Incidence of shoulder dystocia and risk factors for recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy-A historical register-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder dystocia is a rare obstetric complication, and the risk of recurrence is important for planning future deliveries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The objectives of our study were to estimate the incidence and risk factors for recurrence of shoulder dystocia and to identify women at high risk of recurrence in a subsequent vaginal delivery. The study design was a nationwide register-based study including data from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and National Patient Register in the period 2007-2017. Nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were included for analysis of risk factors in index and subsequent delivery.

RESULTS

During the study period, 6002 cases of shoulder dystocia were reported with an overall incidence among women with vaginal delivery of 1.2%. Among 222 225 nulliparous women with vaginal births, shoulder dystocia complicated 2209 (1.0%) deliveries. A subsequent birth was registered in 1106 (50.1%) of the women with shoulder dystocia in index delivery of which 837 (77.8%) delivered vaginally. Recurrence of shoulder dystocia was reported in 60 (7.2%) with a six-fold increased risk compared with women without a prior history of shoulder dystocia (risk ratio [RR] 5.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.41 to 7.38; adjusted RR 3.06, 95% CI: 2.03 to 4.68). Low maternal height was a significant risk factor for recurrence of shoulder dystocia. In the subsequent delivery, significant risk factors for recurrence were birthweight >4000 g, positive fetal weight difference exceeding 250 g from index to subsequent delivery, stimulation with oxytocin and operative vaginal delivery. In the subsequent pregnancy following shoulder dystocia, women who underwent a planned cesarean (n = 176) were characterized by more advanced age and a higher prevalence of diabetes in the subsequent pregnancy. Furthermore, they had more often experienced operative vaginal delivery, severe perineal lacerations, and severe neonatal complications at the index delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of shoulder dystocia among nulliparous women with vaginal delivery was 1.0% with a 7.2% risk of recurrence in a population where about 50% had a subsequent birth and of these 78% had subsequent vaginal delivery. Important risk factors for recurrence were low maternal height, increase of birthweight ≥250 g from index to subsequent delivery and operative vaginal delivery.

Perinatal risk factors and reactive attachment disorder: A nationwide population-based study

AIM

To examine the association between several perinatal and obstetric risk factors and reactive attachment disorder in children diagnosed in specialised services.

METHODS

In this nested case-control study, 614 cases with reactive attachment disorder and 2423 controls matched with age and sex were identified from Finnish national registers. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the association between a number of perinatal risk factors and reactive attachment disorder.

RESULTS

In the adjusted analysis, a low birthweight of <2500 g was associated with an increased odds of reactive attachment disorder, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.96 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.17, 3.30 and a birthweight of 4000-4499 grams was associated with decreased odds OR 0.49 (95% CI 0.31, 0.75). The odds for being diagnosed with reactive attachment disorder increased with a gestational age of <32 weeks OR 3.72 (95% CI 1.52, 9.10), induced labour OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.03, 1.75) and monitoring in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) OR 1.67 (95% CI 1.09, 2.55).

CONCLUSION

We found associations between low birthweight, preterm birth, NICU admission and reactive attachment disorder. The findings add to the current literature on the understanding of the development of reactive attachment disorder in children.

Obstetric and psychosocial risk factors associated with maternity blues

AIM

To identify risk factors for maternity blues (MB) and to evaluate the impact of obstetric factors on MB prevalence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

194 mothers have completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) 2 days after delivery. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of MB.

RESULTS

57 women (29.4%) were positive at screening. Comparing the two groups, no statistically significant difference was found in age (p = .536), nationality (p = .065) and BMI before pregnancy (p = .224). Interestingly, no significant differences were highlighted in terms of assisted reproduction technology or spontaneous pregnancies and the presence of labor analgesia, while MB was significantly more frequent in case of cesarean section (CS) (p = .035). Statistical differences have been found in previous CS (p = .022), previous voluntary interruption of pregnancy (p = .021), number of previous pregnancies (p = .007), Apgar 5' (p = .026), lower level of education (p = .009), and previous postpartum depression (PPD) (p = .026). A logistic regression analysis was realized according to a multivariate model incorporating all the variables with a p-value ≤.25 in bivariate analysis. In the final model vaginal delivery (OR 0.451, 95% CI [0.224-0.911], p = .026) resulted to be MB protective factor, while a lower level of education (OR 3.657, 95% CI [1.482-9.023], p = .005) as well as previous PPD (OR 4.714, 95% CI [1.273-17.458], p = .020) were identified as independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that a lower education level and a previous PPD resulted to be important risk factors for MB development, while natural delivery was revealed as a protective factor. These results could be used to develop a better and more accurate prevention program after delivery.

