1
|
Mayayo-Peralta I, Debets DO, Prekovic S, Schuurman K, Beerthuijzen S, Almekinders M, Sanders J, Moelans CB, Saleiro S, Wesseling J, van Diest PJ, Henrique R, Jerónimo C, Altelaar M, Zwart W. Proteomics on malignant pleural effusions reveals ERα loss in metastatic breast cancer associates with SGK1-NDRG1 deregulation. Mol Oncol 2024; 18:156-169. [PMID: 37854018 PMCID: PMC10766196 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BCa) is a highly heterogeneous disease, with hormone receptor status being a key factor in patient prognostication and treatment decision-making. The majority of primary tumours are positive for oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα), which plays a key role in tumorigenesis and disease progression, and represents the major target for treatment of BCa. However, around one-third of patients with ERα-positive BCa relapse and progress into the metastatic stage, with 20% of metastatic cases characterised by loss of ERα expression after endocrine treatment, known as ERα-conversion. It remains unclear whether ERα-converted cancers are biologically similar to bona fide ERα-negative disease and which signalling cascades compensate for ERα loss and drive tumour progression. To better understand the biological changes that occur in metastatic BCa upon ERα loss, we performed (phospho)proteomics analysis of 47 malignant pleural effusions derived from 37 BCa patients, comparing ERα-positive, ERα-converted and ERα-negative cases. Our data revealed that the loss of ERα-dependency in this metastatic site leads to only a partial switch to an ERα-negative molecular phenotype, with preservation of a luminal-like proteomic landscape. Furthermore, we found evidence for decreased activity of several key kinases, including serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), in ERα-converted metastases. Loss of SGK1 substrate phosphorylation may compensate for the loss of ERα-dependency in advanced disease and exposes a potential therapeutic vulnerability that may be exploited in treating these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Mayayo-Peralta
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donna O Debets
- Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Prekovic
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karianne Schuurman
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Beerthuijzen
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Almekinders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy B Moelans
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Saleiro
- Lung Cancer Clinics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rui Henrique
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of the Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Portugal
| | - Carmen Jerónimo
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of the Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Portugal
| | - Maarten Altelaar
- Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin M, Jin Y, Lv H, Hu X, Zhang J. Incidence and prognostic significance of receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and paired bone metastases. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1476-1489. [PMID: 36408915 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
ER, PgR and HER-2 status are the cornerstones of choosing systemic therapy for breast cancer, but can change during the disease course. Guidelines recommended the biopsy of the metastatic tumor to reassess receptor status. Bone is the most frequent metastatic site of breast cancer but remained technically difficult to biopsy. Our study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and paired bone metastases. One hundred and fifty-five breast cancer patients were diagnosed with pathology-confirmed bone metastasis at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Ninety-three patients with receptor status available on both primary tumor and bone metastases were included in our study. ER, PgR and HER-2 status converted from positive to negative in 10.8% (10/93), 28.0% (26/93) and 8.6% (8/93) of the patients, while ER, PgR and HER-2 status converted from negative to positive in 3.2% (3/93), 4.3% (4/93) and 1.1% (1/93) of the patients, respectively. 40.4% (17/42) of the HER2-0 tumors converted to HER2-low, which enabled them to receive the treatment of new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Prior endocrine and anti-HER2 therapy were the independent risk factors for receptor conversion. Loss of HR expression in bone metastases was significantly associated with worse first-line PFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.271, P-value = .039) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 6.09, P-value = .011). In conclusion, our study confirmed that patients may experience receptor conversion between primary breast cancer and bone metastases, possibly influenced by prior treatments, which significantly influenced prognosis. The rebiopsy of bone metastases in patients with primary HER2-0 tumors may benefit from the new ADC drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxi Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yizi Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong Lv
