Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in the early development phase of anti-psychotics: a comparison of the effects of clozapine, S 16924 and S 18327 in the EEG model in rats

1. The use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis in early compound development was investigated in the rat for two developmental anti-psychotic compounds with clozapine as a positive control. 2. Three plasma samples were collected from each of eight animals according to a pre-defined sampling matrix allowing a total of 12 time points for PK analysis. Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG), particularly the theta and beta frequencies, was used as a measurement of pharmacological effect. 3. PK/KD modelling of the sparse PK data available relative to a rich set of PD data was achieved using a population approach in NONMEM (IV). Individual PK parameter estimates were incorporated into a PK/PD model. 4. Qualitative EEG changes in rat and human were similar for clozapine, but different for the two developmental compounds, suggesting that changes in these PD parameters may not be specifically related to the anti-psychotic activity. 5. Although no definitive data are available concerning the signal specificity of EEG frequency bands with respect to dopaminergic or serotonergic receptor activity, qualitative and quantitative differences seen in EEG parameters are likely to result from the multiple receptor occupancy for these compounds. 6. The results confirm the value of population PK/PD modelling in conjunction with sparse sampling to enable determination of concentration effect relationships in the pre-clinical development programme of CNS-active drugs.

Modelling of the pharmacodynamic interaction between phenytoin and sodium valproate

Treatment of epilepsy with a combination of antiepileptic drugs remains the therapeutic choice when monotherapy fails. In this study, we apply pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to characterize the interaction between phenytoin (PHT) and sodium valproate (VPA). Male Wistar rats received a 40 mg kg(-1) intravenous dose of PHT over 5 min either alone or in combination with an infusion of VPA resulting in a steady-state concentration of 115.5+/-4.9 microg ml(-1). A control group received only the infusion of VPA. The increase in the threshold for generalized seizure activity (ATGS) was used as measure of the anticonvulsant effect. PHT pharmacokinetics was described by a pharmacokinetic model with Michaelis-Menten elimination. The concentration-time course and plasma protein binding of PHT were not altered by VPA. The pharmacokinetic parameters Vmax and Km were, respectively, 294+/-63 microg min(-1) and 7.8+/-2.4 microg ml(-1) in the absence of VPA and 562+/-40 microg min(-1) and 15.6+/-0.9 microg ml(-1) upon administration in combination with VPA. A delay of the onset of the effect relative to plasma concentrations of PHT was observed. The assessment of PHT concentrations at the effect site was based on the effect-compartment model, yielding mean ke0 values of 0.128 and 0.107 min(-1) in the presence and absence of VPA, respectively. A nonlinear relationship between effect-site concentration and the increase in the TGS was observed. The concentration that causes an increase of 50% in the baseline TGS (EC50%TGS) was used to compare drug potency. A shift of EC50%TGS from 13.27+3.55 to 4.32+/-0.52 microg ml(-1) was observed upon combination with VPA (P<0.01). It is concluded that there is a synergistic pharmacodynamic interaction between PHT and VPA in vivo.