Limited Link of Common Blood Parameters with Tinnitus

Background: Tinnitus severity is generally assessed by psychometric and audiological instruments. However, no objective measure exists to evaluate the subjective discomfort and suffering caused by this hearing phenomenon. The objective of this work was to determine the possible blood parameters for diagnostics and therapy. Methods: We measured tinnitus distress by using the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) and collected tinnitus-related audiological measures, namely the hearing threshold (HT), tinnitus loudness (TL), and sensation level (SL, i.e., the tinnitus loudness/hearing threshold at a tinnitus frequency). Blood samples were taken from 200 outpatients of the Tinnitus Centre of the Charité, and 46 routine blood count parameters were examined. The possible interactions were determined by (robust) linear models. Results: Tinnitus distress and audiological measurements were largely uncorrelated but could partly be predicted by selected blood parameters. First, the erythrocyte counts predicted tinnitus distress to a small extent. Second, the levels of vitamin D3 explained about 6% of tinnitus loudness and, age-dependently, the hearing threshold variability. Last, the levels of uric acid explained about 5% of the sensation level variability. Conclusions: Tinnitus is a multidimensional phenomenon. The marginal influences of blood markers suggest the possible roles of inflammation and oxidative stress produced by psychological or somatic burdens. Clinically, a vitamin D substitution (in older patients) might have a hearing-protective effect.

The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate sensation level (SL)-dependent characteristics of envelope following responses (EFRs) elicited by band-limited speech dominant in low, mid, and high frequencies.

DESIGN

In 21 young normal hearing adults, EFRs were elicited by 8 male-spoken speech stimuli-the first formant, and second and higher formants of /u/, /a/ and /i/, and modulated fricatives, /∫/ and /s/. Stimulus SL was computed from behaviorally measured thresholds.

RESULTS

At 30 dB SL, the amplitude and phase coherence of fricative-elicited EFRs were ~1.5 to 2 times higher than all vowel-elicited EFRs, whereas fewer and smaller differences were found among vowel-elicited EFRs. For all stimuli, EFR amplitude and phase coherence increased by roughly 50% for every 10 dB increase in SL between ~0 and 50 dB.

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulus and frequency dependency in EFRs exist despite accounting for differences in audibility of speech sounds. The growth rate of EFR characteristics with SL is independent of stimulus and its frequency.

Evaluation of prosodic and segmental change in speech-modulated bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields

Speech-modulated bone-conducted ultrasound (BCU) can transmit speech sounds for some profoundly deaf individuals. Hearing aids using BCU are considered to be a novel hearing system for such individuals. In our previous study, the speech discrimination for speech-modulated BCU was objectively confirmed using a magnetoencephalography. Moreover, in our previous behavioral study, prosodic information for speech-modulated BCU could also be discriminated in the normal hearing. However, the prosodic discrimination for speech-modulated BCU has not objectively been studied. In order to evaluate the prosodic discrimination for speech-modulated BCU, mismatch fields (MMFs) elicited by prosodic and segmental change were measured for speech-modulated BCU and air-conducted speech. Ten Japanese participants with normal hearing took part in this study. Stimuli re-synthesized from the speech of a native Japanese female adult were used. Standard stimulus was /itta/ with a flat pitch pattern, and two deviant stimuli were /itta?/ with a rising pitch pattern and /itte/ with a flat pitch pattern. All and nine participants elicited the prominent MMF elicited by the prosodic and segmental change for the speech-modulated BCU, respectively. The moment of MMF components for speech-modulated BCU was significantly smaller than those for air-conducted speech, while no difference in the MMF latency elicited by the prosodic and segmental change were observed between both stimulus conditions. Comparing the MMFs elicited by prosodic and segmental change, no significant differences were observed for both stimulus conditions. Thus, it is suggested that the prosodic change can be discriminate to the same degree as segmental change even for speech-modulated BCU. However, discrimination capability for speech-modulated BCU is slightly inferior to that for air-conducted speech.