False Liver Metastasis by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scan after Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer-Potential Overstaged Pitfalls of Treatment

In patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), subsequent restaging with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can reveal the presence of interval metastases, such as liver metastases, in approximately 10% of cases. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon in clinical practice to observe focal FDG uptake in the liver that is not associated with liver metastases but rather with radiation-induced liver injury (RILI), which can result in the overstaging of the disease. Liver radiation damage is also a concern during distal esophageal cancer radiotherapy due to its proximity to the left liver lobe, typically included in the radiation field. Post-CRT, if FDG activity appears in the left or caudate liver lobes, a thorough investigation is needed to confirm or rule out distant metastases. The increased FDG uptake in liver lobes post-CRT often presents a diagnostic dilemma. Distinguishing between radiation-induced liver disease and metastasis is vital for appropriate patient management, necessitating a combination of imaging techniques and an understanding of the factors influencing the radiation response. Diagnosis involves identifying new foci of hepatic FDG avidity on PET/CT scans. Geographic regions of hypoattenuation on CT and well-demarcated regions with specific enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced CT scans and MRI are characteristic of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). Lack of mass effect on all three modalities (CT, MRI, PET) indicates RILD. Resolution of abnormalities on subsequent examinations also helps in diagnosing RILD. Moreover, it can also help to rule out occult metastases, thereby excluding those patients from further surgery who will not benefit from esophagectomy with curative intent.

Radiomics Signature Based on Support Vector Machines for the Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate the discriminative capabilities of radiomics signatures derived from three distinct machine learning algorithms and to identify a robust radiomics signature capable of predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In a retrospective study, 211 LARC patients were consecutively enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n = 148) and a validation cohort (n = 63). From pretreatment contrast-enhanced planning CT images, a total of 851 radiomics features were extracted. Feature selection and radiomics score (Radscore) construction were performed using three different machine learning methods: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). The SVM-derived Radscore demonstrated a strong correlation with the pCR status, yielding area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.880 and 0.830 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, outperforming the RF and LASSO methods. Based on this, a nomogram was developed by combining the SVM-based Radscore with clinical indicators to predict pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The nomogram exhibited superior predictive power, achieving AUCs of 0.910 and 0.866 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves and decision curve analyses confirmed its appropriateness. The SVM-based Radscore demonstrated promising performance in predicting pCR for LARC patients. The machine learning-driven nomogram, which integrates the Radscore and clinical indicators, represents a valuable tool for predicting pCR in LARC patients.

Use of exosome transcriptome-based analysis to identify novel biomarkers in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

The prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is improved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), especially for patients with pathologic complete response (pCR). Despite the efforts to predict treatment response using multimodality, no molecule has proven to be a strong biomarker. This study aimed to profile the expression of exosome transcriptome that could predict pCR in ESCC before and after nCRT.

Methods

We collected paired blood samples of 15 patients with ESCC who received nCRT and radical surgery. They were divided into 3 groups: (A) residual tumor in the first clinical response evaluation (CRE-1), (B) no residual tumor in CRE-1 but with residual tumor in CRE-2 which was performed after 5-6 weeks, and (C) no residual tumor in CRE-1 or CRE-2. For each patient, the blood sample was collected before nCRT (time point 0); and then 6 weeks after nCRT, the clinical response was evaluated, and another blood sample was collected (time point 1).

Results

Using the intersection of different sets, we found 23 progression-associated messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and 67 remission-associated mRNAs. Between remission-associated mRNAs and the targets of progression-associated (carcinogenic) microRNAs (miRNAs), the intersection was acquired, and 2 miRNA-mRNA networks (IFIT2-miR-3615-IFIT2-miR-484 and BTN3A3-miR-6803-3p) were identified. Among the intersection of progression-associated (carcinogenic) mRNAs and the targets of remission-associated miRNAs, there is a network with miR-132-3p (remission-associated miRNA) located at the core, matched with DICER1, KLHL8, ANKRD12, ASH1L, and IMP4.

Conclusions

Our findings identified altered plasma exosome RNAs among the different groups and between different time points of nCRT, as well as the corresponding enrichments and regulatory networks, which may serve as potentially predictors of treatment response for patients with ESCC after nCRT.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of conservative treatment and surgery for esophageal cancer patients who achieve a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although the clinical complete response (cCR) for esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may be related to the good survival prognosis, the choice of conservative and surgical treatments is still controversial. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of these two treatments.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to retrieve articles published between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2022 on the efficacy of conservative treatment or surgery in esophageal cancer patients who had achieved a cCR after nCRT The predominant endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free-survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for the dichotomous variants by meta-analysis. The software implemented was Stata 16.0 MP. This research was prospectively registered under PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022332143).

