The Effect of Stroboscopic Vision Training on Blind-folded Straight-line Walking

Stroboscopic vision training has shown to improve visual-motor control and dynamic visual acuity in sport performance; however, no studies have considered using this training to enhance kinesthetic awareness during walking, applicable to high fall-risk populations.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of stroboscopic vision training on blind-folded straight-line walking.

Methods

Thirty-seven college-aged healthy participants (age: 20.14 ± 1.23 years; females: N = 32, males: N = 5) completed this study. In this pre-posttest quasi-experimental investigation, participants with no epileptic or balance disorder history completed a four-week progressive stroboscopic vision training protocol. To assess sensorimotor feedback participants were instructed to walk a 27.5 m straight line while blindfolded. PRE and POST blind-folded straight line walk tests were completed and deviations from endpoint were measured. A paired-samples t-test was used to analyze the calculated deviation angles.

Results

Significant difference was noted from PRE (14.48 ± 5.95) to POST (11.60 ± 6.78) deviation angles (t(36) = 2.71, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

This is the first study to examine the effects of stroboscopic training on a vision restricted walking task, which demands feedback re-weighting. These findings may be valuable for clinical settings or performance where reliance on non-visual systems may be beneficial.

Postural mechanisms to control body displacements in the performance of lateral gaze shifts

Medialateral postural control mechanisms (bodyweight distribution and center of pressure location) have been studied in static conditions. Our objective was to determine how these mechanisms are adjusted to perform voluntary movements, in our case 80° lateral gaze shifts at 0.125 Hz and 0.25 Hz. In healthy, young adults, we expected body marker (neck, lower back) and center of pressure displacements to be significantly greater in gaze shift conditions than in the stationary gaze condition. To explain these changes in center of pressure displacement, the amplitude contribution of both mechanisms was expected to increase significantly. All these results were found accordingly. Unexpectedly, the active contribution of the bodyweight distribution mechanism was negatively related to body marker displacements in the gaze shift conditions (ns in stationary condition). Moreover, changes in the contribution of the mechanisms were statistically weaker in effect size than changes in body displacement. However, the participants were not unstable because they performed the visual tasks as requested. We propose that the strength of medialateral postural control mechanisms may not only be strengthened to control challenging ML stance conditions but also slightly weakened to allow the performance of adequate body motions in ongoing tasks.