Eltrombopag can promote platelet implantation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as safely and similarly to thrombopoietin

Background

Eltrombopag has demonstrated efficacy in treating low platelet (PLT) levels, but it remains unclear whether eltrombopag can promote PLT engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods

Forty-one HSCT patients received eltrombopag 50 mg/d from +1 day until PLT >50 × 109/L or 1 month after HSCT. Fifty-one patients in the same period received thrombopoietin (TPO) to promote PLT graft after HSCT and served as a control group.

Results

A total of 51 patients who applied TPO during the same period were treated as a control. In the eltrombopag group, the median time to white blood cells (WBC) graft was 12 days (range, 10-17 days) and the PLT graft was 15 days (range, 10-30 days), whereas for the patients in the TPO group, the median time to WBC and PLT graft was 12 days (range, 9-23 days) and 15.5 days (range, 9-41 days), respectively. In the first month after HSCT, the median WBC count in the eltrombopag group was 4.41 × 109/L (range, 0.87-40.01 × 109/L) and the median PLT was 89x109/L (range, 30-401 × 109/L); the median WBC and PLT \counts in the TPO group were 4.65 × 109/L (range, 0.99-23.63 × 109/L) and 86 × 109/L (range, 5-512 × 109/L), respectively. Patients in the TPO or eltrombopag group did not experience serious side effects after drug administration, and the difference in side effects on liver and kidney function between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Eltrombopag is safe and similarly promotes platelet engraftment to thrombopoietin after allogeneic HSCT.

Clinical Impact of Recipient-Derived Isoagglutinin Levels in ABO-Incompatible Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

ABO incompatibility is not considered a contraindication for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We hypothesized that recipient-derived isoagglutinin (RDI) levels could play a critical role in clinical outcomes. In this study, we compared clinical outcomes such as survival, GVHD, infection, relapse, transfusion, and engraftment, among ABO-compatible patients (ABOc), ABO-incompatible patients (ABOi) with low RDI, and ABOi patients with high RDI. The ABOi with high RDI group was defined as recipients with more than 1:16 RDI levels. We analyzed 103 recipients (ABOc, 53; ABOi with low RDI, 36; ABOi with high RDI, 14). The ABOi with high RDI group showed a decreased 1-year survival and increased acute GVHD grade IV and RBC transfusion (p = 0.017, 0.027, and 0.032, respectively). The ABOi with high RDI group was an independent risk factor for increased death, RBC transfusion, and poor platelet (PLT) engraftment (odds ratio (OR) = 3.20, p = 0.01; OR = 8.28, p = 0.02; OR = 0.18, p = 0.03, respectively). The ABOi with high RDI group showed significantly delayed PLT engraftment. In conclusion, this is the first study underscoring high RDI levels as a marker predicting unfavorable outcomes in ABOi HSCT.

Oral eltrombopag versus subcutaneous recombinant human thrombopoietin for promoting platelet engraftment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A prospective, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial

Delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) is associated with poor survival and increased transplantation-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Therefore, treatments are needed to improve platelet engraftment and prevent DPE. We performed a phase three, non-inferior, randomized controlled study of eltrombopag or recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) to promot platelet engraftment after allo-HSCT. Candidates for allo-HSCT were randomly assigned to receive oral eltrombopag (50 mg daily) or subcutaneous rhTPO (15000U daily) from the first-day post-transplantation. The primary endpoint was the cumulative numbers of platelet engraftment (platelet recovery ≥20 × 10⁹ /L, without transfusion, for seven consecutive days) on day 60 after transplantation. We performed intention-to-treat analyses with a non-inferior margin of -15%. A total of 92 participants underwent randomization. 44 and 48 patients were randomized to the eltrombopag and rhTPO groups, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 360 days (range: 12-960 days). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment on day 60 after transplantation in eltrombopag group was 86.4% (38/44) compared with 85.4% (41/48) in the rhTPO group (absolute risk difference [ARD] 1%, one-sided lower limit of 95% confidence interval [CI] -13.28%, P_{non-inferirioty}  = 0.014). The rate of DPE in the eltrombopag group was 6.8% (3/44) compared with 12.5% (6/48) in the rhTPO group (ARD -5.7%, one-sided higher limit of 95% CI 6.28%, P_{non-inferirioty}  = 0.063). Approximately, three-fourths of non-hematologic adverse events were not observed in the eltrombopag group but three patients (3/48, 6%) experienecd them in the rhTPO group. In addition, platelet transfusions unite from day 0 to day 21, or from day 22 to day 60, progression-free survival, overall survival were not significantly different between both groups. Eltrombopag was non-inferior to rhTPO in promoting platelet engraftment post allo-HSCT for patients with hematological malignancy. Oral eltrombopag was more convenient for patients than subcutaneous rhTPO (NCT03515096).