Results

Ultimately, eight retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial, comprising 749 patients (nCRT group: 333 and nCRT + surgery group: 416), were included in the meta-analysis after two researchers independently assessed the risk of bias for all included studies. The 2-year OS [OR =1.239, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.891 to 1.723] and 5-year OS (OR =1.369, 95% CI: 0.963 to 1.947) were comparable between the nCRT group and nCRT plus surgery (nCRT + S) group. Patients in the nCRT + S group had significantly longer DFS (2 and 5 years, OR ranging from 0.303 to 0.357) and lower local recurrence rate (OR =0.179, 95% CI: 0.104 to 0.291) than those in the nCRT group. However, the distant metastasis rate was similar between the nCRT group and the nCRT + S group.

Conclusions

Esophageal cancer patients who achieved a cCR after nCRT and received an esophagectomy had better DFS and lower local recurrence than those who received conservative treatment; however, this DFS advantage did not lead to a significant difference in OS. Salvage surgery may be a feasible option for resectable patients who have local recurrence after achieving cCR.

Stage cT3 low rectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors

Background

Whether all cT3 low rectal cancer patients should receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains controversial. The depth of invasion beyond the muscularis propria of the cT3 rectal cancer is of great significance to the selection of a treatment plan and the evaluation of prognosis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 187 patients with stage cT3 low rectal cancer, who had been treated at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from June 2010 to December 2012. The patients were divided into the nCRT group (88 cases) and no-nCRT group (99 cases). Possible significant prognostic factors [i.e., primary tumor volume (PTV), cell differentiation, circumferential resection margin (CRM), nCRT, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lymph node status, surgical procedure, etc.] were collected for estimation of disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastases rate (DM), local recurrence rate (LR). Independent predictive factors or survival were determined using Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The mean PTV was 16.2±11.1 (2.07-72.68) cm³. In the univariate and multivariate analyses: nCRT hazards ratio (HR) =4.258, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.912-9.483 (P<0.001); PTV HR =0.381, 95% CI: 0.181-0.804 (P=0.011); CRM HR =0.227, 95% CI: 0.097-0.532 (P=0.001). For the PTV ≤15 cm³ group, there were no significant differences between the nCRT and no-nCRT group in 3-year follow-up (P>0.05). For the PTV >15 cm³ group, there were significant differences between the nCRT and no-nCRT group in 3-year DFS (84.2% vs. 51.1%; P=0.001), DM (13.1% vs. 31.2%; P=0.017) and LR (2.9% vs. 26.6%; P=0.009). For the CRM negative group, there were significant differences between the nCRT and no-nCRT group in 3-year DFS (94.0% vs. 79.0%; P=0.008), LR (1.5% vs. 10.7%; P=0.028) and DM (4.5% vs. 13.5%; P=0.039).

Conclusions

For stage cT3 low rectal cancer patients, nCRT, PTV, and CRM were independent prognostic factors. NCRT may improve the survival of PTV >15 cm³ patients, but may not have a significant effect on patient with PTV ≤15 cm³ and CRM negative. Direct surgery is recommended for this group of patients.

Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: a retrospective cohort study using the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Both neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT) have survival advantages over surgery alone in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG). However, whether there is a difference in the survival benefit between these two treatments and who can benefit from them remains controversial, and there are currently no randomised controlled trials to address these issues. This study compared the survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced AEG receiving nCRT and aCRT.

METHODS

The data of patients with locally advanced AEG were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015). Patients in the nCRT and aCRT groups were propensity-score matched 1:1, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis between the two groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were performed to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,436 cases diagnosed as locally advanced AEG, we included 442 in the final analysis. The median overall survival (OS) of the nCRT and aCRT cohorts were 30.0 and 25.0 months, respectively (P=0.042), and the median tumour specific survival times were 37.0 and 31.0 months, respectively (P=0.249). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that OS was independently related to age [<60 years vs. ≥70 years, hazard ratio (HR) =0.619, 95% CI: 0.510-0.751, P<0.001; 60-69 years vs. ≥70 years, HR =0.661, 95% CI: 0.536-0.814, P<0.001] and N stage (N2 vs. N1, HR =1.213, 95% CI: 1.002-1.468, P=0.048; N3 vs. N1, HR =1.606, 95% CI: 1.190-2.167, P=0.002). Through stratifying patients by TNM stage, stage IIIB, and N1 stage, we observed that patients receiving nCRT had a better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving nCRT had significantly better survival than those receiving aCRT. nCRT may offer some therapeutic benefits in patients with IIIB stage AEG.

