Efficacy and Safety of Erbium-YAG Laser Ablation Therapy in Superficial Dermatoses: The Workhorse of Dermatology

Background

Erbium-YAG laser has been the working horse in dermatology for years. Surprisingly, data on the efficacy and adverse effects of this novel resurfacing and ablative technique of erbium-YAG laser for superficial dermatoses in Indian skin is limited.

Aim and Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of erbium-YAG laser ablation in superficial cutaneous lesions.

Materials and Methods

Two hundred and fifty patients of various superficial dermatoses, treatable by erbium-YAG laser, were recruited in the study. All the patients were subjected to erbium-YAG laser sessions. The number of laser sessions, fluence, frequency and other parameters were individualized as per the respective dermatosis. The clinical response was evaluated as grade 4 (100% lesion clearance), grade 3 (75-99%), grade 2 (50-75%) or grade 1 (<50%).

Results

The overall mean age of our study group was 37.70 years. In our study, 52.38% cases of verruca plana, 36.84% cases of seborrheic keratosis, 56.4% cases of xanthelasma palpebrarum, 22% cases of acquired melanocytic nevus, 23.8% cases of plantar wart and 40% cases of sebaceous hyperplasia showed complete clearance. The most common adverse effect was post-laser erythema in 50.4% of cases, followed by pain in 36.8%. Besides this, scarring and dyspigmentation were observed in 11.6% and 12% of cases, respectively. The rate of recurrence on 3 months follow-up was 9 (23.07%) cases in xanthelasma palpebrarum, 11 (28.9%) cases in seborrheic keratosis, 10 (23.8%) cases in verruca plana and 9 (42.8%) cases in plantar warts.

Conclusion

This study suggested that erbium-YAG ablation achieved good results for superficial lesions like verruca plana, seborrheic keratosis, xanthelasma palpebrarum, plantar wart, sebaceous hyperplasia and acquired melanocytic nevus. Thus, Er: YAG laser can offer a one-step procedure with better cosmetic results and a lesser rate of recurrence.

Nowarta110 Topical Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Plantar Warts: A Phase I/II Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND/AIM

Plantar warts are cutaneous lesions on the plantar aspect of the foot caused by the infection of keratinocytes with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The severity and magnitude of warts can vary, but they cause pain and discomfort for all age groups. The treatment for plantar warts remains a continuing challenge. The purpose of this research was to compare the efficacy and safety of naturally derived Nowarta110 topical formula versus a matching placebo in treating plantar warts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study is a randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment control interventional phase I/II clinical trial. This study included 54 patients with plantar warts. Patients were randomized to two groups: the placebo group, which included 26 patients treated with a matching placebo and the Nowarta110 group, which included 28 patients who received topical Nowarta110. The diagnosis of plantar warts was made by clinical examination. The treatment's efficacy and safety were assessed every week and after 6 weeks from the initiation of the intervention.

RESULTS

In the Nowata110 group, 18 patients (64.3%) were completely cleared of their warts, and 10 patients (35.7%) partially responded to the therapy with a 20% to 80% decrease in warts dimensions. In the placebo group, only 2 patients (7.7%) were completely cleared of their warts, and 3 patients (11.5%) partially responded to the intervention with a 10% to 35% decrease in warts dimensions. The difference was highly significant between the two groups. There was 1 event with minor pain as a side effect in the Nowarta110 group and 9 events of non-serious local side effects in the placebo group, which included 2 patients who dropped out.

CONCLUSION

Topical Nowarta110 is a safe, well-tolerated, and highly effective therapeutic modality in treating refractory and recurrent plantar warts. The breakthrough findings of the study encourage further extensive clinical trials to fully explore the prospect of Nowarta110 in managing all types of warts and HPV-related diseases.

Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous warts (2022)

AIM

Cutaneous warts caused by human papillomavirus are benign proliferative lesions that occur at any ages in human lives. Updated, comprehensive and systematic evidence-based guidelines to guide clinical practice are urgently needed.

METHODS

We collaborated with multidisciplinary experts to formulate this guideline based on evidences of already published literature, focusing on 13 clinical questions elected by a panel of experts. We adopted Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to form classification of recommendations as well as the improved Delphi method to retain respective recommendations with a consensus degree of over 80%.

