal metabolic acidemia and neurologic injury remain elusive.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to validate a recently published algorithm for the management of category II fetal heart rate tracings, to examine reasons for the birth of infants with significant metabolic acidemia despite the use of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, and to examine critically the limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.

STUDY DESIGN

The potential performance of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring under ideal circumstances was evaluated in an outcomes-blinded examination fetal heart rate tracing of infants with metabolic acidemia at birth (base deficit, >12) and matched control infants (base deficit, <8) under the following conditions: (1) expert primary interpretation, (2) use of a published algorithm that was developed and endorsed by a large group of national experts, (3) assumption of a 30-minute period of evaluation for noncritical category II fetal heart rate tracings, followed by delivery within 30 minutes, (4) evaluation without the need to provide patient care simultaneously, and (5) comparison of results under these circumstances with those achieved in actual clinical practice.

RESULTS

During the study period, 120 infants were identified with an arterial cord blood base deficit of >12 mM/L. Matched control infants were not demographically different from subjects. In actual practice, operative intervention on the basis of an abnormal fetal heart rate tracings occurred in 36 of 120 fetuses (30.0%) with metabolic acidemia. Based on expert, algorithm-assisted reviews, 55 of 120 patients with acidemia (45.8%) were judged to need operative intervention for abnormal fetal heart rate tracings. This difference was significant (P=.016). In infants who were born with a base deficit of >12 mM/L in which blinded, algorithm-assisted expert review indicated the need for operative delivery, the decision for delivery would have been made an average of 131 minutes before the actual delivery. The rate of expert intervention for fetal heart rate concerns in the nonacidemic control group (22/120; 18.3%) was similar to the actual intervention rate (23/120; 19.2%; P=1.0) Expert review did not mandate earlier delivery in 65 of 120 patients with metabolic acidemia. The primary features of these 65 cases included the occurrence of sentinel events with prolonged deceleration just before delivery, the rapid deterioration of nonemergent category II fetal heart rate tracings before realistic time frames for recognition and intervention, and the failure of recognized fetal heart rate patterns such as variability to identify metabolic acidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert, algorithm-assisted fetal heart rate interpretation has the potential to improve standard clinical performance by facilitating significantly earlier recognition of some tracings that are associated with metabolic acidemia without increasing the rate of operative intervention. However, this improvement is modest. Of infants who are born with metabolic acidemia, only approximately one-half potentially could be identified and have delivery expedited even under ideal circumstances, which are probably not realistic in current US practice. This represents the limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring performance. Additional technologies will be necessary if the goal of the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia is to be realized.