Impact of postoperative lymph node status on the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery are widely used treatments for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Thus, it is critically important to investigate risk factors that affect patient prognosis after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 77 patients with ESCC who received nCRT and underwent surgery at our center from January 2015 to December 2019. We analyzed the primary clinical data, postoperative pathological results, recurrence, and death results.

RESULTS

Among the 77 ESCC patients who received nCRT and surgery, 19 achieved a postoperative pathologic complete response (pCR), and the overall pCR rate was 24.68%. The univariate analysis indicated that postoperative post-neoadjuvant treatment N stage (ypN) metastasis [hazards ratio (HR): 2.908; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.874-9.676; P=0.082], a high lymph-node ratio [(LNR) >0.1] (HR: 7.149, 95% CI: 1.740-29.369; P=0.006), post-neoadjuvant treatment T3-4 (ypT3-4) (HR: 3.626, 95% CI: 0.824-15.956; P=0.088) affected disease-specific survival (DSS). The multivariate analysis indicated that a high LNR (>0.1) (HR: 6.170; 95% CI: 1.472-25.856; P=0.013) was a significant independent predictor of DSS. The univariate analysis indicated that postoperative ypN metastasis (HR: 2.283; 95% CI: 1.047-4.979; P=0.038) and a high LNR (>0.1) (HR: 4.210; 95% CI: 1.547-11.458; P=0.005) were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). The multivariate survival analysis showed that a high LNR (>0.1) (HR: 4.289; 95% CI: 1.538-11.965; P=0.005) was also a significant independent predictor of RFS. In this study, 57 positive lymph nodes were found in 30 of the 77 patients, including 16 left gastric lymph nodes, 9 pericardial lymph nodes, and 7 left supraclavicular lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

A high LNR (>0.1) in ESCC patients after nCRT is a risk factor of DSS and RFS. ypN metastasis is also an independent predictor of RFS. Left gastric-arterial lymph nodes, para-cardiac lymph nodes, and left supraclavicular lymph nodes are the most common sites of metastasis in ESCC after nCRT.

Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment determines survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (NEOCRTEC5010)

BACKGROUND

Few studies have exclusively investigated the value of pathological complete response (pCR), in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, although it is a clinically significant parameter to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on treatment outcome after surgery. The aim of our study was to explore the relationship between pCR after nCRT and survival among patients with local ESCC.

METHODS

All patients receiving nCRT followed by surgery in NEOCRTEC5010-trial (NCT01216527) were included. Non-pCR patients were classified into three subgroups: ypTanyN0M0, ypT0NanyM0 and ypTanyNanyM0. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was employed to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate regression analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify clinicopathological parameters associated with pCR.

RESULTS

Among the 185 patients included, 80 (43.2%) achieved pCR after nCRT. The mean survival time of the pCR group was significantly longer than that of the non-pCR group (92.6 vs. 69.2 months; HR, 2.70; 95% CI: 1.48-4.92; P=0.001). The 5-year OS and DFS of the pCR group were 79.3% and 77% respectively, compared to 54.8% and 51.2%, respectively, in the non-pCR group. The results showed that the OS and DFS of the ypTanyN0M0 group were better than those of the ypT0NanyM0 group and the ypTanyNanyM0 group. We also found that the number of dissected lymph nodes and pCR were independent risk factors for DFS and OS rates.

CONCLUSIONS

pCR after nCRT is an important prognostic indicator of OS and DFS in patients with ESCC. In addition, lymph-node status could represent an important parameter in the prognostic evaluation of esophageal cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen of different doses and intensities for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

Background

There are few studies focused on comparing the toxicity, postoperative complication rate, and survival among patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving a different dose and intensity of vinorelbine plus cisplatin for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery.

