1
|
Holmes N, Rea M, Hill RM, Boto E, Leggett J, Edwards LJ, Rhodes N, Shah V, Osborne J, Fromhold TM, Glover P, Montague PR, Brookes MJ, Bowtell R. Naturalistic Hyperscanning with Wearable Magnetoencephalography. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23:5454. [PMID: 37420622 DOI: 10.3390/s23125454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
The evolution of human cognitive function is reliant on complex social interactions which form the behavioural foundation of who we are. These social capacities are subject to dramatic change in disease and injury; yet their supporting neural substrates remain poorly understood. Hyperscanning employs functional neuroimaging to simultaneously assess brain activity in two individuals and offers the best means to understand the neural basis of social interaction. However, present technologies are limited, either by poor performance (low spatial/temporal precision) or an unnatural scanning environment (claustrophobic scanners, with interactions via video). Here, we describe hyperscanning using wearable magnetoencephalography (MEG) based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs). We demonstrate our approach by simultaneously measuring brain activity in two subjects undertaking two separate tasks-an interactive touching task and a ball game. Despite large and unpredictable subject motion, sensorimotor brain activity was delineated clearly, and the correlation of the envelope of neuronal oscillations between the two subjects was demonstrated. Our results show that unlike existing modalities, OPM-MEG combines high-fidelity data acquisition and a naturalistic setting and thus presents significant potential to investigate neural correlates of social interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niall Holmes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Unit 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham NG7 1LD, UK
| | - Molly Rea
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Unit 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham NG7 1LD, UK
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Ryan M Hill
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Unit 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham NG7 1LD, UK
| | - Elena Boto
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Unit 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham NG7 1LD, UK
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - James Leggett
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Lucy J Edwards
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Natalie Rhodes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Vishal Shah
- QuSpin Inc., 331 South 104th Street, Suite 130, Louisville, CO 80027, USA
| | - James Osborne
- QuSpin Inc., 331 South 104th Street, Suite 130, Louisville, CO 80027, USA
| | - T Mark Fromhold
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Paul Glover
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - P Read Montague
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
| | - Matthew J Brookes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Unit 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham NG7 1LD, UK
| | - Richard Bowtell
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iivanainen J, Borna A, Zetter R, Carter TR, Stephen JM, McKay J, Parkkonen L, Taulu S, Schwindt PDD. Calibration and Localization of Optically Pumped Magnetometers Using Electromagnetic Coils. Sensors (Basel) 2022; 22. [PMID: 35459044 DOI: 10.3390/s22083059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the position, orientation, and gain of a magnetic field sensor using a set of (large) electromagnetic coils. We apply the method for calibrating an array of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) for magnetoencephalography (MEG). We first measure the magnetic fields of the coils at multiple known positions using a well-calibrated triaxial magnetometer, and model these discreetly sampled fields using vector spherical harmonics (VSH) functions. We then localize and calibrate an OPM by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the model signals and the OPM responses to the coil fields. We show that by using homogeneous and first-order gradient fields, the OPM sensor parameters (gain, position, and orientation) can be obtained from a set of linear equations with pseudo-inverses of two matrices. The currents that should be applied to the coils for approximating these low-order field components can be determined based on the VSH models. Computationally simple initial estimates of the OPM sensor parameters follow. As a first test of the method, we placed a fluxgate magnetometer at multiple positions and estimated the RMS position, orientation, and gain errors of the method to be 1.0 mm, 0.2°, and 0.8%, respectively. Lastly, we calibrated a 48-channel OPM array. The accuracy of the OPM calibration was tested by using the OPM array to localize magnetic dipoles in a phantom, which resulted in an average dipole position error of 3.3 mm. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using electromagnetic coils to calibrate and localize OPMs for MEG.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cao F, An N, Xu W, Wang W, Yang Y, Xiang M, Gao Y, Ning X. Co-registration Comparison of On-Scalp Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:706785. [PMID: 34483827 PMCID: PMC8414551 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.706785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can non-invasively measure the electromagnetic activity of the brain. A new type of MEG, on-scalp MEG, has attracted the attention of researchers recently. Compared to the conventional SQUID-MEG, on-scalp MEG constructed with optically pumped magnetometers is wearable and has a high signal-to-noise ratio. While the co-registration between MEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) significantly influences the source localization accuracy, co-registration error requires assessment, and quantification. Recent studies have evaluated the co-registration error of on-scalp MEG mainly based on the surface fit error or the repeatability error of different measurements, which do not reflect the true co-registration error. In this study, a three-dimensional-printed reference phantom was constructed to provide the ground truth of MEG sensor locations and orientations relative to MRI. The co-registration performances of commonly used three devices—electromagnetic digitization system, structured-light scanner, and laser scanner—were compared and quantified by the indices of final co-registration errors in the reference phantom and human experiments. Furthermore, the influence of the co-registration error on the performance of source localization was analyzed via simulations. The laser scanner had the best co-registration accuracy (rotation error of 0.23° and translation error of 0.76 mm based on the phantom experiment), whereas the structured-light scanner had the best cost performance. The results of this study provide recommendations and precautions for researchers regarding selecting and using an appropriate device for the co-registration of on-scalp MEG and MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuzhi Cao
- School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Nan An
- School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Weinan Xu
- School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenli Wang
- School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanfei Yang
- School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Min Xiang
- Hangzhou Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou, China.,Research Institute for Frontier Science, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Gao
- Hangzhou Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou, China.,Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Ning
- Hangzhou Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou, China.,Research Institute for Frontier Science, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jas M, Jones SR, Hämäläinen MS. Whole-head OPM-MEG enables noninvasive assessment of functional connectivity. Trends Neurosci 2021; 44:510-512. [PMID: 33965213 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A recent paper by Boto et al. established reliability of noninvasive functional connectivity measurements with a new whole-head optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG) system. This rapidly developing technology enables a conformal sensor array to accommodate different head sizes and opens up new avenues for experiments in more naturalistic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Jas
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Stephanie R Jones
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence Veterans' Administration Medical Center (VAMC), Providence, RI, USA
| | - Matti S Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|