Left Ventricular Structure is Associated with Postoperative Death After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background

The relationship between abnormal left ventricular (LV) structure and adverse outcomes has been confirmed in diverse patient groups in previous studies. However, it remains uncertain whether LV structure has predictive implications in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled patients who had HFrEF and underwent CABG between January 2013 and July 2019. According to LV hypertrophy (LVH) and LV enlargement (LVE) assessed by echocardiography, patients were classified into four LV structure types: (-)LVH/(-)LVE, (+)LVH/(-)LVE, (-)LVH/(+)LVE, and (+)LVH/(+)LVE.

Results

A total of 435 consecutive patients (mean age: 59.4 ± 9.6 years; 14.9% female) were enrolled in the present study. Examined independently, either LVH (p < 0.001) or LVE (p < 0.001) was independently associated with postoperative mortality in multivariate analysis. When LVH and LVE were analyzed in combination, the risk of mortality after CABG was lowest in (-)LVH/(-)LVE and increased with (+)LVH/(-)LVE (odds ratio [OR]: 7.525; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.827–30.679, p = 0.004), (-)LVH/(+)LVE (OR: 7.253; 95% CI: 1.950–27.185, p = 0.003), and (+)LVH/(+)LVE (OR: 9.547; 95% CI: 2.726–34.805, p < 0.001), independent of other risk factors. Adding LV structural types to the baseline model gained an incremental effect on the predictive value for postoperative mortality (AUC: baseline model, 0.838 vs baseline model + LV structural types, 0.901, p for comparison = 0.010; category‐free net reclassification improvement (NRI): 0.764, p < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement (IDI): 0.061, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

LVH and LVE were associated with an increased risk of postoperative mortality after CABG in patients with HFrEF. Categorizing LV structural patterns with LVH and LVE contributes to risk stratification and provides incremental predictive ability. Routine echocardiographic assessment of LVH and LVE is needed in clinical practice.

Effect of electroencephalogram-guided anaesthesia administration on 1 yr mortality: 1 yr follow-up of a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative EEG suppression duration has been associated with postoperative delirium and mortality. In a clinical trial testing anaesthesia titration to avoid EEG suppression, the intervention did not decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium, but was associated with reduced 30 day mortality. The present study evaluated whether the EEG-guided anaesthesia intervention continued to be associated with reduced 1 yr mortality.

METHODS

This manuscript reports 1 yr follow-up of patients from a single-centre RCT, including a post-hoc secondary outcome (1 yr mortality) in addition to pre-specified secondary outcomes. The trial included patients aged 60 yr or older undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia between January 2015 and May 2018. Patients were randomised to receive EEG-guided anaesthesia or usual care. The previously reported primary outcome was postoperative delirium. The outcome of the current study was all-cause 1 yr mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1232 patients enrolled, 614 patients were randomised to EEG-guided anaesthesia and 618 patients to usual care. One year mortality was 57/591 (9.6%) in the guided group and 62/601 (10.3%) in the usual-care group. No significant difference in mortality was observed (adjusted absolute risk difference, -0.7%; 99.5% confidence interval, -5.8% to 4.3%; P=0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

An EEG-guided anaesthesia intervention aiming to decrease duration of EEG suppression during surgery did not significantly decrease 1 yr mortality. These findings, in the context of other studies, do not provide supportive evidence for EEG-guided anaesthesia to prevent intermediate term postoperative death.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02241655.

Early Postoperative Death in Patients Undergoing Emergency High-Risk Surgery: Towards a Better Understanding of Patients for Whom Surgery May Not Be Beneficial

The timing, causes, and quality of care for patients who die after emergency laparotomy have not been extensively reported. A large database of 13,953 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, between July 2014 and March 2017, from 28 hospitals in England was studied. Anonymized data was extracted on day of death, patient demographics, operative details, compliance with standards of care, and 30-day and in-patient mortality. Thirty-day mortality was 8.9%, and overall inpatient mortality was 9.8%. Almost 40% of postoperative deaths occurred within three days of surgery, and 70% of these early deaths occurred on the day of surgery or the first postoperative day. Such early deaths could be considered nonbeneficial surgery. Patients who died within three days of surgery had a significantly higher preoperative lactate, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) grade, and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM). Compliance with perioperative standards of care based on the Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative care bundle was high overall and better for those patients who died within three days of surgery. Multidisciplinary team involvement from intensive care, care of the elderly physicians, and palliative care may help both the communication and the burden of responsibility in deciding on the risk–benefit of operative versus nonoperative approaches to care.