Methods

In total, 78 patients diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer that had received a vinorelbine and cisplatin (VP)1 or VP2 regimen for nCRT followed by surgery in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province between June 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The VP1 regimen involved cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, for two cycles. The VP2 regimen involved cisplatin 25 mg/m² on days 1 to 4, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, for two cycles. The rate of adverse events, postoperative complications, and survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) was 97.6 months (85.6-109.7) in the VP2 group, which was not significantly different to that of the VP1 group [hazard ratio (HR), 1.008 (0.999-1.108); P=0.509]. The main toxicity was hematologic adverse events. The VP2 group had significantly higher rates of all grades of anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (all P<0.05), as well as grade 3 or 4 of leukopenia and neutropenia (P<0.05) compared to the VP1 group. Regarding postoperative complications, the VP2 group had a significantly higher rate of pulmonary infection than the VP1 group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with VP2, VP1 showed comparable efficacy in terms of survival, with less hematologic toxicity and postoperative pulmonary infection. Therefore, we recommended that VP1 over VP2 to be the optimized VP neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Genomic characteristics in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) can vary, but there is still no biomarker that can identify the benefiting population. Therefore, biomarkers to predict the outcome of nCRT are needed, as well as elucidation of the mechanism of resistance therapy. We investigated differences of genomic characteristics between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and those with little or no response (pathologic stable disease: pSD) before and after nCRT.

Methods

Fourteen subjects with locally advanced ESCC (7 cases of pCR and 7 of pSD) who received nCRT before undergoing esophagectomy were enrolled. An analysis of whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 27 ESCC tissue samples obtained from the subjects pre and post nCRT was performed.

Results

The number of pretherapy samples displaying loss of chromosome 19p13.11 was higher in the pCR group than in the pSD group (5/6) (P=0.0291, Fisher's exact test). Gain of 19q13.31 was observed significantly more often in the samples obtained following nCRT (5/14). KMT2A missense mutation was found more frequently in the pSD group's pre-nCRT samples than in those of the pCR group (3/6), and following nCRT, new genes such as NF1, KMT2D, NOTCH2, and NIPBL were detected new variations. C/G>G/C (P=0.003) and C/G>A/T (P=0.002) transitions were statistically significantly reduced in every patient after nCRT, with similar observations made in both groups (pCR group: C/G>G/C, P=0.027; C/G>A/T, P=0.004; and pSD group: C/G>G/C, P=0.032; C/G>A/T, P=0.017).

Conclusions

Biomarkers to predict pCR might include 19p13.11 copy number loss and KMT2A missense mutation. Further validation in a prospective study of a larger sample is required.

Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio as a predictive marker for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The hematological markers of systemic inflammation has been proved to be significantly associated with clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer. This retrospectively study was to evaluate the value of the hematological markers in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Methods

A total of 87 patients with newly diagnosed LA-ESCC were retrospectively analyzed. The pretreatment lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were selected as hematological markers.

Results

After nCRT, 26 (29.9%) patients achieved pCR and 61 (70.1%) patients had non-pCR. The LMR was significantly higher in patients who achieved pCR compared to that in patients who did not achieve pCR (4.35±1.68 vs. 3.33±1.13, P=0.002). Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the optimal cut off value of LMR that predicted pCR was 3.73 [area under the curve: 0.712; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.594–0.830; P=0.002], with a sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 77.0%. The pCR rate of patients with LMR ≥3.73 was 53.1%, while the pCR rate of patients with LMR <3.73 was only 16.4% (P<0.001). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that LMR was an independent predictor of pCR [odds ratio: 5.093; 95% CI: 1.658–15.646; P=0.004]. However, in the prediction of OS, a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed that only clinical stage [hazard ratio (HR): 1.970; 95% CI: 1.144–3.391; P=0.014] and pCR (HR: 0.469; 95% CI: 0.237–0.928; P=0.030) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Pre-treatment LMR may predict pCR in LA-ESCC patients who were treated with nCRT. Having pCR is an independent prognostic factor for prolonged survival.

Long-term outcomes by response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background

Response of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may be associated with prognosis, but long-term outcomes based on response to neoadjuvant therapy have not been well evaluated to date.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving nCT/nCRT. To evaluate response to nCT/nCRT, comparisons were made from cT and cN stage to the respective post-neoadjuvant therapy ypT and ypN stages. Based on these comparisons, patients were classified as responders, progressors, or non-responders. Statistical analyses included estimation of survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well as multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

Of 2,028 patients, 30% had a response, 32% progressed, and 38% had no response; 1% of patients experienced pathologic complete response (pCR). Responders were more likely to have received multi-agent chemotherapy (P=0.0001) as well as radiotherapy (RT) (P=0.02) in the neoadjuvant setting. Response to nCT/nCRT was also associated with a higher R0 resection rate (P=0.02). At a median follow-up of 49 months, median overall survival (OS) was higher in responders than non-responders or progressors (29.9 vs. 24.3 vs. 22.2 months, P<0.001). The mean OS for patients experiencing pCR was 55.5 months. On multivariable analysis, treatment response was independently associated with OS (P=0.02).

