Evaluating the Risks of Systemic Maternal Ivermectin Exposure During Pregnancy in Human and Vertebrate Animals: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Ivermectin is widely used for the treatment of neglected tropical diseases associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes when infection complicates pregnancy. However, the United States FDA classification and current distribution protocols limit ivermectin treatment in pregnant women because antepartum safety has not been well-established.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a scoping review to address the question of what is known from both human and vertebrate animal studies about the safety of systemic ivermectin exposure during pregnancy.

METHOD

We searched PubMed for adverse outcomes related to systemic ivermectin exposure in human and vertebrate animal pregnancies, including English-language primary articles from 1900 - 2019.

RESULTS

We identified 23 primary articles for evaluation, including 10 human studies and 13 vertebrate animal studies of interest. One prospective randomized, controlled trial investigating the safety of systemic ivermectin exposure during pregnancy and four retrospective human studies did not identify a significant association with adverse birth outcome metrics. Of the three human case reports, two reported uncomplicated prenatal courses and one reported stillbirth and maternal death. A retrospective cross-sectional study concluded a positive association between onchocerciasis and spontaneous abortion, mitigated by ivermectin mass drug administration. While adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed at high doses in mice, rats, and rabbits, there was overall a lack of evidence to support concerns that therapeutic doses of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg) cause adverse pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Further research is warranted to address safety concerns regarding the use of ivermectin in pregnant women in treating and preventing neglected helminth infections that threaten maternal-child health.

Affective disorders: A question of continuing treatment during pregnancy (Review)

Fetal development, especially in the first trimester, has proven to be heavily influenced by external factors, such as chemical intake of medication. Chronic psychiatric treatment might interfere with the anatomical and physiological wellbeing of the fetus, because psychotropic medication proceeds past the placenta, into the amniotic fluid, and can enter breast milk. Hence some of the medications prescribed for mood disorders should be reconsidered during pregnancy, without sub-optimally treating when it is needed. A literature review is presented which systematically collects modern data and synthesizes previous interdisciplinary research findings on the safety of psychiatric treatment for affective disorders during pregnancy (term-based) and lactation. Antidepressants and mood stabilizers, fundamental strategies in treating affective disorders, have been classified by the FDA as C respectively D drugs pertaining to their risk, with some exception. Most guidelines recommend pharmacologically treating moderate-severe depression, preferably with SSRIs. Evidence advocates that drugs should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed and the benefit outweighs the risk to the fetus. However, guidelines the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists state that antidepressants are a preferred first course of treatment and does not take into account the severity of the depression. Among mood-stabilizers, lithium is considered to be the safest option for pregnant women. Anticonvulsants have a higher risk of teratogenicity compared with lithium, with lamotrigine being the safest one. All mood stabilizers should be recommended in the lowest effective doses. There is controversy regarding the safety of second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy and further research is required. Several case reports and meta-reviews have been published in order to emphasize the safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) during pregnancy, but practitioners still stigmatize this procedure. Evaluating the overall risk-benefit ratio should be assessed by the medical care provider, taking into consideration current findings.

Neuromuscular Junction Disorders and Floppy Infant Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

Floppy infant syndrome, also sometimes referred to as rag-doll syndrome, is characterized by hypotonia that could present as either peripheral hypotonia or central. Depending on the origin of hypotonia, the infant will present with different symptoms that ultimately have the characteristic feature of hypotonia. The clinical examination is crucial in diagnosing floppy infant syndrome in the neonate period, but the most critical factor is investigating and diagnosing the underlying cause of hypotonia. Regardless of whether the underlying cause of hypotonia is peripheral or central in origin, the presentation of floppy infant syndrome focuses on observing for the presence or absence of specific signs such as 'frog-leg' posture, significant head lag on traction or pull-to-sit maneuver, or the feeling of 'slipping through the hands' when the infant is held under the arms. Infantile botulism, transient neonatal myasthenia gravis, congenital myasthenia gravis, hypermagnesemia, and aminoglycoside toxicity are all neuromuscular junction disorders that are considered to be a differential diagnosis of floppy infant syndrome. These neuromuscular junction disorders ultimately impact the presence of acetylcholine within the neuromuscular junction. While some of these disorders may impact the acetylcholine receptors, others may cause a depletion within the end-plate anticholinesterase enzyme. A deficiency within the anticholinesterase deficiency may cause desensitization to acetylcholine, which could also cause present with floppy infant syndrome as well. Depending on the underlying causative disorder leading to the presence of floppy infant syndrome, the treatment will vary considerably. Treatment of the underlying causative syndrome resulting in the presentation of floppy infant syndrome deals with the symptoms of hypotonia, and as a result, the decreased muscle tone, diminished tendon reflexes, any feeding or respiratory difficulties diminish.

Antipsychotics in pregnancy and lactation

Research on psychotropic medications during pregnancy and lactation is limited as often involves complex ethical issues. Information on safety of psychotropic drugs during these critical phases is either inconclusive or undetermined. Many women with severe mental illness have unplanned pregnancies and require antipsychotic medication during pregnancy and lactation. Multiple issues have to be considered while choosing safe treatments for pregnant and lactating women and the best approach is to individualize the treatment. Medication should be guided primarily by its safety data and by the psychiatric history of the patient. Important issues to be kept in mind include pre-pregnancy counseling for all women, including planning pregnancies; folate supplementation, discussion with patient and family regarding options, and active liaison with obstetricians, ultrasonologists and pediatricians. Whenever possible, non-pharmacological approaches should be used in addition.