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Djahansouzi S, Hanstein B, Rein D, Clees M, Rath W. The rate of estrogen receptor-conversion associated with tumor progression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients following adjuvant Tamoxifen administration. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1431. [PMID: 34086424 PMCID: PMC8789621 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hormone Receptor (HR)‐discordance between primary breast cancer and metastasis is a known biological phenomenon. Discordance studies usually comprise a heterogeneous group of HR‐positive and negative patients and allow for the comparison of changes in HR‐status from the primary to the recurrent disease. However, in a clinical setting, the rate of estrogen receptor‐conversion following endocrine therapy with agents such as Tamoxifen (TAM) in estrogen receptor‐positive cancers is of primary interest as opposed to total receptor discordance. Aim To investigate the rate of estrogen receptor‐conversion associated with tumor progression in estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer patients following adjuvant TAM administration and to compare the results with the meta‐analysis data of HR‐discordance studies. Methods and Results A retrospective double‐center review of biomarkers in 67 estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer patients who underwent TAM treatment in the adjuvant setting. The estrogen and progesterone receptor‐status were compared at the time of diagnosis and following relapse and the Disease‐free Survival, mean duration of TAM treatment as well as the operative, radiation, and cytotoxic therapies registered before TAM treatment, were recorded. Initially, all patients were estrogen receptor‐positive. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 52.8 ± 12.4 years. After recurrence, only 47 patients (70.1%) were still estrogen receptor‐positive with a highly significant loss of estrogen receptor‐expression in 29.9% of cases. The mean duration of TAM treatment was 40.7 ± 19.9 months. 45 patients (i.e., 67.2%) progressed during the TAM treatment and the remaining 22 patients (32.8%) developed relapse after the TAM treatment had finished. Initially, there were 82.1% progesterone receptor‐positive and 17.9% progesterone receptor‐negative, but after relapse the progesterone receptor‐positive cases diminished significantly to 53.7%, showing a progesterone receptor‐loss of 28.4%. Conclusion The rate of estrogen receptor‐loss associated with tumor progression following TAM treatment is approximately 30%, which is of clinical relevance in order to evaluate further endocrine efficacy in these patients. This rate of receptor conversion is roughly 6‐13% higher compared to the recently published meta‐analysis data of discordance studies. This discrepancy could possibly be due to anti‐hormonal therapy with TAM accentuating receptor conversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirus Djahansouzi
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rue Emile Mayrisch, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Bettina Hanstein
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Daniel Rein
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michel Clees
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rue Emile Mayrisch, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Werner Rath
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao W, Sun L, Dong G, Wang X, Jia Y, Tong Z. Receptor conversion impacts outcomes of different molecular subtypes of primary breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211012982. [PMID: 33995598 PMCID: PMC8111518 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211012982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although the conversion of clinically used breast cancer biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) between primary tumors and metastatic lesions is well recognized, data on whether receptor conversion has an effect on therapy management and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer is limited. This study aimed to investigate the clinical implications of receptor conversion throughout tumor progression. Methods In total, 2450 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were analyzed and 426 female patients with available biopsy results from both primary and metastatic sites were included in this study. We investigated the alteration of ER, PR and HER2 during breast cancer progression and evaluated the therapy management and prognostic value of receptor conversion. Results The conversion rates of ER, PR, and HER2 between primary tumors and metastasis were 21.1% (McNemar's test p < 0.001), 33.2% (p < 0.001), and 11.6% (p = 0.868), respectively. Evaluation of ER, PR, and HER2 status in multiple consecutive metastases revealed a change in 19.1% (p > 0.05), 23.5% (p = 0.021), and 9.8% (p > 0.05) of patients, respectively. Adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy/endocrine therapy) was related to hormone receptor conversion (p < 0.05). A statistically significant differential survival associated with hormone receptor (ER/PR) conversion (log-rank p < 0.05) was observed. In the multivariate analysis, ER conversion was an independent influence factor of survival (p < 0.05). Molecular typing conversion in primary and metastatic lesions also had a significant effect on survival (p < 0.05). We found that changing treatment based on the receptor conversion could affect clinical outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusions Our findings indicated that receptor conversion during breast tumor progression had a significant effect on survival. Most importantly, our findings proved that patients with receptor conversion benefited from a change in therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weipeng Zhao
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Linlin Sun
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Guolei Dong
