1
|
Lu S, Jiang D, Liu S, Liang H, Lu J, Xu H, Li J, Xiao J, Zhang J, Fei Q. Effect of different structures fabricated by additive manufacturing on bone ingrowth. J Biomater Appl 2022; 36:1863-1872. [PMID: 35227103 DOI: 10.1177/08853282211064398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effects of different structures (solid/hollow) and pore diameters (300/600 μm) on bone ingrowth. METHODS Porous titanium alloy scaffolds (3.2 * 10.5 mm) were printed using electron beam melting. The implants were divided into either Hollow or Solid Group. The upper half of each implant was printed with a pore diameter of 600 μm while the bottom half was printed with a pore diameter of 300 μm. Visualization of the structural morphology was done using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Cell proliferation was evaluated with the cell counting kit-8 assay and live/dead staining assay. The different lateral femoral condyles of 15 New Zealand rabbits were implanted with different groups of scaffolds. The rabbits were randomly sacrificed at the 4th, 8th, and 12th week postoperatively. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) evaluation was completed by quantitative Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT). Tissue histology were stained with toluidine blue to observe bone ingrowth under an optical microscope, and the percentage of new bone area were calculated using Image Pro-Plus 6.0. RESULTS SEM images showed a significant decrease in residual powder in the hollow implant and cell studies showed no obvious cytotoxicity for the Ti6Al4V scaffolds. Micro-CT reconstruction revealed high levels of new bone formation around the scaffolds. The trabeculae around the implants showed a gradual increase with each week, and new bone filled the scaffold pores gradually. BMD, BV/TV, and tissue histology revealed the 300 μm pore diameter is more conducive to bone ingrowth than the 600 μm (p < .05). CONCLUSION Our study revealed that Ti6Al4V implants with hollow structure could reduce the residual metal powder and implants with 300 μm pore diameter were more effective on bone formation than a 600 μm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunyi Lu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Dongjie Jiang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Shuhao Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Haifeng Liang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Junren Lu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jian Xiao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qinming Fei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Wusong Branch, Fudan University, Shanghai 200940, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanczar M, Moazen M, Day R. The Significance of Biomechanics and Scaffold Structure for Bladder Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222312657. [PMID: 34884464 PMCID: PMC8657955 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Current approaches for bladder reconstruction surgery are associated with many morbidities. Tissue engineering is considered an ideal approach to create constructs capable of restoring the function of the bladder wall. However, many constructs to date have failed to create a sufficient improvement in bladder capacity due to insufficient neobladder compliance. This review evaluates the biomechanical properties of the bladder wall and how the current reconstructive materials aim to meet this need. To date, limited data from mechanical testing and tissue anisotropy make it challenging to reach a consensus on the native properties of the bladder wall. Many of the materials whose mechanical properties have been quantified do not fall within the range of mechanical properties measured for native bladder wall tissue. Many promising new materials have yet to be mechanically quantified, which makes it difficult to ascertain their likely effectiveness. The impact of scaffold structures and the long-term effect of implanting these materials on their inherent mechanical properties are areas yet to be widely investigated that could provide important insight into the likely longevity of the neobladder construct. In conclusion, there are many opportunities for further investigation into novel materials for bladder reconstruction. Currently, the field would benefit from a consensus on the target values of key mechanical parameters for bladder wall scaffolds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Hanczar
- Applied Biomedical Engineering Group, Centre for Precision Healthcare, UCL Division of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6JF, UK;
| | - Mehran Moazen
- UCL Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK;
| | - Richard Day
- Applied Biomedical Engineering Group, Centre for Precision Healthcare, UCL Division of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6JF, UK;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-203-108-2183
| |
Collapse
|