1
|
Karczewski D, Schönnagel L, Hipfl C, Akgün D, Hardt S. Periprosthetic hip infection in octogenarians : a single institution experience of 33 cases. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:135-139. [PMID: 36722065 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b2.bjj-2022-1035.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty in the elderly may occur but has been subject to limited investigation. This study analyzed infection characteristics, surgical outcomes, and perioperative complications of octogenarians undergoing treatment for PJI in a single university-based institution. METHODS We identified 33 patients who underwent treatment for PJIs of the hip between January 2010 and December 2019 using our institutional joint registry. Mean age was 82 years (80 to 90), with 19 females (57%) and a mean BMI of 26 kg/m2 (17 to 41). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was 3 (1 to 4) and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6 (4 to 10). Leading pathogens included coagulase-negative Staphylococci (45%) and Enterococcus faecalis (9%). Two-stage exchange was performed in 30 joints and permanent resection arthroplasty in three. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. Mean follow-up was five years (3 to 7). RESULTS The two-year survivorship free of any recurrent PJI was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56 to 89; 18 patients at risk). There were a total of nine recurrent PJIs at a mean of one year (16 days to eight years), one for the same pathogen as at index infection. One additional surgical site infection was noted at two weeks, resulting in a 69% (95% CI 52 to 86; 17 patients at risk) survivorship free of any infection at two years. There were two additional revisions for dislocations at one month each. As such, the two-year survivorship free of any revision was 61% (95% CI 42 to 80; 12 patients at risk). In addition to the aforementioned revisions, there was one additional skin grafting for a decubitus ulcer, resulting in a survivorship free of any reoperation of 54% (95% CI 35 to 73; ten patients at risk) at two years. Mean Clavien-Dindo score of perioperative complications was two out of five, with one case of perioperative death noted at six days. CONCLUSION Octogenarians undergoing surgery for PJI of the hip are at low risk of acute mortality, but are at moderate risk of other perioperative complications. One in two patients will undergo a reoperation within two years, with 70% attributable to recurrent infections.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):135-139.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Karczewski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Charité Berlin, University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Schönnagel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christian Hipfl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sebastian Hardt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
AIMS This study evaluated the definitions developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013, for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS In this single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, patients with an indicated revision surgery after a total hip or knee arthroplasty were included between 2015 and 2020. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed, identifying the components of the EBJIS, ICM, and IDSA criteria in each patient. RESULTS Of 206 included patients, 101 (49%) were diagnosed with PJI with the EBJIS definition. IDSA and ICM diagnosed 99 (48%) and 86 (42%) as infected, respectively. A total of 84 cases (41%) had an infection based on all three criteria. In 15 cases (n = 15/206; 7%), PJI was present when applying only the IDSA and EBJIS criteria. No infection was detected by one definition alone. Inconclusive diagnoses occurred more frequently with the ICM criteria (n = 30/206; 15%) compared to EBJIS (likely infections: n = 16/206; 8%) (p = 0.029). A better preoperative performance of the EBJIS definition was seen compared with the ICM and IDSA definitions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The novel EBJIS definition identified all PJIs diagnosed by any other criteria. Use of the EBJIS definition significantly reduced the number of uncertain diagnoses, allowing easier clinical decision-making.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(9):608-618.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene K Sigmund
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Luger
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reinhard Windhager
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin A McNally
- The Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Sloten M, Gómez-Junyent J, Ferry T, Rossi N, Petersdorf S, Lange J, Corona P, Araújo Abreu M, Borens O, Zlatian O, Soundarrajan D, Rajasekaran S, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. Should all patients with a culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection be treated with antibiotics? : a multicentre observational study. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:183-188. [PMID: 34969292 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b1.bjj-2021-0693.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld. METHODS A multicentre observational study was undertaken: 1,553 acute and 1,556 chronic PJIs, diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Culture-negative PJIs were diagnosed according to the Muskuloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS) definitions. The primary outcome was recurrent infection, and the secondary outcome was removal of the prosthetic components for any indication, both during a follow-up period of two years. RESULTS None of the acute PJIs and 70 of the chronic PJIs (4.7%) were culture-negative; a total of 36 culture-negative PJIs (51%) were treated with antibiotics, particularly those with histological signs of infection. After two years of follow-up, no recurrent infections occurred in patients in whom antibiotics were withheld. The requirement for removal of the components for any indication during follow-up was not significantly different in those who received antibiotics compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld (7.1% vs 2.9%; p = 0.431). CONCLUSION When adequate methods of culture are used, the incidence of culture-negative PJIs is low. In patients with culture-negative PJI, antibiotic treatment can probably be withheld if there are no histological signs of infection. In all other patients, diagnostic efforts should be made to identify the causative microorganism by means of serology or molecular techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):183-188.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime van Sloten
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Joan Gómez-Junyent
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobial Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), CEXS-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tristan Ferry
- Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hospital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolò Rossi
- Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospital IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sabine Petersdorf
- Institute of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, HELIOS University Clinic Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Jeppe Lange
- H-HiP, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Horsens, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pablo Corona
- Septic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Araújo Abreu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto. GRIP, Porto Bone & Joint infection group, Porto, Portugal
| | - Olivier Borens
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Septic surgical Unit, University Hospital of Lausanne, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ovidiu Zlatian