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaorui Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Jia
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhongsheng Tong
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, West Huan-Hu Road, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yi ZB, Yu P, Zhang S, Wang WN, Han YQ, Ouyang QC, Yan M, Wang XJ, Hu XC, Jiang ZF, Huang T, Tong ZS, Wang SS, Yin YM, Li H, Yang RX, Yang HW, Teng YE, Sun T, Cai L, Li HY, Chen X, He JJ, Liu XL, Yang SE, Wang JY, Fan JH, Qiao YL, Xu BH. Profile and outcome of receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases: a nation-wide multicenter epidemiological study. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:692-701. [PMID: 32700765 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Although receptor status including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) of the primary breast tumors was related to the prognosis of breast cancer patients, little information is yet available on whether patient management and survival are impacted by receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases. Using data from the nation-wide multicenter clinical epidemiology study of advanced breast cancer in China (NCT03047889), we report the situation of retesting ER, PR and HER2 status for breast cancer metastases and evaluate the patient management and prognostic value of receptor conversion. In total, 3295 patients were analyzed and 1583 (48.0%) patients retesting receptor status for metastasis. Discordance in one or more receptors between the primary and the metastatic biopsy was found in 37.7% of women. Patients who remained hormone receptor (HR) positive in their metastases had similar progression-free survival of first-line and second-line treatment compared to patients with HR conversion (P > .05). In multivariate analysis, patients who showed ER conversion from negative to positive had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than patients who remained negative in their metastases (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.90; P < .001). Patients with PR remained positive and had longer DFS than patients with PR conversion from negative to positive (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; P = .004). Patients with PR conversion have shorter overall survival than patients with PR remained positive or negative (P = .016 and P = .041, respectively). Our findings showed that the receptors' conversions were common in metastatic breast cancer, and the conversion impacted the survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zong-Bi Yi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pei Yu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Su Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Na Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yi-Qun Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qu-Chang Ouyang
- Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Jia Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xi-Chun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ze-Fei Jiang
- Department of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhong-Sheng Tong
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shu-Sen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Mei Yin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Province Tumor Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Run-Xiang Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Hua-Wei Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Yue-E Teng
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Liaoning Breast Cancer Research, Shenyang, China
| | - Li Cai
- The 4th Department of Internal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Hong-Yuan Li
- Department of the Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Medicine Oncology, 900 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Jun He
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xin-Lan Liu
- Department of Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Shun-E Yang
- Department of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jia-Yu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Hu Fan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bing-He Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stefanovic S, Wirtz R, Deutsch TM, Hartkopf A, Sinn P, Varga Z, Sobottka B, Sotiris L, Taran FA, Domschke C, Hennigs A, Brucker SY, Sohn C, Schuetz F, Schneeweiss A, Wallwiener M. Tumor biomarker conversion between primary and metastatic breast cancer: mRNA assessment and its concordance with immunohistochemistry. Oncotarget 2017; 8:51416-51428. [PMID: 28881657 PMCID: PMC5584258 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Biomarker changes between primary (PT) and metastatic tumor (MT) site may be significant in individualizing treatment strategies and can result from actual clonal evolution, biomarker conversion, or technical limitations of diagnostic tests. This study explored biomarker conversion during breast cancer (BC) progression in 67 patients with different tumor subtypes and metastatic sites via mRNA quantification and subsequently analyzed the concordance between real-time qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Immunostaining for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki-67 was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded PT and MT tissue sections. RT-qPCR was performed using a multiplex RT-qPCR kit for ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKI67 and the reference genes B2M and CALM2. Subsequent measurement of tumor biomarker mRNA expression to detect