Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) are popular mid and low rectal cancer trends. However, there is currently no systematic comparison between LaTME and TaTME of mid and low rectal cancer. Therefore, we systematically study the perioperative and pathological outcomes of LaTME and TaTME in mid and low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Articles included searching through the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Web of science for articles on LaTME and TaTME. We calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol for this review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022380067).

RESULTS

There are 8761 participants included in 33 articles. Compared with TaTME, patients who underwent LaTME had no statistical difference in operation time (OP), estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hospital stay, over complications, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, anastomotic stenosis, wound infection, circumferential resection margin, distal resection margin, major low anterior resection syndrom, lymph node yield, loop ileostomy, and diverting ileostomy. There are similarities between LaTME and TaTME for 2-year DFS rate, 2-year OS rate, distant metastasis rat, and local recurrence rate. However, patients who underwent LaTME had less anastomotic leak rates (RR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70-0.97; I2 = 10.6%, P = .019) but TaTME had less end colostomy (RR 1.96; 95% CI: 1.19-3.23; I2 = 0%, P = .008).

CONCLUSION

This study comprehensively and systematically evaluated the differences in safety and effectiveness between LaTME and TaTME in the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer through meta-analysis. Patients who underwent LaTME had less anastomotic leak rate but TaTME had less end colostomy. There is no difference in other aspects. Of course, in the future, more scientific and rigorous conclusions need to be drawn from multi-center RCT research.

Applications of computed tomography pelvimetry and clinical-pathological parameters in sphincter preservation of mid-low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of pelvic anatomical and clinical-pathological parameters that influence the success of sphincter preservation procedure (SPP).

METHODS

We studied 42 consecutive patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) with double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for mid-low rectal cancer between June 2009 and April 2014. The surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon and surgical team at the Department of Surgery of Wenzhou Central Hospital. Pelvic dimensions and angles were measured using three-dimensional reconstruction of spiral computed tomography (CT) images. A number of clinical-pathological parameters were also examined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive significance of these variables that might affect a successful SPP for mid-low rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Body mass index (BMI), distance of tumor from anal verge, and diameter of upper pubis to coccyx affected the success of SPP. It was the higher distance of tumor from anal verge, the higher BMI, and the larger diameter of upper pubis to coccyx contributed most to the success of SPP.

CONCLUSIONS

Diameter of upper pubis to coccyx is the only one of the pelvic anatomical parameters that could affect the success of SPP for mid-low rectal cancer patients. Furthermore, within the normal BMI range, higher BMI seemed to be a favorable factor for the success of SPP.