Conclusions

Response to nCT/nCRT independently predicts long-term outcomes following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; higher rates of treatment response were observed for patients receiving neoadjuvant RT as well as neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy. These results may have implications on strategies to improve response rates.

MRI-Based Radiomics Predicts Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Background: Conventional methods for predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are limited.

Methods: This study retrospectively recruited 134 LARC patients who underwent standard nCRT followed by total mesorectal excision surgery in our institution. Based on pre-operative axial T2-weighted images, machine learning radiomics was performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to test the efficiencies of the predictive model.

Results: Among the 134 patients, 32 (23.9%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR), 69 (51.5%) achieved a good response, and 91 (67.9%) achieved down-staging. For prediction of pCR, good-response, and down-staging, the predictive model demonstrated high classification efficiencies, with an AUC value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83–0.98), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83–0.97), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98), respectively.

Conclusion: Our machine learning radiomics model showed promise for predicting response to nCRT in patients with LARC. Our predictive model based on the commonly used T2-weighted images on pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans has the potential to be adapted in clinical practice.

Novelty and Impact Statements: Methods for predicting the response of the locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC, T3-4, or N+) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is lacking. In the present study, we developed a new machine learning radiomics method based on T2-weighted images. As a non-invasive tool, this method facilitates prediction performance effectively. It achieves a satisfactory overall diagnostic accuracy for predicting of pCR, good response, and down-staging show an AUC of 0.908, 0.902, and 0.930 in LARC patients, respectively.

Surveillance or resection after chemoradiation in esophageal cancer

The treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer continues to evolve. Previously, surgery was considered the foundation of treatment, but chemoradiation (CRT) has taken on a larger role both in the neoadjuvant setting and as definitive treatment. It has become clear that although some patients benefit from esophagectomy after CRT, a large subset of patients likely derive no benefit, and may be harmed by surgery. Some patients are cured from CRT alone and therefore do not need surgery. Another group of patients likely have metastatic disease at the time of local therapy that is just undetected on imaging and also do not benefit from surgery. A third group of patients will have persistent locoregional disease only after CRT. This last group is the subset who will actually benefit from surgery, but this likely comprises only a minority of patients with locally advanced disease. A strategy to maximize survival while minimizing unnecessary surgery is a reasonable goal, but present technology does not allow us to do this with certainty. Thus, the decision of whether to pursue resection or surveillance after CRT can be difficult as clinicians and patients try to balance the goal of maximizing the likelihood of cure against the risk of surgery and its impact on quality of life.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy: is it a superior approach for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Background

Few studies reported the outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in treating patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of nCRT plus MIE (RM) strategy in treating locally advanced resectable ESCC.

Methods

This retrospective study included 175 patients with ESCC undergoing surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy in our institution from 2010 to 2016. Patients were stratified into three groups: RM, [neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) plus MIE] (CM) and [nCT plus open esophagectomy (OE)] (CO).

Results

Seventy-six (43.4%), 42 (24%) and 57 (32.6%) patients received RM, CM and CO approach, respectively. Compared with CO approach, RM or CM approach had shorter operation duration (188±39, 185±37 vs. 209±45 minutes, P=0.004, P=0.009) and less blood loss (124±88, 122±79 vs. 166±92 mL, P=0.001, P=0.003). There was a trend with lower risk of postoperative non-surgical complications in RM and CM approach [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 0.200-1.040; P=0.062; OR 0.41, 0.150-1.160; P=0.093]. There were no differences in 30- and 90-day mortality among all groups. RM approach was more likely to achieve pathological complete regression (27.6% vs. 4.8%, 1.8%, P=0.001, P=0.001) and fewer lymph node metastasis (25.0% vs. 57.1%, 61.4%, P=0.001, P=0.001) than CM or CO approach. Survival analysis revealed a potential trend towards improved overall survival in RM approach compared with CM or CO approach (P=0.098, P=0.166).

Conclusions

RM approach was a safe and efficient strategy in treating locally advanced resectable ESCC.