Implications of Gender on the Outcome in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is uncommon and predominantly affects females. Data on AIH from India are scanty. We retrospectively analyzed the spectrum and outcome of adults with AIH and compared it between male and female patients.

METHODS

AIH was diagnosed using a simplified AIH score. For suspected seronegative AIH, the revised score was used. Standard therapies for AIH and portal hypertension were administered and response was assessed at six months. Relapse rates and five-year mortality were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 157 patients with AIH, 85 (male: female 25: 60) were included in the study. The median age at diagnosis was 46 (interquartile range (IQR) 32-55.5) years in males vs 45 (IQR 34.2-54) years in females (p=0.91). A similar proportion of male and female patients presented with cirrhosis, acute severe AIH, or AIH-related acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF); Extra-hepatic autoimmune diseases were less common in male patients (16% vs 35.5% p=0.02). Other laboratory and histological features were comparable in both groups. During the median follow-up period of 51 months (IQR 45-67 months). The biochemical and clinical response at six months were seen in 64% of male patients and 63.3% of female patients (p= 0.57). Of patients, 75% relapsed in the male AIH group (12 of 16 patients) after initial remission compared to 42% in the female group (p=0.02). Five-year mortality was 14.1%, and no patient developed hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Male and female patients with AIH have similar clinical, biochemical, and histological profiles. More male patients relapsed after an initial response to therapy.

Seronegative Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Rare Manifestation of COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus pandemic in 2019, commonly causes hepatic dysfunction. Liver injury ranges from mildly elevated liver enzymes to fulminant liver failure. Interestingly, there are cases that suggest a relationship between autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in patients who either contracted coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19) or were vaccinated against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We present a case of a 39-year-old female without a significant past medical history who presented with two weeks of jaundice, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea. She had significantly elevated liver enzymes and conjugated hyperbilirubinemia. She also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 but denied any respiratory symptoms; her vaccination status was up to date. She denied taking hepatotoxic agents, and the workup was negative for acute viral hepatitis. The F-actin antibody level was 22 units, but serum immunoglobulin (IgG), anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-smooth muscle, anti-mitochondrial, anti-liver/kidney microsomal-1, anti-soluble liver antigen, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies levels were not elevated. Computerized tomography of the abdomen and pelvis revealed hepatic hemangiomas. Eventually, a liver biopsy was performed, and histology showed active lymphoplasmacytic hepatitis with prominent regenerative changes and areas of confluent necrosis. The histologic findings, along with the patient's clinical course, were suggestive of autoimmune hepatitis. The patient was started on systemic steroids with an improvement of abdominal pain and jaundice, as well as an improvement of her liver chemical profile. She was discharged with plans for hepatology clinic follow-up. Here, we present a rare case of seronegative AIH in a patient with a recent COVID-19 infection and discuss the potential underlying mechanism. We call for further investigation into the relationship between autoimmune dysfunction and COVID-19, as well as the pathophysiology behind it. Analyzing how the virus causes autoimmune dysfunction may allow clinicians to more effectively treat patients suffering from sequelae of COVID-19 infection, and it is important not to exclude autoimmune hepatitis from the differential based on the initial autoimmune workup.

[Сlinical, immunological and morphological features in different types of autoimmune hepatitis]

Due to the absence of the pathognomonic diagnostic criteria and to the diversity of clinical, serological and morphological manifestations, the diagnostic of the autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) remains to be a difficult task, which might lead to the delay of the timely beginning of the immunosuppressive therapy (IST), which in turn affects the disease outcomes.

AIM

To studying the clinical, biochemical, immunological and morphological markers in patients with seronegative (SN) and seropositive (SP) AIH and the qualities of their response to the IST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 82 AIH patients over the course of the years 20142019. All patients were selected in accordance with the criteria of the simplified assessment system of the IAIHG. Clinical, laboratorial and morphological characteristics of the AIH were analyzed. Therapy response was evaluated by the level of the ALT and IgG in 612 months after the start of the IST. The study material underwent statistical analysis using methods of parametrical and nonparametrical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed in the Statistica 13.3 (developed by StatSoft Inc., USA).

RESULTS

67/82 (81.70%) of the patients studied were women, median age of 54 years old [38; 70]. Patients with the diagnosis of the possible AIH according to the IAIHG made 85.4% (70 people). Almost everyone 96% (79/82) had morphological features of the interface-hepatitis with the lymphocytic/plasmocytic infiltration; emperipolesis was discovered in 63% of patients (49/82), hepatocellular rosette in 23% (19/82). Patients with SN AIH comprised 36.5% (30/82), with SP 63.4% (52/82). Comparative analysis demonstrated that the clinical profile in patients with SN and SP AIH is the same, while the incidence of immuno-associated diseases is significantly higher in the group of seronegative AIH. The morphological profile in the two AIH groups is identical in both typical and atypical manifestations. The number of responders to IST was 63% (19/30) SN AIH vs 67% SP AIH (35/52), did not differ significantly (p=0.529).However, that the number of patients with liver cirrhosis in the SN AIH group was twice as big as the ones with SP: 37% vs 17% (p=0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

A comparative analysis of clinical, laboratory, morphological and clinical manifestations in the SN and SP AIH groups did not detected statistically significant significant differences, which may indicate that SN and SP AIH are the faces of one disease. It is possible that AB cannot be identified within the known spectrum of antibodies, or antibodies have slow expression, or are suppressed by the immune system. In any case, suspicions of AIH, in the absence of antibodies, it is recommended that liver biopsy be performed for the timely diagnosis of AIH and IST. Сirrhosis was more often diagnosed in the group SN AIH, which may be due to a later diagnosis, and therefore to untimely IST. The found frequent association of SN AIH with other immune-associated diseases requires a carefully study of this problem. The variety of clinical manifestations of AIH requires further study, the identification of clinical phenotypes with certain feature. This can help in the future to timely identify potentially problematic patients and predict a response to IST.