The factors associated with mode of delivery in fetuses with congenital heart defects

Objective: It is not evident whether the mode of delivery (MOD) should be modified in pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital heart defects (CHDs). The question as to whether MOD of CHD infants has a significant impact on neonatal outcome remains elusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with MOD and its impact on immediate neonatal outcomes in a cohort of late preterm or term fetuses with CHDs born in a tertiary center.Methods: This retrospective study comprised of singleton pregnancies with known fetal CHDs who delivered after 34 0/7 weeks of gestation over a 7-year period. Fetuses with chromosomal abnormality or stillbirths were excluded. Obstetric risk factors were classified as maternal medical, maternal surgical or fetal comorbidities. MOD was classified as elective cesarean delivery (CD) or attempted vaginal delivery (VD). The latter was further categorized as successful VD or intrapartum CD. The study population was stratified into four categories based on the severity of cardiac abnormalities diagnosed by fetal echocardiography. Immediate neonatal outcomes included Apgar scores and umbilical cord artery pH.Results: Of a total of 222 patients, 79.8% underwent attempted VD and 20.2% had elective CD. Of the attempted VD group, 80.2% had successful VD and 19.8% had intrapartum CD. The frequencies of maternal medical, maternal surgical and fetal comorbidities were higher in the elective CD group than in the attempted VD group and also were higher in the intrapartum CD group than in the successful VD group (p < .05 for all). Multivariate logistic regression models revealed that maternal surgical or fetal comorbidities increased the chance of elective CD and maternal medical or fetal comorbidities decreased the chance of successful VD. The severity of CHDs was not an independent factor that affected MOD. Elective or intrapartum CD did not improve immediate neonatal outcomes.Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that preexisting obstetric comorbidities were significant variables that affected the MOD in fetuses with CHD. Vaginal delivery should be attempted unless obstetric and medical contraindications accompany index pregnancy.

Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To explore and compare perinatal and maternal outcomes in women at 'higher risk' of complications planning home versus obstetric unit (OU) birth.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

OUs and planned home births in England.

POPULATION

8180 'higher risk' women in the Birthplace cohort.

METHODS

We used Poisson regression to calculate relative risks adjusted for maternal characteristics. Sensitivity analyses explored possible effects of differences in risk between groups and alternative outcome measures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Composite perinatal outcome measure encompassing 'intrapartum related mortality and morbidity' (intrapartum stillbirth, early neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, brachial plexus injury, fractured humerus or clavicle) and neonatal admission within 48 hours for more than 48 hours. Two composite maternal outcome measures capturing intrapartum interventions/adverse maternal outcomes and straightforward birth.

RESULTS

The risk of 'intrapartum related mortality and morbidity' or neonatal admission for more than 48 hours was lower in planned home births than planned OU births [adjusted relative risks (RR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.81]. Adjustment for clinical risk factors did not materially affect this finding. The direction of effect was reversed for the more restricted outcome measure 'intrapartum related mortality and morbidity' (RR adjusted for parity 1.92, 95% CI 0.97-3.80). Maternal interventions were lower in planned home births.

CONCLUSIONS

The babies of 'higher risk' women who plan birth in an OU appear more likely to be admitted to neonatal care than those whose mothers plan birth at home, but it is unclear if this reflects a real difference in morbidity. Rates of intrapartum related morbidity and mortality did not differ statistically significantly between settings at the 5% level but a larger study would be required to rule out a clinically important difference between the groups.