1
|
Saadi A, Bedoui MA, Zaghbib S, Boussaffa H, Mokaddem S, Nacef IB, Ayed H, Derouiche A, Khiari K, Chakroun M, Ben Slama R. Predictors of successful outcome after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1205988. [PMID: 37635962 PMCID: PMC10454906 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1205988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) is the most frequent surgically curable form of endocrine hypertension. Adrenalectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for UPA, but outcomes after surgery are variable. The cause of resistant hypertension after surgery is still a matter of debate. Our aim was to investigate cure rates after surgery and to evaluate preoperative factors that might influence the surgical outcome. Methods Between 2000 and 2021, the charts of 71 Tunisian patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for UPA were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative medical records were collected and follow-up data (1-158 months) were registered. Antihypertensive medication doses were calculated using defined daily doses (DDD) and postoperative outcomes were assessed using the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criterion. Results Of 91 enrolled patients, 71 (59% women, mean age 46 years, median length of follow-up 21 months) were suitable for evaluation. Thirty-four patients (48%) had complete clinical success according to the PASO criteria. The most relevant factors associated with complete clinical success on univariate analysis were: absence of diabetes (p= 0.007), low body mass index (BMI) (p= 0.001), lower preoperative DDD (p= 0.01), preoperatively controlled blood pressure (p= 0.024), higher plasma aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) (p= 0.001), adenoma subtyping (p <0.001) and aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) (p= 0.002). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the major predictors of complete clinical success were absence of diabetes (OR: 5.205), a BMI < 30 (OR: 4.930), a plasma ARR > 332 (OR: 4.554) and an ARS ≥ 3 (OR: 2.056). Conclusion Complete and partial clinical response rates were achieved in respectively 48 and 43% of cases. The main predictors of complete resolution of hypertension were absence of diabetes, low BMI, high plasma ARR and high ARS. Taking these factors into account may help identify patients at risk of persistent postoperative hypertension who may require long-term surveillance and medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Saadi
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Ali Bedoui
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Selim Zaghbib
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Hamza Boussaffa
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Seif Mokaddem
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Ibtissem Ben Nacef
- Department of Endocrinology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Haroun Ayed
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Amine Derouiche
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Karima Khiari
- Department of Endocrinology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Marouene Chakroun
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Riadh Ben Slama
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Toole SM, Hornby C, Sze WCC, Hannon MJ, Akker SA, Druce MR, Waterhouse M, Dawnay A, Sahdev A, Matson M, Parvanta L, Drake WM. Performance evaluation of scoring systems for predicting post-operative hypertension cure in primary aldosteronism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2021; 95:576-586. [PMID: 34042196 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hypertension cure following adrenalectomy in unilateral primary aldosteronism is not guaranteed. Its likelihood is associated with pre-operative parameters, which have been variably combined in six different predictive scoring systems. The relative performance of these systems is currently unknown. The objective of this work was to identify the best performing scoring system for predicting hypertension cure following adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism. DESIGN Retrospective analysis in a single tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS Eighty-seven adult patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism who had undergone adrenalectomy between 2004 and 2018 for whom complete data sets were available to calculate all scoring systems. MEASUREMENTS Prediction of hypertension cure by each of the six scoring systems. RESULTS Hypertension cure was achieved in 36/87 (41.4%) patients within the first post-operative year, which fell to 18/71 (25.4%) patients at final follow-up (median 53 months, P = .002). Analysis of receiver operating characteristic area under the curves for the different scoring systems identified a difference in performance at early, but not late, follow-up. For all systems, the area under the curve was lower at early compared with late follow-up and compared to performance in the cohorts in which they were originally defined. CONCLUSIONS No single scoring system performed significantly better than all others when applied in our cohort, although two did display particular advantages. It remains to be determined how best such scoring systems can be incorporated into the routine clinical care of patients with PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Matthew O'Toole
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
- The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Hornby
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Mark John Hannon
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Bantry General Hospital, Bantry, Cork, Ireland
| | - Scott Alexander Akker
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
- The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Maralyn Rose Druce
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
- The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mona Waterhouse
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anne Dawnay
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Anju Sahdev
- Department of Radiology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Matson
- Department of Radiology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Laila Parvanta
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - William Martyn Drake
- Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
- The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Li M, Deng H, Pang Y, Liu L, Guan X. The systems of metastatic potential prediction in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:769-780. [PMID: 32266090 PMCID: PMC7136918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors that arising from the adrenal medulla or extra-adrenal autonomic ganglia. Traditionally, PPGL was classified as benign or malignant based on the presence of distant metastasis at the time of initial surgery. However, according to WHO 2017 Classification of Tumors of Endocrine Organs, all PPGL has metastatic potential. The term "metastatic" is used, replacing "malignant" in this group of tumors. The prediction of PPGL's metastatic potential is a clinical concern, although many relevant indicators such as genetics, histology, pathology and molecular biology markers have been proved to be related to the metastasis of PPGL, but none of them is 100% predictive; various types of prediction systems had been created, but previous studies had demonstrated that they still need to be validated in multicenter studies. There is no unified clinical standard to differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic and a highly effective prediction system is of urgent need. In this review, we summarized all reported prediction systems, including the PASS system, the GAPP system, the COPPs system and the ASES system. Additional potential indicators that related to metastatic PPGL were also introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Wang
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNO. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
| | - Minghao Li
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNO. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
| | - Hao Deng
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNO. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
| | - Yingxian Pang
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNO. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
| | - Longfei Liu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNO. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNo. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
| | - Xiao Guan
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNO. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNo. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|