- Department of Microbiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | | | - S Rajasekaran
- Department of Orthopaedics, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdelaziz H, Schröder M, Shum Tien C, Ibrahim K, Gehrke T, Salber J, Citak M. Resection of the proximal femur during one-stage revision for infected hip arthroplasty : risk factors and effectiveness. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:1678-1685. [PMID: 34719276 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b11.bjj-2021-0022.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions. METHODS In this single-centre, case-control study, 57 patients who underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip and required resection of the proximal femur between 2009 and 2018 were identified. The control group consisted of 57 patients undergoing one-stage revision without bony resection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any correlation with resection and the risk factors for re-revisions. Rates of all-causes re-revision, reinfection, and instability were compared between groups. RESULTS Patients who required resection of the proximal femur were found to have a higher all-cause re-revision rate (29.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.018), largely due to reinfection (15.8% vs 0%; p = 0.003), and dislocation (8.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.762), and showed higher rate of in-hospital wound haematoma requiring aspiration or evacuation (p = 0.013), and wound revision (p = 0.008). The use of of dual mobility components/constrained liner in the resection group was higher than that of controls (94.7% vs 36.8%; p < 0.001). The presence and removal of additional metal hardware (odds ratio (OR) = 7.2), a sinus tract (OR 4), ten years' time interval between primary implantation and index infection (OR 3.3), and previous hip revision (OR 1.4) increased the risk of proximal femoral resection. A sinus tract (OR 9.2) and postoperative dislocation (OR 281.4) were associated with increased risk of subsequent re-revisions. CONCLUSION Proximal femoral resection during one-stage revision hip arthroplasty for PJI may be required to reduce the risk of of recurrent or further infection. Patients with additional metalware needing removal or transcortical sinus tracts and chronic osteomyelitis are particularly at higher risk of needing proximal femoral excision. However, radical resection is associated with higher surgical complications and increased re-revision rates. The use of constrained acetabular liners and dual mobility components maintained an acceptable dislocation rate. These results, including identified risk factors, may aid in preoperative planning, patient consultation and consent, and intraoperative decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1678-1685.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein Abdelaziz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Schröder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Calvin Shum Tien
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kahled Ibrahim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Salber
- Department of Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital, Bochum, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zargaran A, Zargaran D, Trompeter AJ. The role of Vitamin D in orthopaedic infection: a systematic literature review. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:721-727. [PMID: 34488428 PMCID: PMC8479837 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.29.bjo-2020-0192.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Orthopaedic infection is a potentially serious complication of elective and emergency trauma and orthopaedic procedures, with a high associated burden of morbidity and cost. Optimization of vitamin D levels has been postulated to be beneficial in the prevention of orthopaedic infection. This study explores the role of vitamin D in orthopaedic infection through a systematic review of available evidence. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted on databases including Medline and Embase, as well as grey literature such as Google Scholar and The World Health Organization Database. Pooled analysis with weighted means was undertaken. Results Pooled analysis of four studies including 651 patients found the mean 25(OH)D level to be 50.7 nmol/l with a mean incidence of infection of 70%. There was a paucity of literature exploring prophylactic 25(OH)D supplementation on reducing orthopaedic infection, however, there was evidence of association between low 25(OH)D levels and increased incidence of orthopaedic infection. Conclusion The results indicate a significant proportion of orthopaedic patients have low 25(OH]D levels, as well as an association between low 25(OH)D levels and orthopaedic infection, but more randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to establish the benefit of prophylactic supplementation and the optimum regimen by dose and time. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):721–727.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Zargaran
- King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sigmund IK, McNally MA, Luger M, Böhler C, Windhager R, Sulzbacher I. Diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil counts in histopathological tissue analysis in periprosthetic joint infection using the ICM, IDSA, and EBJIS criteria. Bone Joint Res 2021; 10:536-547. [PMID: 34409845 PMCID: PMC8414440 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.108.bjr-2021-0058.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Histology is an established tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Different thresholds, using various infection definitions and histopathological criteria, have been described. This study determined the performance of different thresholds of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (≥ 5 PMN/HPF, ≥ 10 PMN/HPF, ≥ 23 PMN/10 HPF) , when using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria for PJI. Methods A total of 119 patients undergoing revision total hip (rTHA) or knee arthroplasty (rTKA) were included. Permanent histology sections of periprosthetic tissue were evaluated under high power (400× magnification) and neutrophils were counted per HPF. The mean neutrophil count in ten HPFs was calculated (PMN/HPF). Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the z-test, thresholds were compared. Results Using the EBJIS criteria, a cut-off of ≥ five PMN/HPF showed a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81 to 98) and specificity of 84% (95% CI 74 to 91). The optimal threshold when applying the IDSA and ICM criteria was ≥ ten PMN/HPF with sensitivities of 94% (95% CI 79 to 99) and 90% (95% CI 76 to 97), and specificities of 86% (95% CI 77 to 92) and 92% (95% CI 84 to 97), respectively. In rTKA, a better performance of histopathological analysis was observed in comparison with rTHA when using the IDSA criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusion With high accuracy, histopathological analysis can be supported as a confirmatory criterion in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections. A threshold of ≥ five PMN/HPF can be recommended to distinguish between septic and aseptic loosening, with an increased possibility of detecting more infections caused by low-virulence organisms. However, neutrophil counts between one and five should be considered suggestive of infection and interpreted carefully in conjunction with other diagnostic test methods. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(8):536–547.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene K Sigmund
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Markus Luger
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Böhler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reinhard Windhager
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Irene Sulzbacher
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|