conversion revealed significant decreases in ESR1 and PGR mRNA and MKI67 upregulation (all p < 0.001) in MT compared to PT of all tumor subtypes and ERBB2 upregulation in MT from triple-negative PT patients (p = 0.023). Furthermore, ERBB2 mRNA was upregulated in MT brain biopsies, particularly those from triple-negative PTs (p = 0.023). High concordance between RT-qPCR and IHC was observed for ER/ESR1 (81%(κ 0.51) in PT and 84%(κ 0.34) in MT, PR/PGR (70%(κ 0.10) in PT and 78% (κ -0.32) in MT), and for HER2/ERBB2 (100% in PT and 89% in MT). Discordance between mRNA biomarker assessments of PT and MT resulting from receptor conversion calls for dynamic monitoring of BC tumor biomarkers. Overall, RT-qPCR assessment of BC target genes and their mRNA expression is highly concordant with IHC protein analysis in both primary and metastatic tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Stefanovic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ralph Wirtz
- Stratifyer Molecular Pathology GmbH, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas M. Deutsch
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Zurich University Hospital, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bettina Sobottka
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Zurich University Hospital, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lakis Sotiris
- Stratifyer Molecular Pathology GmbH, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Domschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andre Hennigs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Research Institute for Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schuetz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schrijver WAME, Schuurman K, van Rossum A, Peeters T, Ter Hoeve N, Zwart W, van Diest PJ, Moelans CB. Loss of steroid hormone receptors is common in malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions of breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy. Oncotarget 2017; 8:55550-55561. [PMID: 28903441 PMCID: PMC5589680 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Discordance in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between primary breast cancers and solid distant metastases (“conversion”) has been reported previously. Even though metastatic spread to the peritoneal and pleural cavities occurs frequently and is associated with high mortality, the rate of receptor conversion and the prognostic implications thereof remain elusive. We therefore determined receptor conversion in 91 effusion metastases (78 pleural, 13 peritoneal effusions) of 69 patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization. Data were coupled to clinical variables and treatment history. ERα, PR and AR receptor status converted from positive in the primary tumor to negative in the effusion metastases or vice versa in 25-30%, 30-35% and 46-51% of cases for the 1% and 10% thresholds for positivity, respectively. 19-25% of patients converted clinically relevant from “ERα+ or PR+” to ERα-/PR- and 3-4% from ERα-/PR- to “ERα+ or PR+”. For HER2, conversion was observed in 6% of cases. Importantly, receptor conversion for ERα (p = 0.058) and AR (p < 0.001) was more often seen in patients adjuvantly treated with endocrine therapy. Analogous to this observation, HER2-loss was more frequent in patients adjuvantly treated with trastuzumab (p < 0.001). Alike solid distant metastases, receptor conversion for ERα, PR, AR and HER2 is a frequent phenomenon in peritoneal and pleural effusion metastases. Adjuvant endocrine and trastuzumab therapy imposes an evolutionary selection pressure on the tumor, leading to receptor loss in effusion metastases. Determination of receptor status in malignant effusion specimens will facilitate endocrine treatment decision-making at this lethal state of the disease, and is hence recommended whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karianne Schuurman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Annelot van Rossum
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ton Peeters
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Natalie Ter Hoeve
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy B Moelans
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jin X, Jiang YZ, Chen S, Yu KD, Shao ZM, Di GH. Prognostic value of receptor conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study. Oncotarget 2015; 6:9600-11. [PMID: 25826079 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The hormone receptor (HR) status and human epidermal growth hormone receptor 2 (HER2) status of patients with breast cancer may change following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of receptor conversion in breast cancer patients treated with NCT.Of the 423 consecutive patients who had residual disease in the breast after NCT, 55 (13.0%) changed from HR (+) to HR (-), 23 (5.4%) changed from HR (-) to HR (+), 27 (6.4%) changed from HER2 (+) to HER2 (-), and 13 (3.1%) changed from HER2 (-) to HER2 (+). A total of 54 (12.8%) changed to the triple-negative (TN) tumor phenotype. The loss of HR positivity was an independent prognostic factor for worse disease-free survival (DFS) and worse overall survival (OS) in multivariate survival analysis. Furthermore, the switch to the TN phenotype after NCT was another independent prognostic factor for worse survival for both DFS and OS. In conclusion, patients with breast cancer may experience changes in HR status, HER2 status and tumor phenotype after NCT. The loss of HR positivity and the switch to the TN phenotype after NCT were associated with a worse patient outcome.
Collapse
|