Hindbrain ghrelin and liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide 2, ligands for growth hormone secretagogue receptor, bidirectionally control food intake

Hindbrain growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) agonism increases food intake, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. The functional effects of hindbrain GHSR antagonism by its endogenous antagonist liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 (LEAP2) are also yet unexplored. To test the hypothesis that hindbrain GHSR agonism attenuates the food intake inhibitory effect of gastrointestinal (GI) satiation signals, ghrelin (at a feeding subthreshold dose) was administered to the fourth ventricle (4V) or directly to the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) before systemic delivery of the GI satiation signal cholecystokinin (CCK). Also examined, was whether hindbrain GHSR agonism attenuated CCK-induced NTS neural activation (c-Fos immunofluorescence). To investigate an alternate hypothesis that hindbrain GHSR agonism enhances feeding motivation and food seeking, intake stimulatory ghrelin doses were administered to the 4V and fixed ratio 5 (FR-5), progressive ratio (PR), and operant reinstatement paradigms for palatable food responding were evaluated. Also assessed were 4V LEAP2 delivery on food intake and body weight (BW) and on ghrelin-stimulated feeding. Both 4V and NTS ghrelin blocked the intake inhibitory effect of CCK and 4V ghrelin blocked CCK-induced NTS neural activation. Although 4V ghrelin increased low-demand FR-5 responding, it did not increase high-demand PR or reinstatement of operant responding. Fourth ventricle LEAP2 reduced chow intake and BW and blocked hindbrain ghrelin-stimulated feeding. Data support a role for hindbrain GHSR in bidirectional control of food intake through mechanisms that include interacting with the NTS neural processing of GI satiation signals but not food motivation and food seeking.

A Role for GLP-1 in Treating Hyperphagia and Obesity

Obesity is a chronic recurring disease whose prevalence has almost tripled over the past 40 years. In individuals with obesity, there is significant increased risk of morbidity and mortality, along with decreased quality of life. Increased obesity prevalence results, at least partly, from the increased global food supply that provides ubiquitous access to tasty, energy-dense foods. These hedonic foods and the nonfood cues that through association become reward predictive cues activate brain appetitive control circuits that drive hyperphagia and weight gain by enhancing food-seeking, motivation, and reward. Behavioral therapy (diet and lifestyle modifications) is the recommended initial treatment for obesity, yet it often fails to achieve meaningful weight loss. Furthermore, those who lose weight regain it over time through biological regulation. The need to effectively treat the pathophysiology of obesity thus centers on biologically based approaches such as bariatric surgery and more recently developed drug therapies. This review highlights neurobiological aspects relevant to obesity causation and treatment by emphasizing the common aspects of the feeding-inhibitory effects of multiple signals. We focus on glucagon like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) signaling as a promising obesity treatment target by discussing the activation of intestinal- and brain-derived GLP-1 and GLP-1R expressing central nervous system circuits resulting from normal eating, bariatric surgery, and GLP-1R agonist drug therapy. Given the increased availability of energy-dense foods and frequent encounters with cues that drive hyperphagia, this review also describes how bariatric surgery and GLP-1R agonist therapies influence food reward and the motivational drive to overeat.

Protein-enriched fiber vegan meal promote satiety and suppress food intake in rats

Dietary preferences were closely associated with the pathogenesis of numbers of metabolic disorders, in particularly, obesity. Dietary fiber was shown to be capable of preventing weight gain and excessive food intake mainly through stimulating chewing and saliva secretion, and promote satiety signals. In this study, we characterized the "Vitamin World® Vegan Meal" Formula of Feihe, a novel protein-enriched fiber dietary supplement contained potato protease inhibitor II (PI2) that developed. And we demonstrated that this particular fiber formula was effective in preventing weight gain, increasing satiety signals, and reducing food intake in rats in a dosage-dependent manner. Our study provides lines of evidence and would further bolster the use of this nutritious vegan meal in regulating satiety and food intake in clinics.

Nutritive, Post-ingestive Signals Are the Primary Regulators of AgRP Neuron Activity

The brain regulates food intake by processing sensory cues and peripheral physiological signals, but the neural basis of this integration remains unclear. Hypothalamic, agouti-related protein (AgRP)-expressing neurons are critical regulators of food intake. AgRP neuron activity is high during hunger and is rapidly reduced by the sight and smell of food. Here, we reveal two distinct components of AgRP neuron activity regulation: a rapid but transient sensory-driven signal and a slower, sustained calorie-dependent signal. We discovered that nutrients are necessary and sufficient for sustained reductions in AgRP neuron activity and that activity reductions are proportional to the calories obtained. This change in activity is recapitulated by exogenous administration of gut-derived satiation signals. Furthermore, we showed that the nutritive value of food trains sensory systems-in a single trial-to drive rapid, anticipatory AgRP neuron activity inhibition. Together, these data demonstrate that nutrients are the primary regulators of AgRP neuron activity.

Intragastric nutrient infusion reduces motivation for food in male and female rats

The idea that gut-derived satiation signals influence food reward has recently gained traction, but this hypothesis is largely based on studies focused on neural circuitry, not the peripherally released signals. Here, we directly tested the hypothesis that intragastric (IG) nutrient infusion can suppress motivation for food. In a series of experiments, IG sucrose infusion (15 kcal) significantly and reliably reduced operant responding for a sucrose reward on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule. Moreover, food deprivation for 24 h before the test session did not prevent the suppressive effect of nutrients. The suppressive effect of IG sucrose on fixed ratio 5 (FR5) operant responding was also assessed as a comparison. The effect of IG nutrients to reduce motivation was not limited to sucrose; IG Ensure infusion (9.3 kcal) also significantly reduced PR operant responding for sucrose pellets. To verify that these effects were not secondary to the osmotic challenge of concentrated nutrients, we tested IG infusion of noncaloric saline solutions equiosmolar to 40% sucrose or Ensure and found no effect. Finally, we focused on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and cholecystokinin (CCK) as candidate mediators for the effect of IG nutrients. Pretreatment with exendin-9, a GLP-1 receptor antagonist, delivered intraperitoneally, significantly attenuated the ability of IG nutrients to suppress PR responding and breakpoint in males, but not in females, whereas pretreatment with devazepide, a CCK_A receptor antagonist, failed to do so in both sexes. Together, these data support the idea that nutrient-induced satiation signals influence food reward and may implicate GLP-1 in this process.