Efficacy of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin for the Treatment of Secondary Failure of Platelet Recovery After Allogeneic HSCT

Secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) is a life-threatening complication that may affect up to 20% of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), we retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who received continuous rhTPO for the treatment of SFPR. Overall response and complete response were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients and 10 (34.5%) patients, at a median time of 21.5 days (range, 3-41 days) and 39.5 days (range, 7-53 days) after initiation of rhTPO treatment, respectively. Among the responders, the probability of keeping overall response and complete response at 1 year after response was 77.3% and 80.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher CD34⁺ cells (≥3 × 10⁶/kg) infused during HSCT (HR: 7.22, 95% CI: 1.53-34.04, P = 0.01) and decreased ferritin after rhTPO treatment (HR: 6.16, 95% CI: 1.18-32.15, P = 0.03) were indicated to associate with complete response to rhTPO. Importantly, rhTPO was well tolerated in all patients without side effects urging withdrawal and clinical intervention. The results of this study suggest that rhTPO may be a safe and effective treatment for SFPR.

Impact of G-CSF administration post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) have been used post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for earlier neutrophil engraftment. The use of G-CSFs, and their effect on other post-HSCT outcomes remains debatable. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and IndMed using a predefined search strategy. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) reporting data on G-CSF administration post-HSCT, published in the English language from their inception until Jan 31, 2021. The primary outcome of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the time to neutrophil engraftment (NE). The secondary outcomes were probability of NE, time to platelet engraftment (PE), the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), duration of hospital stay (HS), and overall survival (OS). The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020206989). Fourteen studies were extracted (n=9850), of which five were RCTs, and nine were NRSs. As per Egger's test, publication bias was not present for any outcome. After meta-analysis, we found that the duration of NE favouring G-CSF arm from RCTs was -0.94 days (SMD) [(95% CI: -1.38, -0.51); I²=35%], and from NRSs -1.2 days (SMD) [(95% CI: -1.43, -0.96); I²=74%]. For the outcome of GVHD, the relative risks (RR) of incidence for chronic GVHD and overall GVHD were not significant for the RCTs, and these were 1.11 (RR) [(95% CI: 1.00, 1.22); I²=43%] and 1.10 (RR) [(95% CI: 1.03, 1.18); I²=48%], respectively for NRSs. There was no difference in the incidence of GVHD (acute or chronic) in both arms. No significant difference was found between the two arms for the outcomes of PE, HS, and OS. For NE, there was a marginal benefit of around one day with the use of G-CSF. The use of G-CSF did not alter time to PE, the incidence of GVHD, HS, and OS in both arms.

Eltrombopag for enhancement of platelet engraftment in patients undergoing allogeneic cord blood transplantation

Platelet recovery after allogeneic umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation is delayed compared to other graft sources. We conducted a multicenter phase 2a study to explore whether eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, would enhance platelet recovery after UCB transplantation. Between 02/2013 and 07/2016, 12 (10 adults, 2 children) individuals (median age 50; range 6-74 years) with hematological malignancies in complete remission were enrolled. Eltrombopag was given for a median of 76 (range 15-175) days and was safe even at doses of 300 mg/day. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 23 (range 16-40) days. Median time to platelets >20,000/µl and >50,000/µl was 55 (range 25-199) and 66 (range 31-230) days, respectively. A historical cohort comparison did not reveal an advantage for eltrombopag. In conclusion, in the present study eltrombopag seems safe. Based on our limited data, it seems unlikely that eltrombopag could enhance platelet engraftment after UCB transplantation.