RESULTS

Our guideline covered aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous warts such as diagnostic gold standard, transmission routes, laboratory tests, treatment principle, clinical cure criterion, definitions, and treatments of common warts, flat warts, plantar warts, condyloma acuminatum, and epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Recommendations about special population such as children and pregnant women are also listed. In total, 49 recommendations have been obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

It is a comprehensive and systematic evidence-based guideline and we hope this guideline could systematically and effectively guide the clinical practice of cutaneous warts and improve the overall levels of medical services.

From the Cochrane Library: Topical Treatments for Cutaneous Warts

Collapse

Comparison of 40% trichloroacetic acid and cryotherapy for the treatment of plantar warts: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial

Plantar warts can cause pain near the toes and the sole of the foot and may result in referral for treatment. This study was aimed at comparing 40% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and cryotherapy (Cryo) for the treatment of plantar warts. This single-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on 60 subjects presenting with plantar wart in Sabzevar, Iran in 2018. The first intervention group was treated with 40% TCA in four sessions within 4 weeks. The second intervention group was treated with Cryo using liquid nitrogen in four sessions within 8 weeks. The mean (SD) age of subjects was 20.16 ± 5.96 years and 68.33% (n = 41) were male. Although the resolution rate of warts in the TCA 40% group was greater than the Cryo group, there was no statistical association found between the two groups by adjusting age, sex, and basal time (P = .648). Findings suggest that although 40% TCA was almost as effective as Cryo in the treatment of plantar warts, considering the lower adverse effects of TCA 40% group as compared to the Cryo group, it could be a proper alternative.

CO2 laser treatment for plantar warts in children: A case series

Several types of human papillomaviruses induce warts. Warts are one of the most common infections in childhood with a reported prevalence of up to 20%. Warts are divided clinically into genital and nongenital forms. Plantar warts are common nongenital warts. In this series, five pediatric cases treated with CO₂ laser for their plantar warts are presented. One patient was a known case of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Three of our patients had history of unsuccessful treatments with other modalities, while the other had received no previous treatment. CO₂ laser with continuous mode (focused and defocused) was used. In our cases, only one session was enough for clearance of the warts. All the patients were visited 1 week and 3 months after treatment to assess the efficacy and any possible recurrences. Follow-up showed that all the patients remained in remission up to 3 months posttreatment with no adverse events.

Tandem repeats of TSER significantly influence the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of plantar warts

AIM

To identify potential genetic risk markers associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment outcomes in plantar warts patients.

METHODS

In this study, 126 plantar warts patients were treated with an intralesional mixture of 5-FU, lidocaine and epinephrine. Treatment outcomes were compared with DNA mutation analysis.

RESULTS

More patients with TSER 3R/3R genotype failed 5-FU treatment than TSER 2R/3R+2R/2R (72.1 vs 43.8%; odds ratio: 3.32; 95% CI: 1.26-8.72; p = 0.013). In addition, the regression modeling identified patient age and TSER 3R allele as covariates of the risk of 5-FU treatment failure (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

 TSER 3R/3R of TYMS gene was found to be the major risk of treatment failure. This genetic marker provides a potential treatment stratification target to modulate 5-FU treatment in plantar wart patients.

Topical adapalene in the treatment of plantar warts; randomized comparative open trial in comparison with cryo-therapy

Background:

Various therapeutic modalities, which are available for treating plantar wart, have not been successful every time.

Aims:

To evaluate topical adapalene under occlusion in the treatment of plantar warts and compare it with cryo-therapy.

Materials and Methods:

50 patients with 424 plantar warts were included in this single center, two arm, prospective, randomized, control, open study. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups consisting of 25 patients each. Group A patients having 299 plantar warts were treated using adapalene gel 0.1% under occlusion while Group B patients having 125 warts were treated using cryo-therapy. All the patients were evaluated weekly till the clearance of all the warts and the results compared.

Result:

All the warts of 25 patients of Group A that were treated using adapalene gel 0.1% cleared in 36.71 ± 19.24 (55.95-17.47) days except those in one patient. In Group B, warts in all except one treated by cryo-therapy cleared in 52.17 ± 30.06 (82.23-22.11) days. There were no side effects like scar formation, irritation, erythema, or infections with adapalene group while in the cryo group scar was seen in 2 patients, pain in 24, erythema in 10, and infection in 3 patients.

Conclusion:

Adapalene gel 0.1% under occlusion is an effective, safe and easy to use treatment for plantar warts and may help clear lesions faster than cryo-therapy.