Open vs Percutaneous Pedicle Instrumentation for Kyphosis Correction in Traumatic Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous pedicle instrumentation (PPI) has been used for the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar (TL) trauma. However, the ability of PPI to correct significant post-traumatic kyphosis requires further investigation. The objective of this study is to compare the amount of kyphosis correction achieved by PPI vs the traditional open posterior approach in patients presenting with significant kyphotic deformity following traumatic thoracic and TL spine injuries.

METHODS

Following Institutional Review Board approval, patients who underwent surgery for thoracic (T1-T9) or TL (T10-L2) fractures with at least 15° of focal kyphosis in a 5-year period were included in this study. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on surgical technique: traditional open posterior approach and minimally invasive PPI. Kyphosis correction was measured using Cobb angle 1 vertebrae above and 1 below the level of injury on sagittal preoperative computed tomography image, immediate and follow-up postoperative upright lateral radiographs. Initial degree of correction and loss of correction at the final follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

Of 91 patients included, 65 (71%) underwent open surgery and 26 (29%) underwent PPI. Open patients had 11° (95% CI, 9°-13°) of immediate correction compared with 11° (95% CI, 6°-15°) for PPI (P = 0.81). Follow-up data were available for 70 patients with a median of 105.5 days. Both groups had 1° (95% CI, 0°-2°) of loss of correction at follow-up (P = 0.82). Regardless of surgical technique, obesity (>30 kg/m²) and AO type-A compression fractures had significantly less correction. For each unit of body mass index, there was a 0.75° decrease in correction achieved (P < 0.0001). Other factors did not influence the degree of correction.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI techniques provide equivalent postoperative angular correction and maintenance of correction compared with open surgery in thoracic and TL trauma patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence for spine surgeons to utilize either technique for treating significant traumatic kyphotic deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic 3.

Digital Technologies in the Surgical Treatment of Post-Traumatic Zygomatico-Orbital Deformities

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of using digital technologies in patients with post-traumatic deformities of the zygomatico-orbital complex (ZOC) by comparing the results with the conventional methods of surgical treatment.

Unfavourable outcomes in maxillofacial injuries: How to avoid and manage

Faciomaxillary injuries remain one of the common injuries managed by plastic surgeons. The goal of treatment in these injuries is the three-dimensional restoration of the disturbed anatomy so as to achieve pre-injury form and function. In this article, the authors review the anatomic, diagnostic and management considerations to optimise results and minimise the late post-traumatic deformities. Most of the adverse outcomes are usually a result of poorly addressed underlying structural injury during the primary management. An accurate physical examination combined with detailed computed tomographic scanning of the craniofacial skeleton is required to generate an appropriate treatment plan. This organised approach has proven effective in restoring the injured structures to pre-injury status. Multiple clinical cases are used to illustrate the different fracture patterns along with various surgical techniques to achieve an acceptable outcome. Early diagnosis and timely management of complications in these complex injuries is also discussed.