Immature platelet fraction as a predictor of platelet count recovery following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

The immature platelet fraction (IPF) is a marker of increased platelet production. An increase in IPF is associated with increased marrow production; therefore, a subsequent increase in a bone marrow transplant recipient during the pancytopenic phase may correlate with platelet recovery and engraftment. We performed a retrospective cohort study and evaluated 32 patients who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Patients had platelet count, neutrophil count, platelet transfusion and IPF recorded over a period extending from stem cell infusion, day 0, to day 30. The outcomes analysed were platelet count versus time and IPF versus time to establish the predictive ability of the IPF to determine platelet count recovery. Further analysis was performed to confirm the strength of the correlation and the sensitivity of the IPF in predicting a platelet count greater than 50 at day 30. The IPF was shown to rise 5 days prior to platelet count increase. An IPF rise was also shown to correlate with higher average platelet counts at day 30 of transplant. The utility of the IPF in predicting a platelet count of over 50 at day 30 was strongest between days 11 and 15 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. An IPF of 2.0 or above had 69% sensitivity and 85% specificity for predicting a platelet count of greater than 50 by day 30. In allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, the IPF is a reliable predictor of platelet recovery. The mean IPF between day 11 and day 15 is the most sensitive in predicting a robust platelet count of greater than 50 by day 30.

Pre-infusion single-dose mesenchymal stem cells promote platelet engraftment and decrease severe acute graft versus host disease without relapse in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be used to treat steroid-refractory graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, the effects of MSCs in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) have not been confirmed in randomized studies.

Methods

We conducted a randomized clinical study to investigate the effects of pre-infusion (1 × 10⁶ cells/kg) MSCs on hematopoietic recovery, Epstein–Barr and cytomegalovirus infection, GVHD, and relapse in patients undergoing haplo-PBSCT. Fifty patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were randomly divided into an MSC group administered 1 × 10⁶ MSCs/kg 4 to 6 hours before infusion of peripheral stem cells and a control group without MSCs.

Results

Mean platelet engraftment time was significantly faster in the MSC compared with the control group (12.28 vs 13.29 days). The mean neutrophil engraftment time was comparable in both groups (10.76 ± 2.40 vs. 10.29 ± 1.72 days). Grade II or above acute GVHD was significantly decreased in the MSC compared with the control group (12% vs. 36%). There were no significant differences in relapse rate or overall survival between the groups.

Conclusion

These results suggest that pre-infusion single-dose MSCs promote platelet engraftment and decrease severe acute GVHD without increasing relapse rate.

Hepatitis B virus among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Antiviral impact in seroconversion, engraftment, and mortality in a Latin American center

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a worldwide concern with a broad distribution. In immunosuppressed populations, such as solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, it can reactivate leading to acute hepatic failure. Different risk factors are known for higher rates of reactivation, and entecavir, tenofovir, and lamivudine are often used for prophylaxis and treatment. However, data regarding the impact of antiviral drugs in neutrophil and platelet engraftment are still unknown and concern the management of viral hepatitis post-HSCT.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study reviewing medical records of patients referred for hematopoietic stem cell transplant from 2010 to 2017, which were also HBV infected, aiming to describe outcomes related to antiviral treatment and also the impact on platelet and neutrophil recovery after transplant. A secondary goal consisted of analyzing the impact of HBV infection in early and late mortality post-HSCT. The study included patients with positive blood bank screening for hepatitis B infection (HBsAg, Anti-HBc or HBV-NAT), confirmed later on by a laboratory routine serology.

