Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially dangerous condition that occurs when an embryo implants and develops within the scar tissue from a previous cesarean section. Treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy depends on several factors, including the gestational age of the pregnancy, the presence of complications, and the individual patient's circumstances. We performed a systematic review of the published literature on management of cesarean scar pregnancy and the outcomes, complications, and effects on fertility. A systematic review of recent scientific literature published up to April 2023 in the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We used the search keywords "cesarean scar pregnancy," "methotrexate," "systemic," "chemoembolization," and "uterine artery embolization." The baseline search resulted in 413 articles. After the exclusion of 342 irrelevant articles, the abstracts and titles of the remaining 71 articles were read for potential inclusion, resulting in exclusion of a further 16 articles. Therefore, the full texts of 55 articles were investigated. Finally, 42 papers were included in the study. The main finding was that chemoembolization is more successful than systemic methotrexate therapy, and is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Transarterial chemoembolization appears to be safe and effective method of treatment in patients with CSP and should thus be considered during multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility

BACKGROUND

Starting over 40 years ago, in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has become the cornerstone for fertility treatment. Since then, in 1992, Palermo and colleagues successfully applied the technique intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to benefit couples where conventional in vitro fertilisation (c-IVF) and sub-zonal insemination (SUZI) proved unsuccessful. After this case report, ICSI has become the treatment of choice for couples with severe male factor subfertility. Over time, ICSI has been used in the treatment of couples with mild male and even unexplained infertility. This review is an update of the review, first published in 1999, comparing ICSI with c-IVF for couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICSI relative to c-IVF in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases and trial registers: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase (excerpta Medica Database), MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) and PsycINFO (Psychological literature database) for articles between January 2010 and 22 February 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ICSI with c-IVF in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodical procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live birth and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, viable intrauterine pregnancy and miscarriage.

MAIN RESULTS

The original review published in 2003 included one RCT. In this 2023 update, we identified an additional two RCTs totalling a cohort of 1539 couples, comparing ICSI with c-IVF techniques. Two studies reported on live birth. Using the GRADE method, we assessed the certainty of evidence and reported evidence as low-certainty for live birth. We are uncertain of the effect of ICSI versus c-IVF for live birth rates (risk ratio (RR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI 0.94 to 1.30, I2 = 0%, 2 studies, n = 1124, low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following c-IVF is assumed to be 32%, the chance of live birth with ICSI would be between 30% and 41%. For adverse events; multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, pre-eclampsia and prematurity, there was probably little or no difference between the two techniques. No study reported the primary outcome stillbirth. For secondary outcomes, we are uncertain of the effect of ICSI versus c-IVF for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13, I2 = 45%, 3 studies, n = 1539, low-certainty evidence). Comparison of viable intrauterine pregnancy rates showed probably little or no difference between ICSI and c-IVF (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.16, I2=75%, 2 studies, n = 1479 couples, moderate-certainty evidence). The high heterogeneity may have been caused by one older study conducted when protocols were less rigorous. The evidence suggests that if the chance of viable intrauterine pregnancy following c-IVF is assumed to be 33%, the chance of viable intrauterine pregnancy with ICSI would be between 28% and 38%. Miscarriage rates also showed probably little or no difference between the two techniques.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current available studies that compare ICSI and c-IVF in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility, show neither method was superior to the other, in achieving live birth, adverse events (multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, pre-eclampsia and prematurity), also alongside secondary outcomes, clinical pregnancy, viable intrauterine pregnancy or miscarriage.

Conservative Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND Tubal heterotopic pregnancy is an extremely rare complication of pregnancy, in which there is a simultaneous presence of a pregnancy in the uterine cavity and in an ectopic location, most commonly in the fallopian tube. The management of such cases is not clearly established. In the case of a desire to maintain an intrauterine pregnancy, the surgical procedure consisting of a salpingectomy or salpingostomy is the most common. Such a procedure is effective, but it involves potential complications typical of surgeries, so, in some cases, it seems reasonable to apply the expectant management. CASE REPORT A 31-year-old woman was admitted to the clinic due to pain in the right lower abdomen. An ultrasound examination revealed a gestational sac in the uterine cavity corresponding to 5 weeks of pregnancy with a yolk sac. A twin sac was found in the right fallopian tube. Due to the patient's mild symptoms, absence of bleeding into the peritoneal cavity, concerns about the safety of the embryo and the pregnant woman in case of surgery, conservative management was decided. On the 20th day, the patient was discharged from the clinic with a viable intrauterine pregnancy and a partially absorbed ectopic pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS In the case of an ectopic tubal pregnancy, if there are no symptoms of bleeding into the peritoneal cavity, it is possible to adopt a safe conservative approach with strict patient observation.

