Development and Evaluation of the Dietary Pattern Calculator (DiPaC) for Personalized Assessment and Feedback

This study aimed to develop and validate a diet assessment screener - the Dietary Pattern Calculator (DiPaC). A scoping review identified currently available short diet quality assessment tools. Twenty-one articles covering 19 unique tools were included. The current tools mainly focused on individual nutrients or food groups or were developed for a specific population, and few ascertained overall dietary patterns. The 24-hour dietary recalls from the nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)-Nutrition 2015 (n = 13,958) were used to derive and validate a personalized dietary pattern informed by the scoping review using weighted partial least squares. The dominant dietary pattern in CCHS-Nutrition 2015 was characterized by high consumption of fast foods, carbonated drinks, and salty snacks and low consumption of whole fruits, orange vegetables, other vegetables and juices, whole grains, dark green vegetables, legumes, and soy. The dietary pattern assessment was used to create and evaluate DiPaC following an agile and user-centred research and development approach. DiPaC, which demonstrated high validity and intermediate reliability (internal consistency = 0.47-0.51), is publicly available at https://www.projectbiglife.ca/. DiPaC can be used by the public, clinicians, and researchers for quick and robust assessment of diet quality, providing immediate feedback with the advantage of being easy to implement.

Evaluating the performance of the Framingham Diabetes Risk Scoring Model in Canadian electronic medical records

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Framingham Diabetes Risk Scoring Model (FDRSM) in a Canadian population, using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) database.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of 571 631 patients, between the ages of 45 and 64, between 2002 and 2005, by extracting the most recent laboratory and examination results, including age, sex, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides and blood pressure. We calculated the risk scores of these patients based on the FDRSM. We tracked these patients for 8 years to find out whether or not they were diagnosed with diabetes. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AROC) to estimate the discrimination capability of the FDRSM on our study sample and compared it with the AROC reported in the original Framingham diabetes study.

RESULTS

The AROC for our main research sample of 1970 patients for whom all risk factors and follow-up data were available was 78.6% compared to the AROC of 85% reported in the FDRSM. We found that 70.1% of our main sample had risks lower than 3%; 16.3% had risks between 3% and 10%; and 13.6% had risks greater than 10% for diabetes over the following 8-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrimination capability of the FDRSM Canadian electronic medical records is fair. However, building a more accurate model for predicting diabetes based on the characteristics of Canadian patients is highly recommended.