Seccia V, Muscatello L, Dallan I, Bajraktari A, Briganti T, Ursino S, Galli L, Falcone A, Sellari-Franceschini S. Electrochemotherapy and its controversial results in patients with head and neck cancer.
Anticancer Res 2014;
34:967-972. [PMID:
24511041]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is proposed as an innovative treatment for cutaneous and subcutaneous primary and secondary malignancies. Its actual application is limited to palliative treatment but recent experience predisposes for its utilization as neoadjuvant and first-line treatment. We explored the clinical application of ECT in a population of patients with head and neck cancer and we critically analyzed our results.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Nine patients (four females; mean age=62.7 years) with recurrent or persistent squamous cell cancer in the head and neck area were treated with electrochemotherapy (ECT), with the aim of controlling local neoplastic growth and diminish local symptoms (pain, bleeding).
RESULTS
Our results in terms of local control and impact on quality of life were evaluated: among 14 lesions assessable for the study, 6/14 lesions exhibited a partial response, 4/14 a complete response, and in four cases we observed progression of the disease.
CONCLUSION
Our personal experience in a heterogeneous, small group of patients with head and neck cancer gave controversial results, with disputable advantages in terms of quality of life improvement. We believe that the critical aspects of ECT in patients with head and neck cancer need to be further analyzed in order to better focus on the role of ECT for head and neck cancer.
Collapse