Delays to Surgery in Emergency Department Cases of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVE

Create a process map for emergency department (ED) presentations of surgical ectopic pregnancy, and identify areas of management amenable to quality improvement.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing surgical management of ectopic pregnancy at a large, urban, academic tertiary care centre from 2015 to 2017 was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included. There were 6 (8.2%) unstable A cases (recommended time to operating room [OR] 0-2 hours), 23 (31.5%) stable A cases, and 44 (60%) B cases (recommended time to OR 2-8 hours). The percent of patients who were in the OR within the recommended time window were 6 (100%) for unstable A cases, 13 (56%) stable A cases, and 29 (65.9%) stable B cases, respectively (P = 0.139). Notable time delays include the time from gynaecology referral to the time seen by gynaecology (29.7% of total wait time for stable A cases from ED to OR) and the time the OR was booked to the time the patient was brought to the OR (53.2% of total wait time for stable B cases). Of the patients seen by physician at the emergency department first, the time from triage to the OR was significantly shorter for patients that received bedside ultrasound only (0.67 ± 0.5 hours vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 hours [P = 0.007]).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to map the ED presentation of surgical ectopic pregnancy. The management of ectopic pregnancy would benefit from the development of surgical triage decision aids, a surgical care pathway, and increased use of screening bedside ultrasound.

Impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on ectopic pregnancy management in the United Kingdom: a multicentre observational study

Objective

To describe the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on the management of women with ectopic pregnancy.

Design

A multicentre observational study comparing outcomes from a prospective cohort during the pandemic [COVID‐19‐ectopic pregnancy registry (CEPR)] compared with a historical pre‐pandemic cohort [non‐COVID‐19‐ectopic pregnancy registry (NCEPR)].

Setting

Five London university hospitals.

Population and methods

Consecutive patients diagnosed clinically and/or radiologically with ectopic pregnancy (March 2020–August 2020) were entered into the CEPR and results were compared with the NCEPR cohort (January 2019–June 2019). An adjusted analysis was performed for potentially confounding variables.

Main outcome measures

Patient demographics, management (expectant, medical and surgical), length of treatment, number of hospital visits (non‐surgical management), length of stay (surgical management) and 30‐day complications.

Results

Three hundred and forty‐one women met the inclusion criteria: 162 CEPR and 179 NCEPR. A significantly lower percentage of women underwent surgical management versus non‐surgical management in the CEPR versus NCEPR (58.6%; 95/162 versus 72.6%; 130/179; P = 0.007). Among patients managed with expectant management, the CEPR had a significantly lower mean number of hospital visits compared with NCEPR (3.0, interquartile range [IQR] [3, 5] versus 9.0, [5, 14]; P = <0.001). Among patients managed with medical management, the CEPR had a significantly lower median number of hospital visits versus NCEPR (6.0, [5, 8] versus 9, [6, 10]; P = 0.003). There was no observed difference in complication rates between cohorts.

Conclusion

Women were found to undergo significantly higher rates of non‐surgical management during the COVID‐19 first wave compared with a pre‐pandemic cohort. Women managed non‐surgically in the CPER cohort were also managed with fewer hospital attendances. This did not lead to an increase in observed complication rates.

Tweetable abstract

A higher rate of non‐surgical management of ectopic pregnancy during the COVID‐19 pandemic did not increase complication rates.

A higher rate of non‐surgical management of ectopic pregnancy during the COVID‐19 pandemic did not increase complication rates.

Guideline No. 414: Management of Pregnancy of Unknown Location and Tubal and Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To provide an evidence-based algorithm to guide the diagnosis and management of pregnancy of unknown location and tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancy.

TARGET POPULATION

All patients of reproductive age.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The implementation of this guideline aims to benefit patients with positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin results and provide physicians with a standard algorithm for expectant, medical, and surgical treatment of pregnancy of unknown location and tubal pregnancy and nontubal ectopic pregnancies.

EVIDENCE

The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline and Cochrane in 2018: cesarean section, chorionic gonadotropin, beta subunit, human/blood, fallopian tubes/surgery, female, fertility, humans, infertility, laparoscopy, methotrexate, methotrexate/administration & dosage, methotrexate/therapeutic use, pregnancy (abdominal, angular, cervix, cornual, ectopic, ectopic/diagnosis, ectopic/diagnostic imaging, ectopic/drug therapy, ectopic/epidemiology, ectopic/mortality, ectopic/surgery, heterotopic, interstitial, isthmo-cervical, ovarian, tubal, unknown location), recurrence, risk factors, salpingectomy, salpingostomy, tubal pregnancy, ultrasonography, doppler ultrasonography, and prenatal. Articles included were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Only English-language articles were reviewed.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetrician-gynaecologists, family physicians, emergency physicians, midwives, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, and residents and fellows.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES)

RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Ectopic pregnancy in left ovary and contralateral uterine tube diagnosed one week apart in In Vitro Fertilization with donor eggs: Case report

Bilateral ectopic pregnancy is a rare clinical condition with an estimated prevalence of 1/200 000 in spontaneous pregnancies. Studies have found that In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is related to ectopic pregnancy independently, but the incidence of tubal disease in the donor egg recipient population is thought to be significantly lower than in the standard IVF population. We report the case of a patient participating in the egg-sharing program, who was diagnosed with ovarian ectopic pregnancy, treated with surgery. After one week, she was diagnosed with tubal ectopic pregnancy in the contralateral tube. The clinician should be aware that the treatment of one ectopic pregnancy does not preclude the occurrence of a second ectopic pregnancy in the same patient and should pay attention to the intra-operatory inspection of both side fallopian tubes in any ectopic pregnancy case. Routine ultrasound after ectopic pregnancy treatment may be reasonable, especially in high risk patients.

