Current airway management practices after a failed intubation attempt in Australian and New Zealand emergency departments

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study were to describe current airway management practices after a failed intubation attempt in Australian and New Zealand EDs and to explore factors associated with second attempt success.

METHODS

Data were collected from a multicentre airway registry (The Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry). All intubation episodes that required a second attempt between March 2010 and November 2015 were analysed. Analysis for association with success at the second attempt was undertaken for patient factors including predicted difficulty of laryngoscopy, as well as for changes in laryngoscope type, adjunct devices, intubator and intubating manoeuvres.

RESULTS

Of the 762 patients with a failed first intubation attempt, 603 (79.1%) were intubated successfully at the second attempt. The majority of second attempts were undertaken by emergency consultants (36.8%) and emergency registrars (34.2%). A change in intubator occurred in 56.5% of intubation episodes and was associated with higher second attempt success (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.65). In 69.7% of second attempts at intubation, there was no change in laryngoscope type. Changes in laryngoscope type, adjunct devices and intubation manoeuvres were not significantly associated with success at the second attempt. In adjusted analyses, second attempt success was higher for a change from a non-consultant intubator to a consultant intubator from any specialty (adjusted OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.35-3.95) and where laryngoscopy was not predicted to be difficult (adjusted OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.58-4.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of second intubation attempts were undertaken by emergency consultants and registrars. A change from a non-consultant intubator to a consultant intubator of any specialty for the second attempt and intubation episodes where laryngoscopy was predicted to be non-difficult were associated with a higher success rate at intubation. Participation in routine collection and monitoring of airway management practices via a Registry may enable the introduction of appropriate improvements in airway procedures and reduce complication rates.

Factors associated with successful rescue intubation attempts in the emergency department: an analysis of multicenter prospective observational study in Japan

Aim

It remains unclear whether physicians should change intubation approaches after the failed first attempt. We aimed to determine the rescue intervention approaches associated with a higher success rate at the second attempt in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

We analyzed the data from a prospective, multicenter, observational study – the second Japanese Emergency Airway Network Study. The current analysis included all patients who underwent emergency intubation from February 2012 through November 2017. We defined a rescue intubation attempt as a second intubation attempt with any change in intubation approaches (i.e., change in methods, devices, or intubators) from the failed first attempt. The outcome measure was second‐attempt success.

Results

Of 2,710 patients with a failed first attempt, 43% underwent a second intubation attempt with changes in intubation approach (i.e., rescue intubation). Rescue intubation attempts were associated with a higher second‐attempt success rate compared to non‐rescue intubation attempts (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50–2.12). The rescue intubation approaches associated with a higher second‐attempt success were changes from non‐rapid sequence intubation (RSI) to RSI (adjusted OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.12–3.75), from non‐emergency medicine (EM) residents to EM residents (adjusted OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.44–2.82), and from non‐EM attending physicians to EM attending physicians (adjusted OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.14–3.71).

Conclusions

In this large multicenter study, rescue interventions were associated with a higher second‐attempt success rate. The data also support the use of RSI and backup by EM residents or EM attending physicians to improve the airway management performance after a failed attempt in the ED.