Double pigtail tube drainage for large multiloculated pyogenic liver abscesses

Background

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of double pigtail tube drainage compared with single pigtail tube drainage for the treatment of multiloculated pyogenic liver abscesses greater than 5 cm.

Patients and Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed patients with pyogenic liver abscess admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College between May 2013 and May 2021. Patients with pyogenic liver abscess more than 5 cm in size, who underwent drainage of the abscess with either double pigtail or single pigtail tube, were included.

Results

A total of 97 patients with pyogenic liver abscesses larger than 5 cm were studied. These included 34 patients with double pigtail tube drainage and 63 patients with single pigtail tube drainage. The postoperative hospital stay (13.39 ± 4.21 days vs. 15.67 ± 7.50 days; P = 0.045), and time for removal of the catheter (17.23 ± 3.70 days vs. 24.11 ± 5.83 days; P = 0.038) were lower in the double pigtail tube group compared with the single pigtail tube group. The rate of reduction, in three days, of c-reactive protein levels was 26.61 ± 14.11 mg/L/day in the double pigtail tube group vs. 20.06 ± 11.74 mg/L/day in the single pigtail tube group (P = 0.025). The diameter of the abscess cavity at discharge was 3.1 ± 0.07 cm in the double pigtail tube group as compared with 3.7 ± 0.6 cm in the single pigtail tube group (P = 0.047). There was no bleeding in any of the patients despite abnormal coagulation profiles. There was no recurrence of abscess within six months of discharge and no death in the double pigtail tube group. Conclusion: Double pigtail tube drainage treatment in multiloculated pyogenic liver abscesses greater than 5 cm in size, is safe and effective.

Prospective randomized comparative study of percutaneous catheter drainage and percutaneous needle aspiration in the treatment of liver abscess

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of liver abscess.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, JN Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, India, between February 2018 and August 2019, after getting approval from the institutional ethics committee. A total of 543 patients with liver abscess were randomized into two groups using computer-generated randomization method. Appropriate details regarding patients' clinico-demographic profile and investigations were also collected. The effectiveness of either treatment was measured in terms of duration of intravenous antibiotic, clinical improvement, reduction in the size of cavity, treatment success rate, duration of hospital stay including long-term outcomes such as sonographic resolution of cavity and recurrence rate at 6 months post-treatment.

RESULTS

The PCD group had statistically significant rate of duration of antibiotics need, days for clinical improvement and time for 50% reduction in abscess cavity and treatment success rate with comparable long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

PCD is more efficient than PNA and can be used primarily in the treatment of both amoebic and pyogenic liver abscesses along with systemic antibiotics. However, PNA can serve as a safe alternative when PCD is not available.

Sonographically guided percutaneous treatment of liver abscesses in critically Ill patients

BACKGROUND

The management of liver abscess (LA) has shifted toward intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics and image-guided percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) or percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD).

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous treatment for patients with LA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 264 patients with 354 LA treated by percutaneous management from 1989 to 2012. All patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients with LA <50 mm in diameter were initially treated by sonographic-guided PNA and those with LA ≥50 mm were initially treated by ultrasound ultrasound-guided PCD. Surgery was planned only when there was no clinical improvement after the initial nonsurgical treatment. Primary outcome was the conversion rate to surgery. Secondary outcomes were mortality, length of hospital stay, and the procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

PNA was performed initially in 116 patients (44%), with 70 of them later requiring PCD due to abscess recurrence. In 148 patients (56%), PCD was performed initially. PCD was performed twice or more in 63 patients. Percutaneous treatment was the definitive and successful treatment in 230 of 264 patients (87.1%). Twenty patients (7.7%) were converted to surgery. Twenty-one patients (7.9%) died. The median hospital stay was 12 (range, 9-18) days, with complications occurring in 23 patients (8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous management with systemic antibiotics is effective and safe and allows resolution of most LA. However, a small proportion of patients with LA still requires surgical drainage.