Video laparoscopic intervention for an interstitial pregnancy after failure of clinical treatment

CONTEXT

Interstitial pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy for which the best therapeutic course of action has yet to be determined. Surgical intervention entails a high risk of hemorrhage due to the great vascularization of the cornual region of the uterus. Case descriptions facilitate the analysis of results and aid clinicians in determining the most appropriate course of action in these situations.

CASE REPORT

In a patient with an ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial pregnancy, clinical treatment using methotrexate was chosen. However, after one week, there was a marked decline in the serum level of the β subunit of chorionic gonadotropin hormone, although an ultrasound examination revealed embryonic cardiac activity. A second dose of the chemotherapy was administered. Embryonic cardiac activity persisted 48 hours later. Video laparoscopy was performed to achieve right-side cornual resection, which resulted in satisfactory resolution of the case.

Predictors of success of repeated injections of single-dose methotrexate regimen for tubal ectopic pregnancy

The purpose of this study is to evaluate predictors of success of repeated injections of methotrexate in the single-dose regimen for the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy. All patients who had ectopic tubal pregnancy and were treated with a single dose regimen were retrospectively identified. 126 patients were treated with methotrexate. Among them, 39 patients were adequate for this study. 33 were treated with the 2nd dose and 27 were successfully cured. Additionally, 6 who were injected with the 3rd dose were all cured as well. Therefore, in our study, the success rate for the repeated injections of methotrexate was found to be 84.6% (33/39). The mean initial beta-hCG level was significantly lower in patients who were successfully treated than in patients who failed (3915.3+/-3281.3 vs. 8379.7+/-2604.4 IU/mL, p<0.05). The success rate is 96% when the beta-hCG level is less than 6,000 IU/mL and is 58% when beta-hCG is greater than 6,000 IU/mL (OR=18.57, 95% CI 1.86-185.89). The initial beta-hCG level is the only factor that has significant meaning as predictor of success of repeated injections of methotrexate in the single-dose regimen. Repeated injections of methotrexate may be particularly effective when the initial beta-hCG level is below 6,000 IU/mL.

Clinical effectiveness of urinary human chorionic gonadotropin related protein (hCGRP) quantification for diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

We detected pregnancy related new molecule, human chorionic gonadotropin related protein (hCGRP) in the urine of a pregnant women by using a monoclonal antibody against the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This study examined the effectiveness of urinary hCGRP quantification in diagnosing ectopic pregnancy. This study included 40 normal pregnant women and 25 patients with ectopic pregnancy. Patients' serum and urinary intact whole hCG (i-hCG) and hCGRP concentrations were measured using sandwich ELISA and the ratio of hCGRP to i-hCG was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) 10.0. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the cut-off value to discriminate ectopic pregnancies from normal intrauterine pregnancies. Urinary hCGRP and hCGRP/i-hCG ratio in ectopic pregnancy group (14 +/- 6.6 ng/mL, 4.6 +/- 1.9%, respectively) were significantly lower than those of normal pregnancy group (149 +/- 10.2 ng/mL, 29.7 +/- 1.9%, respectively; p<0.001). Based on ROC curve analysis, a cut-off point of urinary hCGRP/i-hCG ratio <16.2% discriminated between ectopic pregnancy and normal pregnancy with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 92.0%, 90.0%, 32.6%, and 99.5%, respectively. Urinary hCGRP/i-hCG ratio measurement may be effective in diagnosing ectopic pregnancy.

Clinical outcomes of patients treated for cervical pregnancy with or without methotrexate

The objective of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of patients treated for cervical pregnancy with or without methotrexate (MTX) and to evaluate the effects of MTX in the treatment of cervical pregnancy. Between January 1993 and February 2000, 31 patients were diagnosed with cervical pregnancy. Twenty-two patients were treated with MTX chemotherapy and nine patients were treated with surgical procedures without MTX treatment. In the non-MTX treatment group, three patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, five required adjuvant procedures to control the bleeding during dilatation and curettage (D&C) and only one patient was treated with a simple D&C. In the MTX treatment group, fourteen (63.6%) patients were treated with only MTX and eight (36.4%) cases underwent concomitant procedures (simple curettage, curettage and Foley catheter tamponade, cervical cerclage, ligation of the descending branches of uterine arteries, or ligation of hypogastric arteries). The uterus was preserved in all cases and three women delivered healthy babies in their subsequent pregnancy. In conclusion, early diagnosis, appropriate MTX regimen in combination of necessary adjuvant conservative procedures could contribute to successful treatment with preservation of the uterus and future reproductive ability.