RESULTS

A total of 1132 hematopoietic stem cell recipients were assessed between 2010 and 2017. Eighty-six patients were confirmed to have HBV infection, of which six were HBsAg-positive, 20 were isolated anti-HBc-positive, and 60 had resolved infection (anti-HBc-positive and anti-HBs-positive). With regard to prophylaxis, 19 patients underwent HSCT on HBV antiviral therapy or prophylaxis: two were HBeAg-positive, three were HBeAg-negative and HBV-DNA was only detectable in three of them. Moreover, one patient had an occult HBV infection. Regarding therapy, 9 patients were on entecavir, 6 patients on lamivudine, two on tenofovir, and two of them on a combination of tenofovir + lamivudine due to HIV co-infection. Reverse seroconversion was not identified in any patients receiving antiviral therapy or prophylaxis, but it was detected in one patient with occult hepatitis B and another with resolved infection. No severe side effects led to therapy discontinuation in the treated group, which also did not have any significant delay in neutrophil or platelet engraftment when compared to patients without antiviral therapy. In addition, the only factors associated with increased mortality were transplant onset after 50 years, allogeneic transplant and myeloablative conditioning regimens. Interestingly, the presence of HBsAg or detectable HBV-DNA was not related to worse outcomes, neither the use of rituximab. In multivariate analysis, the use of antiviral therapy, the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease or CMV reactivation also was not linked to increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

To sum up, HBV serology, ALT, and HBV-DNA monitoring are essential to detect hepatic flares earlier, even in populations with chronic inactive hepatitis, due to the possibility of later seroconversion. HBV infection was not related to increased 2-year mortality post-transplant. Antiviral prophylaxis did not cause any important clinical or laboratory side effects that could demand discontinuation, and its use was not associated with later neutrophil and platelet engraftments.

Impact of preexisting diabetes mellitus on transplantation outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

New onset diabetes mellitus is frequently observed following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is associated with adverse transplantation outcomes. However, the outcomes of patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus undergoing HSCT are largely unknown. We aimed to explore the impact of preexisting diabetes on transplantation outcomes in HSCT. In a retrospective study, medical charts of 34 HSCT recipients with diabetes mellitus undergoing allogeneic or autologous transplantation were reviewed and compared with 71 HSCT recipients without diabetes. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included hematopoietic recovery, length of hospital stay, febrile neutropenia, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), primary disease recurrence, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). On univariate analysis, there was no difference in transplantation outcomes in recipients with diabetes compared with recipients without diabetes. However, after adjusting for potential covariates, multivariate analysis demonstrated that having diabetes before HSCT significantly predicted outcome and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.97, p value: 0.04). This study suggests that patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing allogeneic or autologous HSCT may have inferior survival rates and warrant further attention.

Phenotypic and functional comparison of mobilized peripheral blood versus umbilical cord blood megakaryocyte populations

BACKGROUND AIMS

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) products results in rapid platelet engraftment, whereas the use of cord blood (CB) shows significant delays. The difference in the quality and number of megakaryocyte (MK) progenitors that may be responsible for the delay in platelet engraftment has not been fully defined. The objective of this study was to quantify the cells of the MK lineage in PBPC and CB products to determine whether potential differences exist.

METHODS

We examined PBPC or CB for differences in surface markers and subpopulations as well as polyploidization status within the MK lineage. Colony-forming assays were used to determine whether differences exist in the clonogenic MK progenitor cell. Finally, we transplanted PBPC and CB mononuclear cells into NOD/SCID/IL2Rγ-/- (NSG) mice to study platelet engraftment rates.

RESULTS

Equivalent MK populations and polyploidization was observed in PBPCs and CB. MK progenitors were present only in CD34+ cells and had little difference in colony growth between PBPC and CB. Additionally, MK subpopulations were similar in either product with a slightly more progenitor-enriched phenotype in CB. Finally, when PBPC or CB was transplanted at similar doses, equivalent platelet engraftment rates were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PBPC and CB contain similar frequencies of MK populations, and, when transplanted in comparable doses, CB is as effective as PBPCs in producing platelet engraftment in vivo. Understanding the differences in MK populations between PBPC and CB could help generate protocols to improve platelet engraftment after CB transplantation.