Examining Psychosocial and Economic Barriers to Green Space Access for Racialised Individuals and Families: A Narrative Literature Review of the Evidence to Date

BACKGROUND

Social prescribing (such as green social prescribing), aims to address health disparities cross-culturally to improve well-being. However, evidence highlights racial disparities in relation to access to quality green space (including local/national parks and recreational spaces). This review aimed to identify the psycho-socioeconomic barriers to green space access for racialised individuals/families and Black Indigenous People of Colour (BIPOC), to understand what cultural adaptations might be made to help support them to access green social prescribing within the UK.

METHOD

A narrative systematic review was conducted to identify barriers to green space access for racialised individuals/families and BIPOC. Searches of publication databases (APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [CDSR], Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], and SCOPUS Preview) were undertaken from January to February 2022, to identify quantitative peer reviewed studies. Of the 4493 abstracts identified, ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for final review.

RESULTS

The results suggest that interpersonal, practical (such as transportation costs, entrance fees and lodging costs) and environmental factors can act as barriers to green space access for racialised individuals/families. Most frequently reported barriers were perceptions of safety and costs associated with travel and accessing green spaces, particularly for families.

CONCLUSION

Factors such as diversity-friendly schemes (e.g., multiple languages on signs and additional prayer spaces in parks), funding and strategies to improve safety should be considered in the design and commissioning of green space and green social prescribing initiatives in primary care. By mitigating these barriers green space can become more accessible and improve inclusivity for racialised individuals/families. Future research could explore the inter-racial differences between racialised populations and which mechanisms reduce barriers to access and in what contexts.

Experiences of discrimination and its impacts on well-being among racialised LGBTQ+ newcomers living in Waterloo region, Ontario, Canada

Discrimination (i.e. racism, homo/bi/transphobia) at both the individual and systemic levels may negatively impact the well-being of racialised LGBTQ+ newcomers living in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada. Current research about the experiences of LGBTQ+ newcomers focuses predominantly on homogeneous samples of gay men living in large metropolitan city centres. The present study aims to extend the current literature by exploring the experiences of discrimination and its impacts on well-being among racialised LGBTQ+ newcomers living in a small urban area and representing a variety of intersecting identities (i.e. ethno-racial background, LGBTQ+ identity, newcomer status). Using a qualitative method, 10 individuals were invited to complete a semistructured interview between fall 2019 and summer 2020 about their experiences of discrimination in Waterloo Region, and how such experiences impact their well-being. Using an intersectional lens, a thematic analysis revealed that racialised LGBTQ+ newcomers experienced discrimination before and after settlement in Waterloo Region. Prior to settlement, participants spoke predominantly about experiences of homo/biphobia and the associated feelings of internalised oppression. Alternatively, upon settling in Waterloo Region, experiences of discrimination were predominantly racism, and, in particular, systemic racism, which manifested as an inability to access adequate services and a lack of representation in various spaces throughout Waterloo Region. These results extend previous research by identifying the service barriers experienced by racialised LGBTQ+ newcomers living in a small urban area and can be used to inform best practices for addressing these barriers in Waterloo Region and other small urban areas with similar demographics. Implications and limitations are discussed.